1 / 26

Yeshiva University (YU)

Procurement Transformation Maximizing the Potential of Procure-to-Pay Technology Jack D. Zencheck, Chief Procurement Officer, Yeshiva University. Yeshiva University (YU). Celebrating its 125th year.

nyssa-garrison
Download Presentation

Yeshiva University (YU)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Procurement TransformationMaximizing the Potential of Procure-to-Pay TechnologyJack D. Zencheck, Chief Procurement Officer, Yeshiva University

  2. Yeshiva University (YU) • Celebrating its 125th year. • YU is the country’s oldest and most comprehensive institution combining Jewish scholarship with academic excellence and achievement in the liberal arts and sciences, medicine, law, business, social work, psychology, Jewish studies, and education. • Students: 7,232 • Annual sponsored research: $225 million • Operating Budget: ~$648 million • Campuses: Locations throughout New York City and Israel

  3. What is Procure-to-Pay? • Strategic rather than tactical • Acquiring best contract pricing and termsvs. just buying (Procure) • Cost-effectivemethods of processing payments through technology. (Pay)

  4. Why Procure-to-Pay? • Executive Level Support • Strategy • Cost Benefit • Risks • Separation of Duties • Controls • Manual vs Systematic • Governance

  5. YU Procurement Services at a Glance • Purchasing • 90,000purchase orders processed • 80% ≤ $2,000 • 67,000 purchase orders processed electronically • $300,000,000 in spend • Accounts Payable • 179,623total invoices processed • 116,182 on Purchase Orders • 27,364 not on Purchase Orders • 36,077 processed thru EDI

  6. Procure-to-Pay - Table of Organization A. Basilone Receptionist Jack D. Zencheck Chief Procurement Officer G. Gillott Assistant to CPO Open Director, E-Commerce (P Cards)(B2B) Thomas Cannon Director of Accounts Payable Michael Winkler Director of Energy Mgmt & Sustainability Tova Ackerman Director, Purchasing Natalia Volodarsky Purchasing Manager, Scientific T. Singh AP Supervisor A. Butta Administrator, E-Commerce B. O’Farrell Construction Buyer A. Moore Sustainability Coordinator R. Labrew Freezer Program Clerk J. Iurato Travel & Expense L. James Bookkeeper G. Braithwaite Systems Analyst T. Brown Contracts Administrator N. Franco Acquisition Clerk E. Teehan AP Clerk H. Nonnon Acquisitions Clerk R. Osi Contracts Administrator K. Neufville AP Clerk R. Gandolfo Contract Admin. IT A. Villamar Bookkeeper V. Mew Asst. Contract Adm, MRO H. Martinez Bookkeeper P-2-P S. Gonzalez AP Clerk

  7. P-2-P System • Banner for Higher Markets • SciQuest Full Suite (Higher Markets) • Requisition Manager • Order Manager • Spend Director • A/P Director • Sourcing Manager • Contract Manager

  8. P-2-P System • JPMorgan PaymentNet System • P-Card • Enzyme Freezer Program, Alcohol Ordering, Reporting and Inventory System • A/P Director e-Invoicing and Digital Mailroom Automation System

  9. P2P Process 2) A/P DIRECTOR 3 WAY MATCH (5k+) 2 WAY (<5K) 1B) SCAN & CONVERT TO DIGITAL FORMAT & IMPORT DIT DIGITAL MAILROOM

  10. Accounts Payable Automation – E Invoicing E-Invoice Banner SciQuest ACH 3 Way Match

  11. Accounts Payable Automation – E Invoicing E-Invoice Banner SciQuest Direct Data Extraction CXML Conversion ACH 3 Way Match Email Lock Box Fax

  12. Procurement Transformation Project Outline • We hired E&I Consulting to assess and recommend the following: • Technology Assessment • Organization & Operations • Marketing & Communications • Supplier Enablement

  13. Technology • Performed a thorough evaluation of technology implementation • Banner and SciQuest full suite • Identified post-implementation issues • system workflow (configuration and performance) • functionality deficiencies that impact • performance • client satisfaction • Documented and categorized appropriate solutions • Implemented recommended solutions • Documented and categorized outstanding Banner/SciQuest issues • Reinforced the values and benefits of compliance and utilization

  14. Technology • Completed process mapping of the procure-to-pay process • Validated each process step and decision point • Identified opportunities to: • streamline workflow • reduce process time and effort for the campus users • maintain appropriate level of control and oversight • Increase operational efficiencies by implementing reengineered processes resulting from the following mapping exercises: • Processing non-catalog small dollar purchases | Processing Requests greater than $7,500 • Processing Change Orders | Vendor Set Up • Remit-to-Addresses | Processing Invoices • Monitoring Sub-Recipient Process

  15. Organization & Operations • Conducted a formal organizational review to determine alignment with objectives of senior leadership and key internal business partners • Determined need for more formalized strategic vision supported by senior leadership • Developed a 3-5 year strategic plan • Expressed to senior management the role of Procurement to: • Project ROI • Address budget and staff requirements • Identify dependencies in order to achieve the strategy • Recommended utilization of CPO’s skills to concentrate on: • Higher value • Strategic objectives • Delegated appropriate contractual signing authority to: • Increase efficiencies • Minimize risks

  16. Organization & Operations • Established standard institutional procurement terms and conditions and a standard Master Supplier Agreement • Obtained cooperation from the other internal stakeholders including: • Human Resources • Business Affairs • Finance • Environmental Health and Safety • Insurance and Risk Management • Established a formal Procure-to-Pay strategy and structure with shared ownership among: • IT • Finance • Procurement

  17. Organization & Operations • Reviewed the skillsets and capabilities of Procurement staff and determine • Skills and staffing levels were sufficient to meet goals and expectations • Technology related skills were inadequate and needed improvement

  18. Organization & Operations • Performed a Procurement Customer Satisfaction Survey • determined current level of satisfaction • identified key areas of concerns • Survey Results: • 82% satisfied with content and supplier enablementsin eMarketplace • 59% satisfied/very satisfied with service and support received from the Procurement Services organization • 68% understand approval levels • 29% understand competitive bid threshold

  19. Supplier Enablement • Performed supplier enablement to ensure successful hosted or punch-out catalog content for preferred contract suppliers. • Enabled additional SciQuest science pack suppliers to further streamline ordering process for the campus community • Initiated process change requiring suppliers to sign a written agreement to pay the 1.5% technology fee upfront vs. after the fact (current practice) • Deactivated infrequently used suppliers to drive business to the preferred, contract and marketplace enabled suppliers

  20. Marketing & Communications • Developed a formal Marketing and Communications Plan (MCP) to communicate • Vision • Direction • Goals • Collaboration • Invested in the redesign of the Procurement Services website to become the central repository of all procurement and disbursement related information • customer support resources • policies & procedures • how-to-buy • commodity and supplier information • redesigned process documents • Ensured regular communication and collaboration with key procurement stakeholders: • Human Resources • Controller Office • Risk Management • Finance • Environmental Health and Safety

  21. Supplier Enablement • Implemented new process to formally track and report all cost reduction accomplishments • Developed and provided formal cost containment savings and criteria for tracking results • Developed formal and regular communications with senior leadership and the campus community the monthly results of cost reduction initiatives

  22. General Observations Staff • Highly respected by peers in higher education • Skilled and motivated • Frustrated with pace of transition to more strategic and value-added activities • Burdened by non-value duties and responsibilities • Would embrace and benefit from regular professional development opportunities

  23. General Observations Impact of Procurement • Procurement function should be elevated to the highest levels of the organization to support its the strategic objectives of the institution • Designate Procurement as an institutional priority, because it: • Represents second largest percentage of annual operating budget • Interacts with and can positively impact operational efficiencies in virtually every department • Can dramatically impact the Institution's bottom-line by reducing costs and extending the value and potential of every dollar of available funding • Procurement Services should be separated from non-core procurement activities

  24. Internal Challenges & Solutions • This all requires change management • “We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

  25. Acknowledgement Ralph Maier and Melánie Lund E&I Consulting Group (267) 207-9338 rmaier@eandiconsulting.org www.eandiconsulting.org

  26. Conclusion

More Related