1 / 19

World Bank EU-8 Quarterly Economic Report

World Bank EU-8 Quarterly Economic Report. April 2005 World bank Vilnius office Jekaterina Rojaka. Lithuania will remain among the leaders by growth in 2005. Consumption and investment remain strong drivers. CPI starts to be a key constraint. Brent Crude Oil, US/BBL.

nyoko
Download Presentation

World Bank EU-8 Quarterly Economic Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. World Bank EU-8 Quarterly Economic Report April 2005 World bank Vilnius office Jekaterina Rojaka

  2. Lithuania will remain among the leaders by growth in 2005

  3. Consumption and investment remain strong drivers

  4. CPI starts to be a key constraint Brent Crude Oil, US/BBL

  5. While significantly dropped, structural unemployment remains high

  6. Do the Baltics run pro‑ cyclical expansionary policies? Electoral budget cycles in the Baltic countries Source: AMECO

  7. Special Topic Labor taxes and employmentin the EU-8

  8. Labor taxes and employmentin the EU-8 - contents • current statutory and effective tax rates • theoretical foundations of the tax wedge-employment • findings from empirical studies • situation in the EU: determinants • panel regression analysis • conclusions: there exists a strongly negative relationship between employment growth and the size of the tax wedge in EU8

  9. Current tax rates in EU8

  10. Effective and statutory tax rates

  11. The relative tax burden for low wage earners is much higher in EU8 than in EU15 • The average tax wedge for a 50% APW earner in EU8 countries is 38.6%, whereas in EU15 it is on average 4.7 percentage points lower • WHY? Because of the flat or regressive character of social security contributions.

  12. The more elastic is the L supply curve, the more harmful is the tax wedge for employment Important factors: • skills • minimum wage • non-employment benefits • other taxes • taxed party

  13. Empirical results • Problem 1: Lagging • Problem 2: Measurement issues • which taxes to include: payroll vs income taxes • average or marginal tax rates: participation vs working hours • representative worker or a macroeconomic ratio • no clear guidelines, but: measures are correlated • Results: there is a negative relationship, however magnitude fluctuates, because of different elasticities (from -0.11 to -0.55)

  14. Determinants of the tax wedge-employment relationship in EU8 • structure of the labor force • skilled versus unskilled labor • national minimum wage • non-employment income • unemployment and other social benefits • wage bargaining structure • This relationship could be stronger in the EU8

  15. Lithuania is highly abundant inlow-skill working force • Thus the negative effect is STRONGER compared to the rest of EU

  16. Estimation EMPGj,t = 0 + 1WEDGE j,t+ 2GDPG j,t+e j,t where: EMPG – employment growth, WEDGE – tax wedge for low wage (50% and 67% of APW) earners, GDPG – real GDP growth, j – country, t – year, e – error term.

  17. Strongly negative relationship between employment and the tax wedge in EU8 • Increase in tax wedge by 1 p.p. is associated with a decrease in employment growth by 0.5 - 0.8 p.p.

  18. Key conclusions and policy implications • Significant and negative relationship between the size of the tax wedge and employment exists • it is stronger that in EU15 • Lowering labor taxes (particularly payroll taxes) mayraise employment and output in the EU8 • Gap financing: • Self- financing; • Shift to general taxation • Broadening the tax base or raising consumption and/or wealth taxes • Better targeting of social transfers and reduction in subsidies

  19. Thank You

More Related