1 / 36

MIS 696A Final Presentation

MIS 696A Final Presentation. Victor Benjamin, Joey Buckman, Xiaobo Cao, Weifeng Li, Zirun Qi, Lee Spitzley, Yun Wang, Rich Yueh. Introduction Literature review Research gaps Data collection Results Conclusion. Agenda. What is MIS? Past work vs. current work Conference papers

odessa-kaufman
Download Presentation

MIS 696A Final Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIS 696A Final Presentation Victor Benjamin, Joey Buckman, Xiaobo Cao, Weifeng Li, Zirun Qi, Lee Spitzley, Yun Wang, Rich Yueh

  2. Introduction • Literature review • Research gaps • Data collection • Results • Conclusion Agenda

  3. What is MIS? • Past work vs. current work • Conference papers • Lower submission-to-acceptance time Introduction

  4. Artificial Intelligence and Information Retrieval • 1967: The successful knowledge-based program Dendral is built • 1995: Bayesian method developed for determining atomic positions • 1999: EcoCyc is built to query and explore the genetics of E.Coli Timeline of Greatness

  5. Collaboration • 1971: Delphi method proposed as group communication structure • 1987: Foundation for the study of GSS • 1991: Benefits and drawbacks of GSS established • 1996: Groupware Grid proposed Timeline of Greatness

  6. Database • 1961: IDS developed • 1970: E.F. Codd published article on relational technology • 1973: Michael Stonebraker developed Ingres/IBM with System R • 1976: Peter Chen and ER Model • 1980: First database build on Oracle SQL Timeline of Greatness

  7. Decision Science • 1980: Framework for DSS developed by Ralph Sprague • 1987: Foundation of GDSS • 2000: Proof of 2-Player Zero Sum Game Equilibrium Timeline of Greatness

  8. Economics • 1985: Pricing of computer services • 1988: Switching costs and lock-in theories • 1993: Productivity paradox of IT • 1996: Emergence of E-Commerce • 1999: Economics of global IT Timeline of Greatness

  9. Human-Computer Interaction • 1952: Englebart begins defining information manipulation problems • 1962: Licklider outlines “Man-Computer Symbiosis” goals • 1965: First “computer mouse” unveiled (SRI) • 1977: Xerox PARC explores WYSIWYG displays • 1977: “ZOG: A Man-Machine Communication Philosophy” (CMU) Timeline of Greatness

  10. Social Issues and Informatics • 1988: Adaptive technology required for team differences • 1994: Fair use and digital data • 1998: Trust in global virtual teams • 2000: Framework to study technology in organizations • 2001: Intellectual property in an open information environment Timeline of Greatness

  11. Systems Analysis and Design • 1968: Systems Analysis became a formal discipline • 1972: Information hiding was promoted • 1979: “Structured Design” was published by Edward Yourdon • 1980: Workflow emerges • 1986: Introduction of object-oriented development • 1997: UML 1.1 was submitted Timeline of Greatness

  12. Hsinchun Chen University of Arizona MIS Hall of Fame

  13. Andrew B. Whinston University of Texas at Austin MIS Hall of Fame

  14. Ronald E. Rice University of California Santa Barbara MIS Hall of Fame

  15. IzakBenbasat University of British Columbia MIS Hall of Fame

  16. Jay F. Nunamaker University of Arizona MIS Hall of Fame

  17. Previous groups examined journal papers • Journal papers have a lag time of 1 – 2 years • Good indicator of long-term trends and historical information Research Gaps

  18. Conference papers • A good indicator of where the field is today • A predictor of the near future • Larger quantity of papers Our Focus

  19. Conference papers are not easy to collect (not in a single database) • Some conferences cannot be collected online Data Collection

  20. After a search of each database we decided to collect: ICIS, AMCIS, CSCW, HICSS, KDD, SIGIR, WWW • Time Frame: 2008-2012 Data Collection

  21. Data: • Title, Abstract, Keywords of total 6,036 papers. Data Collection

  22. Different conferences have different website patterns (HTML tags, structures etc.) • We programmed text scrapers in Python and PHP for different website patterns Data Collection

  23. Data Sources • Microsoft Academic Search • ACM Proceedings • Official Conference Websites Data Collection

  24. Source Comparison Data Collection

  25. Microsoft Academic – JSON Parsing Data Collection

  26. ACM Proceedings IE – Regular Expression Data Collection

  27. Results Data Collection

  28. Latent Dirichlet Allocation • Algorithm used for topic modeling • Originates from computer science in 2002 • Some open source tools exist to help researchers employ LDA What is LDA?

  29. Computes chance of certain words appearing together • Also looks for word groups that appear exclusive from one another • Assumes each document can be a mixture of various topics • Returns clusters of words to user and topical make-up of each document How LDA works

  30. Suppose you have the following set of sentences: • I like to eat broccoli and bananas. • I ate a banana and spinach smoothie for breakfast. • Chinchillas and kittens are cute. • My sister adopted a kitten yesterday. • Look at this cute hamster munching on a piece of broccoli. • According to LDA • Sentences 1 and 2: 100% Topic A • Sentences 3 and 4: 100% Topic B • Sentence 5: 60% Topic A, 40% Topic B • Topic A: 30% broccoli, 15% bananas, 10% breakfast, 10% munching, … (at which point, you could interpret topic A to be about food) • Topic B: 20% chinchillas, 20% kittens, 20% cute, 15% hamster, … (at which point, you could interpret topic B to be about cute animals) An example of LDA • Example source: http://blog.echen.me/2011/08/22/introduction-to-latent-dirichlet-allocation/

  31. Suppose you have the following set of sentences: • I like to eat broccoli and bananas. • I ate a banana and spinach smoothie for breakfast. • Chinchillas and kittens are cute. • My sister adopted a kitten yesterday. • Look at this cutehamster munching on a piece of broccoli. • According to LDA • Sentences 1 and 2: 100% Topic A • Sentences 3 and 4: 100% Topic B • Sentence 5: 60% Topic A, 40% Topic B • Topic A: 30% broccoli, 15% bananas, 10% breakfast, 10% munching, … (at which point, you could interpret topic A to be about food) • Topic B: 20% chinchillas, 20% kittens, 20% cute, 15% hamster, … (at which point, you could interpret topic B to be about cute animals) An example of LDA • Example source: http://blog.echen.me/2011/08/22/introduction-to-latent-dirichlet-allocation/

  32. Trending toward technical research • Away from behavioral research • No more TAM • Future work: broaden range of conferences Conclusion

More Related