460 likes | 600 Views
ACORDE and Cosmic Rays Physics at LHC S. Kartal University of Istanbul -Turkey C.E. Pagliarone Univeristy of Cassino & INFN Pisa. On the behalf of the ACORDE Collaboration. Outline. Motivations ACORDE (the A LICE CO smic R ays D etector) Physics Goals
E N D
ACORDE and Cosmic Rays Physics at LHCS. KartalUniversity of Istanbul -TurkeyC.E. PagliaroneUniveristy of Cassino & INFN Pisa On the behalf of the ACORDE Collaboration
Outline • Motivations • ACORDE (the ALICE COsmic Rays Detector) • Physics Goals • Other Cosmic Ray Activities at Cern • Recent Results from ACORDE • New Proposal for CR at ALICE
Motivations (I) • Our primary goal is to study muons attaching to extensive air showers initiated by primary CRs interacting in the upper atmosphere, is to study high multiplicity muon bundles which might signify: • High energy physics effects in the primary interaction that are not included in current Monte Carlo programs simulating UHECR: • Coherent effects in nucleus-nucleus interactions • Coherent pion production • Primarily at energies above 1016 eV
Motivations (II) • It seems highly desirable to employ a multi-100 million $ detector and its infrastructure for multiple purposes • Hence, to use one of the large LHC detectors to help elucidate some of the UHECR puzzles is a “highly beneficial” activity, involving a relatively small additional effort • We are proposing to use ALICE
Tracking cosmic muons in ALICE The main advantages of such possibility are: - The flux of cosmic at the ALICE location is shielded by 30 m rock, with an energy threshold of 15 GeV or less (much lower than for large underground experiments, hence a much higher rate). - The rock composition over ALICE is well known. The surface near the ALICE location is flat within at least 100 m radius, so its effect on absorption and energy loss may be evaluated. - The ALICE tracking detectors may be tuned to reconstruct the energy and charge state of muons with good resolution up to several hundred GeV.
High Energy Cosmic Rays Cosmic ray showers: Dynamics of the high energy particle spectrum is crucial
Motivations (III) • A secondary goal of our muon studies is to better understand the mass composition and energy spectrum of primary CR nuclei; • Observing, simultaneously, the muonic content and the EM component, via surface arrays, provides a handle on the composition primarily for 1-100 PeV
ACORDE Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons TPC TRD TOF
The ACORDE Detector 20x373 cm Plastic Scintillators 60 Double Layer Modules
CR physics with ALICE • Two main aspects: • Better knowledge - through the study of pp, pA and AA collision events - of the hadronic interactions at high energy ----> interest in the interaction of CR with atmosphere • Measurements of cosmic rays with ALICE itself and (possibly) additional detectors ---> properties of the m spectrum at ground • Additional use of cosmics in ALICE for calibration and alignment; • ACORDE + TPC + TRD + TOF • Sofisticated tracking system, precise measurement of particle momentum and muon energy up to 1-2 TeV (B = 0.5 T); • Capability to track high density of muons
Physics topics of interest • Multi-muon events most promising CosmoAleph measurements • Inclusive muons (single muon) L3+C measurements • Cosmic ray point sources, Antiproton flux limit Large area coincident experiment
CHALLENGE: L3+C measurements • “Measurement of the shadowing of high energy cosmic rays by the Moon: A search for TeV-energy antiprotons”, Astroparticle Phys. 23(2005)p411. • “Observation of a Flare Signal from a fixed position in the hemisphere through muons with L3+C”, ICRC 2005. • “A search for low velocity exotic particles with the L3+C spectrometer”, ICRC 2005. • “Search for Kolar-like Measurement of the atmospheric muon spectrum from 20 to 3000GeV”, • Phys. Lett. B (2004)p15. • “The L3+C detector, a unic tool-set to study cosmic rays”,NIMA 488(2002)p209.
Simulation programs to explain the data CORSIKA code Hadronic interaction models : QGSJET, VENUS, DPMJET, NEXUS, SIBYLL … The models are tuned using data from accelerators p-p, p-pbarA-A collisions. Usually at Tevatron energies ~ 1015 eV or s1/2 = 630 or 900 GeV LHC energy s1/2 = 14 TeV proton with E = 1017 eV with fixed target Much above the energy of the knee of cosmic rays (E=3·1015 eV) The most relevant measurements for ALICE are : the pseudo-rapidity distributions of identified hadrons the hadron transverse momentum distributions Considerable interesting should be the study of N-N interactions
The muon spectrum at sea level • Transport Equations describe the propagation of particles through the Atmosphere, resulting in a m-flux (zenith angle and energy dependent) and muon charge ratio at sea level. • Muon momentum spectrum; • Muon charge ratio;
Multiplicity distribution of charged particles with different hadronic interaction models Heck, Nucl. Phys B, 2003
The muon P(m) spectrum In spite of great experimental efforts, measurements of the muon flux and energy distribution at the ground level show relative discrepancies up to 15-20 % in the region 10-1000 GeV/c Vertical differential muon spectrum predicted by a number of models. Also predictions differ by up to 30 %.
Muon charge ratio Rm Determined mainly by the behaviour of the inclusive cross section in the fragmentation region. It contains information on the charge and mass composition of the primary flux. Vertical muon charge ratio predicted by several models: differences by 10-20 % in the region 10-1000 GeV/c.
The trigger conditions Running during standard ALICE data taking imposes stringent conditions for cosmic trigger: • low trigger rate (few Hz) • live time constrictions (statistical problems) Inclusive muons trigger 450 Hz (too high) We can take only vertical muons 60-70 Hz (high) Statistical problems to measure : • Single muon momentum distribution and charge ratio • Point source in a standard way • Antiproton flux limit Multi-muon events few Hz
76 tracks in the TPC Multi-muon events COAMOALEPH: Astroparticle Physics 19 (2003) 513-523 Multim. events Emth= 70 GeV Standard LEP trigger : cosmic muons deposit energy in the e.m. and hadronic calorimeter Selection: events without reconstructed vertex at least one track p>5 GeV/c 580000 events during 1997-99 runs t = 174 days of data taking t = 20 days effective run time
Multi-muon events ALEPH ALICE Fe 1012<E<1017 eV p 1012<E<1017 eV
Reminder of Results from ALEPH • Conclusions (1) on frequency: • The bulk of the data could be successfully described by standard production phenomena • The muon multiplicity distribution favors a composition that changes from light to heavier elements with increasing energy around the “knee” at 1015-15.5 eV • The five highest multiplicity events occur with a frequency which is almost an order of magnitude above the simulation
Reminder of Results from ALEPH • Conclusions (2) on properties: • High multiplicity muon bundles are almost parallel, with the muons distributed uniformly over the ALEPH area 4x3 m2 • The interaction characteristics of forward particle production at energies beyond the current accelerator range (Eprim > 3x1015 eV) cannot be explored • Even in the accelerator range, forward particle production that is relevant for CR studies is poorly understood • Similar results found by DELPHI and L3
Muon energy measurements Some contribution to disentangle among primaries could come from the measurement of the energy of each muon. This is a really new measurement never done in cosmic ray underground apparatus Average energy of muons in the core for different number m in the core of the shower. Proton andFeprimary E = 1015 eV
Muon Angular (q) distribution Angular distribution of muons impacting the ground upon the ALICE cavern; Angular distribution of muons reaching the ALICE magnet.
Muon DP distribution 1M atmospheric m generated at the surface, pointing to the ALICE’s IP DP=PSurface(m)-PMagnet(m)
CRALPProposal for Cosmic Rays with ALICE and P2 Plans for Cosmic Ray studies at CERN combining Surface Array at P2 with ACORDEUnderground Array at UX2 and ALICE TPC detector at UX2
Concept: 30 m of rock E > 20 GeV
ALICE TPC/TRD The TPC diameter is 5 m and it is 5.1 m long Outside the TPC at 2.9 < r < 3.7 m is a TRD 7 m long
The next step • We have two existing surface arrays now taking data at P2 and P4: • At P4: there are 3 rows of 7, 6 and 7 1m2 counters in an area 10 x 60 m2 (since Fall 2001)
The next step • At P2: there are 40 0.5m2 counters in 6 rows covering an area 50 x 70 m2 (since 2000) • The two sets of arrays have been running consistently since April 2005 • The goal here is to look for coincidences over a range of about 8 km
Plans for counter design Working on: Design of the Sc/fiber/box Base design HV setup Readout TDC/ADC
With 16 fibers • MIP = 27 • FWHM = 31 • HV = 2000 V • Allow for up to 20 mips 27 ch. PULSE HEIGHT from prototype:
Proposal: • To put about 100 additional counters above ground at P2, • 5-10 (?) counters above ALICE, with • Another 100 counters underground around ALICE • Trigger: on counters above and around ALICE; readout ALICE and all P2 counters • Schedule: • Discussions with ALICE are underway and there was already interest from ALICE (TDR)
Fe No. of muons Separation protons No. EM showers Studies from QGSJET CORSIKA MC (E > 70 GeV)
Measurements of the very forward energy flux (including diffraction) and of the total cross section are essential for the understanding of cosmic ray events At LHC pp energy: 104 cosmic events km-2 year-1 sr-1 > 107 events at the LHC in one day LHC TeV Integral flux of high energy cosmic rays
Interpreting cosmic ray data depends on hadronic simulation programs The forward region is poorly known/constrained Models differ by factor 2 or more Need forward particle/energy measurements: e.g. dE/d… High Energy Cosmic Rays
The next step: • V. Avati et al: “a larger underground array (typically 400 m2) with precise muon chambers complemented by a surface array …. to study further with much larger statistics the properties of the outstanding highest multiplicity events.” • We propose to use the ALICE TPC and TRD (~50 m2), with a smaller overburden (E > 20 GeV) and a much longer data taking time • Combined with the existing CR shower array above ALICE at P2 to measure EM content, and • Combined with additional counters underground both above and around the ALICE detector