730 likes | 1.12k Views
2. Guyana ADR Conference . 5- 6 November 2007. 3. Welcome. Danny McFadden
E N D
2. 2 Guyana ADR Conference
3. 3 Start 9.00 -10mins
Graham to Open and Introduce himself and allow James to Introduce himself
Go around the room and get participants to introduce themselves
House keeping issues (toilets, fire alarm, coffee etc)
Start 9.00 -10mins
Graham to Open and Introduce himself and allow James to Introduce himself
Go around the room and get participants to introduce themselves
House keeping issues (toilets, fire alarm, coffee etc)
4. 4
5. 5 The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) 9.10-9.25: What is CEDR- 15 mins
Slides 4 to 11
After slides show them around the office
9.10-9.25: What is CEDR- 15 mins
Slides 4 to 11
After slides show them around the office
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
10. 10
11. 11
12. 12
13. 13
14. 14
15. 15 Agenda 9.20-9.30 Introduction to the Programme: James 10mins
Slides 12-15
Give over view of the next three days
9.20-9.30 Introduction to the Programme: James 10mins
Slides 12-15
Give over view of the next three days
16. 16
17. 17
18. 18 Overview Day One:
Mediation
Core principles
Confidentiality
Without prejudice
Voluntary
Stages of mediation
Preparation
Setting up
Exploration
Negotiation
Conclusion
19. 19
20. 20 9.30- 9.45: Issues board Exercise
Explain Purpose: To make sure cover areas they want etc
In groups of 2 take 5 mins to talk about at least one question you would like answered or one piece of information about ADR
Come back to group and put them up on tandem Issues Board ( one in englidh and one in Arabic (one translator to write up)
9.30- 9.45: Issues board Exercise
Explain Purpose: To make sure cover areas they want etc
In groups of 2 take 5 mins to talk about at least one question you would like answered or one piece of information about ADR
Come back to group and put them up on tandem Issues Board ( one in englidh and one in Arabic (one translator to write up)
21. 21 9.30- 9.45: Issues board Exercise
Explain Purpose: To make sure cover areas they want etc
In groups of 2 take 5 mins to talk about at least one question you would like answered or one piece of information about ADR
Come back to group and put them up on tandem Issues Board ( one in englidh and one in Arabic (one translator to write up)
9.30- 9.45: Issues board Exercise
Explain Purpose: To make sure cover areas they want etc
In groups of 2 take 5 mins to talk about at least one question you would like answered or one piece of information about ADR
Come back to group and put them up on tandem Issues Board ( one in englidh and one in Arabic (one translator to write up)
22. 22 Consumer Protection – types of assistance required when dealing with utilities Customer Service
Billing/charging
Equipment faults
Mis-selling/misinformation
Loss of service
Delay in providing services
Disconnection/reconnection
Privacy
Something else
23. 23 Characteristics of an Effective Consumer Dispute Resolution System Consumer focused
Accessible
Transparent and accountable
Independent
Fair
Speedy
Low cost
Informal
Inquisitorial
Interative
24. 24 The importance of an effective dispute resolution system “It was to me never reason for irritation but rather a source of comfort when these bodies were asked to adjudicate on actions of my government and the Office and judged against it. One of the first judgements of our Constitutional Court, for example, found that I, as President, administratively acted in a manner they would not condone. From that judgement my government and I drew reassurance that the ordinary citizens of our country would be protected against abuse, no matter from which quarters it would emanate. Similarly, the Public Protector [Ombudsman] had on more than one occasion been required to adjudicate in such matters.”
Nelson Mandela, 2000
25. 25 The importance of dispute resolution as part of an effective dispute resolution system for consumers and governments Quick
Cost effective
Informal and Flexible
Wide range of settlement possibilities
Helps maintain relationships
Successful
26. 26 Dispute Resolution Systems Arbitration
Mediation
Ombudsman Schemes
27. 27 Negotiation Mediation Arbitration Ombudsman Participation of Parties
Decision Maker
Outcome
Private/Public
Voluntary/Non-voluntary
Formality
Procedure
Enforceability
28. 28 Best Practice in the UK and USA UK
Nominet (free mediation -> adjudication at a fee - > appeal at high fee)
Office of Telecommunication Ombudsmen – Otelo (sorting it out informally -> formal decision)
CISAS (Communications & Internet Services Adjudication Scheme), Energywatch
National Mediation Helpline (Ministry of Justice initiative, low cost mediation, <50K)
USA
Public Utilities Commission in all states (PUCs) (regulates rates & services -> complaints)
29. 29
Relevance of ADR in liberalizing markets
Case study dispute resolution programme for consumers in Kazakhstan
30. 30 Mediation
31. 31 Mediation definition (CEDR) "Mediation is a flexible process conducted confidentially in which a neutral person actively assists parties in working towards a negotiated agreement of a dispute or difference, with the parties in ultimate control of the decision to settle and the terms of resolution."
32. 32 The principles Flexible
Impartial
Neutrality
Voluntary
Parties in control of decision making
Confidentiality
33. 33 Mediator’s role Provides structure and process
Provides help with communication
Clarifies misunderstandings and misconceptions
Builds trust in the process
34. 34 Introduction to ADR 9.50 Purpose of this section (5mins)
to give an overview of what ADR is
Provide a definition of ADR
Look at the processes in detail and look at types of cases that are suitable for the different types of processes9.50 Purpose of this section (5mins)
to give an overview of what ADR is
Provide a definition of ADR
Look at the processes in detail and look at types of cases that are suitable for the different types of processes
35. 35 9.55 What is ADR ( 10 mins)
1.
At its widest ADR is defined as any process involving use of third party neutral as alternative to litigation
This would include formal arbitration but exclude negotiation as a DR process
Should bear in mind that 90% disputes in society are resolved by negotiation without resorting to the courts. Of the 10 % of those where court proceeding are started only 10% of them actually end up in trial.
2
Important to emphasize these processes are nothing new- most cultures have had informal ADR processes as part of their culture. As Civil Justice systems have got more complicated merely looking to formalise the us erof these processes within modern day legal system
3.
Can be used alongside existing processes- led to different terminology
Appropriate Dispute Resolution
Primary Dispute Resolution ( Australia)
Effective DR (CEDR) – the right process for the dispute
9.55 What is ADR ( 10 mins)
1.
At its widest ADR is defined as any process involving use of third party neutral as alternative to litigation
This would include formal arbitration but exclude negotiation as a DR process
Should bear in mind that 90% disputes in society are resolved by negotiation without resorting to the courts. Of the 10 % of those where court proceeding are started only 10% of them actually end up in trial.
2
Important to emphasize these processes are nothing new- most cultures have had informal ADR processes as part of their culture. As Civil Justice systems have got more complicated merely looking to formalise the us erof these processes within modern day legal system
3.
Can be used alongside existing processes- led to different terminology
Appropriate Dispute Resolution
Primary Dispute Resolution ( Australia)
Effective DR (CEDR) – the right process for the dispute
36. 36 10.05 A graphical representation of the dispute resolution spectrum. (10mins)
Slides 18 and 19
Negotiation on the left is entirely voluntary and informal, with no third party involvement.
Moving across to the right the process become
less voluntary,
more formal
have increasing third-party involvement.10.05 A graphical representation of the dispute resolution spectrum. (10mins)
Slides 18 and 19
Negotiation on the left is entirely voluntary and informal, with no third party involvement.
Moving across to the right the process become
less voluntary,
more formal
have increasing third-party involvement.
37. 37 Reasons for encouraging mediation
38. 38
39. 39
40. 40
41. 41
42. 42
43. 43 Stages of mediation
44. 44
45. 45
46. 46 Negotiation
47. 47 Negotiation styles Avoiding
Accommodating
Competing
Co-operative/compromising
Collaborative/principled/problem solving
48. 48 Approaches to ‘winning’
49. 49 Self interest and five negotiation styles
50. 50
51. 51
52. 52
53. 53
54. 54
55. 55
56. 56
57. 57
58. 58 Elements of negotiation Types of negotiation styles:
Competitive or hard-bargaining style
Co-operative or soft bargaining style
Principled negotiation
59. 59 Co-operative vs competitive Hard vs soft negotiation
Principled negotiation
The underlying assumptions
60. 60 What if other party does not adopt a principled strategy? Comparison of principled negotiation with hard and soft negotiation styles
Negotiating tactics and strategies
Claiming value
Creating value
61. 61
62. 62
63. 63
64. 64
65. 65
66. 66
67. 67
68. 68 Cross-cultural communication (1) Culture
Communication
Low context
Individualistic
High context
69. 69 Cross-cultural communication (2) Collective
Body language
Listening
Talking
Decision-making
70. 70 Organising a mediation
71. 71
72. 72
73. 73