1 / 47

Online CME – An Update

Online CME – An Update. Review of June 2005 Bernard M. Sklar, M.D., M.S. www.cmelist.com/list.htm bersklar@netcantina.com. Plan of Presentation. Results of Recent Surveys Types of Instruction Physician Use of CME and Online CME Obstacles to Physician Use Predictions

oberon
Download Presentation

Online CME – An Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Online CME – An Update • Review of June 2005 • Bernard M. Sklar, M.D., M.S. • www.cmelist.com/list.htm • bersklar@netcantina.com

  2. Plan of Presentation • Results of Recent Surveys • Types of Instruction • Physician Use of CME and Online CME • Obstacles to Physician Use • Predictions • (This report summarizes my most recent review and does not include much of the past data. (To see details of past data, please contact me at bersklar@netcantina.com)

  3. Master’s Thesis • This review is based on the June 2005 update of the database that I created for my master’s thesis, The Current Status of Online Continuing Medical Education (June 2000). Find the thesis online at http://www.cmelist.com/mastersthesis • The June 2000 thesis was based on a review of the CME literature and a survey of online CME done in February 2000.

  4. How Was the Survey Done? • The original survey was done by searching multiple search engines using the search string “online + continuing + medical +education” • Following up leads from those searches • Information from ACCME • Email from viewers and CME providers

  5. Updating the Database • For the past several years, I have relied on contacts from Online CME providers and users to add sites to my list • I add 3-4 new sites each month (and remove those sites that go offline

  6. Description of the List Each entry shows the name and URL of the site, when I last visited, how many credit hours are available, who awards the credit, the cost per unit, when the educational material was last updated, a statement about financial support, a description of the site and its contents and links to individual courses found at the site.

  7. Where is the List? • The Annotated List of Online CME is found at www.cmelist.com/list.htm

  8. Extensive Updates • I have been maintaining the list for eight years, beginning in 1997 • The database was updated for my master’s thesis in February 2000, and every six months since. • From November 2004 through mid-June 2005, I visited and updated the review of each site on the list.

  9. Database Created from List The database contains information about the 284 sites offering CME in mid-June 2005. This information includes the number of activities, number of hours of instruction, types of instruction, target audiences, cost to users, the name of the accrediting organization and sources of financial support.

  10. Growth of Sites, Activities and Hours I

  11. Growth of Sites, Activities and Hours II

  12. Growth of large sites (offering more than 100 Credit Hours)

  13. Size of Sites – June 2005

  14. The Largest Sites June 2005 - I

  15. The Largest Sites June 2005 - 2

  16. Fee Structure – Free Sites • There has been a rapid growth in the number of sites offering free CME – from 98 sites (50%) in December 2001 to 177 sites (70%) in June 2005. • There has been a similar rapid growth in the number of free credit-hours – from 1979 hours (11%) in December 2001 to 5075 hours (20%) in June 2005

  17. Fee Structure – Pay for Credit Sites • There has been very little change in the median fee for a credit hour. The bulk of the fee instruction (70-80%) continues to cost $5 to $15 per credit hour

  18. Fee Structure by Site June 2005

  19. Hourly Fee Structure June 2005

  20. Financial Support Summary: There has been very little change in relative percentages of financial support since December, 2001. But as the number of free sites increases, the number of fee sites decreases

  21. Financial Support June 2005

  22. Primary Care and Specialty Sites • Family Practice and Internal Medicine content continues to dominate the Primary Care sites (about 40% of sites). • Cardiology, Psychiatry, Infectious Disease/HIV, and Oncology content appear most frequently (about 20% of sites for each specialty). • Many sites offer instruction for more than one specialty group

  23. Specialty – Primary Care June 2005

  24. Subspecialties June 2005

  25. Sites by Specialty-June 2005- Other • 38 sites (14%) offer subjects of interest to many specialists: ethics, legal, practice management, risk management, tobacco cessation, addiction, alcoholism, genetics, basic science • Many other specialties are included at 5 or fewer sites

  26. Eight “Different” Sites June 2005 - I • CE Medicus has no CME of its own, but offers access without fee to about 6285 activities produced by six content providers. Instruction is free. • Doctor’s Guide also has no CME of its own, but offers descriptions of over 1800 activities (free and fee) with links to those courses • Digiscript contains many hundreds of audio and video slide lectures recorded at medical meetings. The yearly charge is $400. Someactivities offer CME and others do not. The site is searchable by medical topic and by sponsoring organization. You may have to pay an additional fee for CME credit by any given sponsor. • University of Wisconsin Professional Courses offer credit for courses on non-medical subjects which could be expected to improve your practice or your life.

  27. Eight “Different” Sites June 2005 - II • Stanford SKOLAR offers credit for performing Internet literature searches on topics of your own interest • MerckMedicus CME Credit Program for Searching and Researching. Physicians can earn up to 25 CME credits per calendar year for every hour they spend researching medical questions, reading online medical references, or gathering information for patients on MerckMedicus • Challenger now requires subscribers to buy a CDROM for each course. Once you purchase that CD, you have unlimited access to the website corresponding to that course. Thus, it is no longer “pure” online CME; I have included the number of Challenger’s courses and hours in this report for sake of consistency. • American College of Cardiology Self-Selected CME allows subscribers to earn credits for reading parts of articles of interest.

  28. Email Reminders June 2005 It is becoming increasingly common for the larger sites to send email reminders on request of the users about their new courses. At least 40 sites are now doing this regularly

  29. Types of Instruction • There has been very little change in the proportion of instruction types since December 2001. Text (with or without graphics) remains the dominant mode, followed by slide-audio or slide-video lectures, case-based interactive and question-and-answer instruction. • For definitions of these and other types of online instruction, see Types of Online CME Instruction Defined

  30. Types of Instruction June 2005

  31. More about Question & Answer Instruction • Only 11 sites (4%) feature Q&A, BUT the number of hours is relatively large (3423). Some larger sites are: • Challenger - 2050 hours • TheAnswerPage – 300 hours • Ecore Family Practice – 40 hours • Familypractice.com - 30 hours • Am Acad Orthopedic Self-Assessment – 75 hours • Am Acad Pediatrics Self-Assessment – 40 hours • Medical Education Opportunities – 20 hours • Orthopedics Hyperguide – 50 hours • Total about 3423 hours (14 % of all CME hours)

  32. CME Participation by Location Based on ACCME Figures for 2004 • Live meetings and conferences account for 62.6% of “physician-registrants” • Home study CME (“enduring materials”) and journals account for 23.6% of physician-registrants • Online CME accounts for 13.8% of physician-registrants

  33. Physician Usage of Online CME • Physician usage of online CME is increasing, and now accounts for about 14% of all CME • According to ACCME: • 1997: 13,115 physician-registrants (0.34%) • 1998: 37,879 physician-registrants (1.03%) • 1999: 79,536 physician-registrants (1.79%) • 2000: 181,922 physician-registrants (3.57%) • 2001: 230,055 physician-registrants (4.44%) • 2002: 329,110 physician-registrants (6.08%) • 2004: 895,120 physician-registrants (13.8%)

  34. Changes and Trends I • There is a gradual upward trend in the numbers of sites, courses and hours (about 16% increase over the past 18 months) • Some of that upward trend is “new”; some is accounted for by counting sites not previously found • There has been another 50% increase in the number of free CME hours (5074 vs. 3380) over the 18 months. There has been little change in the specialty groups targeted, types of instruction or the sources of financial support (except that the number of small one-disease free sites seems to be growing).

  35. Changes and Trends II • Number of physician-registrants for online CME went up from 181,922 (3.57%) in 2000 to 230,055 (4.44%) in 2001 to 329,110 (6.08%) in 2002 to 899,390 (14%) in 2004. • The number of physicians registering for online CME has doubled in the past two years.

  36. Why is Online CME use Still So Low? I • These observations about the causes of the “low” use of Online CME are still true, BUT much less true than before: • Some physicians are still uneasy with computers and the Internet • Some physicians are still unaware of online CME or don’t know how to find it • Much live CME, especially at the hospital, is convenient, free and offers collegial interaction • Many doctors still find attending their yearly specialty meeting satisfying and sufficient

  37. Why is Online CME Use Still So Low? II • These observations remain true, BUT, again, to a lesser extent than in past years: • A series of “gates” for the user to pass through • Navigation: Download and install plug-ins • Registration hassle • Fear of giving out license, DEA, credit card • Paying in advance for content you can’t view • Get content free, leave without paying • Each site has a different procedure and password

  38. Why Choose One Online CME Site Over Another? • “Look and Feel” • Your specialty’s “official” site • Price (lower is better; free is best) • Preference for Type of Instruction • Email reminders (the more frequent the better) • Part of larger medical site • Help with CME reporting • Recommendation by colleagues, medical group • Special arrangements with physician group

  39. What do Physicians Want? • Do physicians really want online CME? • (I believe that, with usage now at 14%, the answer is YES)

  40. A Long Term Solution • I believe that: • Eventually, CME will be integrated with the physician’s daily practice life • Systems will be developed which allow a computer program to “know” when a physician is making a mistake or needs additional information • The system will present instruction on the spot to help the physician do the right thing

  41. Other Problems to Solve • Another problem will be to prove that a given CME activity actually improves physician performance. • For now, CME providers and evaluating groups will need to settle for some lesser measure, such as the difference in scores between pre-tests and post-tests, or statements by “experts” that the course will correct the deficiency.

  42. Opportunities for Research • More sophisticated (and expensive) methods of evaluation exist, such as reviewing physician charts or interviewing patients • This is a great opportunity for research.

  43. Conclusions I • The number of online CME activities and credits is growing rapidly Online CME is becoming nicer to look at, with more graphics, lots more audio and video, and a bit more interactive programming

  44. Conclusions II • The percentage of CME hours earned online has risen to about 14% • Barriers to usage are coming down • There is very little proof that any kind of standalone CME, whether live, home study or online, and regardless of mode of instruction, is useful in changing physician practice • Results of most studies indicate that a set of educational interventions will be needed to accomplish behavior change

  45. Conclusions III • The future lies in the integration of medical practice, quality assessment and user-specific CME • The challenges and opportunities are great

  46. Important URLs • Master’s thesis: www.cmelist.com/mastersthesis/ • My home page: www.cmelist.com • Online CME list: www.cmelist.com/list.htm • Definitions of types of online CME instruction: www.cmelist.com/Instruction_Types_defined.htm • ACCME Annual Report 2004

  47. Questions or Comments? • Send email to bersklar@netcantina.com

More Related