50 likes | 195 Views
draft-ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw. Shepherd report. Why an “external” shepherd?. Most of the people that normally would have shepherded are co-authors. Shepherd review. Lots of details and nits Nothing serious Current version -17 (sic!) is updated after the shepherd review. IPR Poll.
E N D
draft-ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw Shepherd report
Why an “external” shepherd? • Most of the people that normally would have shepherded are co-authors.
Shepherd review • Lots of details and nits • Nothing serious • Current version -17 (sic!) is updated after the shepherd review
IPR Poll • 20 co-authors • At least 4 of them have new and “unknown” mail-addresses. • Still waiting for 4 responses • Two has responded off-list • I’ve judge this to be OK, but will be detailed in the shepherd write-up • What happens if we don’t get the responses • We will ask the wg if it is prepared to go ahead anyway • Fairly complicate shepherd write-up
Shepherd write-up • Docuement that is sent to the IESG with the request for publication • Include information on (among other things) • Details on how the shepherd and the wg have reviewed the draft • The IPR sitution • Know or inteneded implemenations • How solid the support for the document is within the eg