1 / 10

Case 11-2: The United L/N Plant (Scraps & Defects)

Case 11-2: The United L/N Plant (Scraps & Defects). Stanley Chan Stanley Htun. Sarah Lehman Joseph Bao. Background. Libby-Owens-Ford – Parent Company Major Producer of Glass Products Two subsidiaries:. 1. Rossford Plant Produces Raw Float Glass Standard Cost Center. 2. United L/N

olathe
Download Presentation

Case 11-2: The United L/N Plant (Scraps & Defects)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Case 11-2: The United L/N Plant (Scraps & Defects) Stanley Chan Stanley Htun Sarah Lehman Joseph Bao

  2. Background • Libby-Owens-Ford – Parent Company • Major Producer of Glass Products • Two subsidiaries: 1. Rossford Plant • Produces Raw Float Glass • Standard Cost Center 2. United L/N • Glass Fabrication Plant • Strategic Business Unit

  3. Fabrication Process 1. Rossford Plant • Each fabrication process treated as individual cost center • Each department has a WIP inventory • All processes require human intervention • Separate departments 2.United L/N • Fabrication process is in-line, automated, and computerized • Just-In-Time and Pull Method • No idle WIP inventory • Human intervention for maintenance and repair only

  4. Product Costing System 1.Rossford Plant • Separate cost pools 2.United L/N • One large pool of costs Cut and Trim • Cut and Trim • Edged • Shaped • Inspect, packaging, shipping Edging Shaping Inspection, packaging, and shipping

  5. Problems at United L/N • Inefficient furnace operation • Furnace operation led to gaps and increased scarp • Problems at the cutting and edging process led to downtime at the furnace operation – Lost productivity • Decreased plant yield due to scrap

  6. Q1: Who gets charged for Scrap? Rossford Plant • Charge-back maybe inappropriate - Or - • Charge-back maybe too high United L/N • The problem with scrap is caused by imperfections in the raw glass from Rossford rather than the process • Therefore scrap variance should be charged to Rossford

  7. Q1: United L/N Compromise • Modify Scrap Costing System • Track Separately Scrapped Materials, and Scrapped Overhead • Charge back Rossford for Scrapped Glass Material (if glass is defective) • Charge Scrapped Overhead to United L/N Scrap Variance Account

  8. Q2: How could management determine the specific causes of defects in the scrapped units? • Temporary Program: Thorough inspections for a limited time • After, AQL Inspections / Monitoring throughout the process • Results: Short-term, the fully automated plant will be run as a more traditional plant – carrying work in progress, having some buffer.

  9. Q3: What could be done to solve the problems with the furnace inefficiency and ineffectiveness? • Inspections before glass is loaded for cutting • Keep some buffer stockpile in front of the furnace • Efficiencies will go down, but will hopefully be offset by the savings

  10. Questions?

More Related