1 / 11

EU-Structural Fonds Evaluation

Dive into the ongoing evaluation of EU funds programs (2007-2013) distributed in Saxony-Anhalt among priority axes. Explore the comprehensive plan of evaluation, types of indicators, and possible themes for future strategies.

ofelia
Download Presentation

EU-Structural Fonds Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EU-Structural Fonds Evaluation Evaluation SeminarBrussels, 26.06.08

  2. Saxony-Anhalt

  3. Distribution of EU EFRE, ESF and ELER/EFF among priority axes Total 3.4 bn € EU-funds Programs 2007-2013

  4. ongoing evaluation: 31.03. every year: annual report (ongoing evaluation and themes - firstly 2010) 30.09. every year: midterm review (ongoing evaluation and themes- firstly 2009, decision of new themes for next year) Plan of Evaluation 01/2008: implementation of steering group 04/2008: call for tenders (13 possible applicants, but only 3 offers) 08/2008: award 09/2008: finding of themes for 2009 03/2009: review of list of indicators 2007 2008 2009 2010 ……… 2015 2010: evaluation of all funds 09/2015: review of pro- cedure strategic evaluations to rebuilt strategy and programs (max. 3)

  5. Steering Group • subgroup of Steering Committee • members are • ministries, • Social Partners (including Centre of Competence) • statistic authority • regularly quarterly sessions

  6. Types of Indicators • Input (financial indicators) • Output (mainly) • Result (only few) • Impact (context) • All together: • project indicators: 59 (each quantified and connected to certain levels of financial plan) • context indicators: 40 (each quantified)

  7. Groups of Indicators • N1 = persons / participants • N2 = financial resources (monthly reported) • N3 = number (how many projects) • N4 = funded areas • N5 = funded length, routes • N6 = masses, quantities, • N7 = whereabouts • N8 = horizontal themes

  8. Possible themes (provisional) • reasons and solutions against school failure • urban dimension • poverty and discrimination • demographic change • revolving funds • whereabouts of participants after 6 month • structure of jobs regarding qualification and income (especially jobs for women)

  9. Conclusion Who wants to steer a ship, needs information! Who wants to steer needs a steer ! • Information society and eGovernment ! Who wants to steer has to use information and steer! - otherwise:

  10. Ways to same objective!

  11. Big success! Thanks for your attention! www.europa.sachsen-anhalt.de

More Related