160 likes | 307 Views
Ice breaker. Bilab ial sound (兩脣音 )([ b],[p],[m] ) ( 양순음 ). Two. Lip. Presentated by sun hong Hwang. Constructivism. Together build Kant, Giambattista Vico Kunh(1970): “Paradigm shift” Wittgenstein(1986): “Language game”
E N D
Ice breaker Bilabial sound (兩脣音)([b],[p],[m]) (양순음) Two Lip Presentated by sun hong Hwang
Constructivism • Together build • Kant, Giambattista Vico • Kunh(1970): “Paradigm shift” • Wittgenstein(1986): “Language game” • Richard Rotry(1991): “Knowledge and understanding are ethnocentric, and viability is established through obtaining unforced agreement within the community.” • Ex) The earth is square.
Constructivism vs Objectivism 1. To understand and share different viewpoints about the situation. vs To discover a single, objective reality 2. Context is unique to that situation. vs Context is stripped away to get at the essential variables. 3. Values affect the outcome of any inquiry. Vs value-free inquiry.
Constructivists as educators 1.John Dewey(1916) : Situated learning and learning by doing. 2.Jerome Bruner(1966) : Discovery learning. 3.Vygotsky : Learning by collaboration. 4. Lave & Wenger : Learning by coparticipation.
Cognitive constructivism and Sociocultural constructivism. • PC(Personal computer) is Piaget and NC(Network computer) is Vygotsky. Early 1900 Mid 1900 Late 1900 Behaviorism Cognitivism Constructivism Cognitive constructivism
Instructional system design • Skinner and Gagne • Behavioristic and Army-based instruction. • Determine needs, problems, or purposes for instructionAnalyze instructional goals, learners, and settings. Design instructional plans, activities and materials. Evaluate processes and outcomes.
Discovery learning • Bruner’s design of the social studies curriculum in the 1960 2. The problem is that students discover what teachers ask them to discover. 3. C: Think of “discover” as “invention”, a personal construction.
Zone of proximal development 1. Zone that learners can solve the problem only with adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers. – “joint” cognition. 2.C:Focus moves from how we teach to how we design a learning environments
Scaffolding • It includes the support or affordances of the environment. 2. It suggests a guiding and teaching of the learner toward some well-defined end. “Structural” metaphor 3. C: It must be viewed as a learning environment- as supporting the growth of the learner.
Cognitive Apprenticeship • Engaging learners in cognitive and metacognitive activities that involve the authentic use of information is a central goal in our instruction design. • Ex) Lave and Wenger’s AA model
Coaching A teacher as a coach provides the scaffold for the learner. This is becoming common rhetoric in instructional theory, and the constructivist “movement” has been a primary stimulus for this shift in teacher/trainer role.
Context • Context is a variable to make a generalized case. • C: Context cross-over generalization is a problematic. Ex) situated cognition.
Learner control • Teacher-centered and computer-controlled instructional approaches take responsibility away from the learner. – Learners’ control by a teacher. 2. C: Learners are people who control their learning.
Assessment • The most undeveloped part of constructivism. “Thorndike won over Dewey.” • Performance assessment, portfolios, authentic assessment. • The test is embedded within the activity. Ex) medial school.
Collaborative learning • The central strategy of constructivism • To promote the dialogical interchange and reflexivity.