1 / 14

Get your proposal funded

Get your proposal funded. Tom Wagner Program Director Antarctic Geology and Geophysics Program. Improving your proposal—Part I (and biasing your Program Officer in your favor). Do mail reviews Volunteer to be on a panel Suggest reviewers for your proposal

oleg
Download Presentation

Get your proposal funded

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Get your proposal funded Tom Wagner Program Director Antarctic Geology and Geophysics Program

  2. Improving your proposal—Part I (and biasing your Program Officer in your favor) • Do mail reviews • Volunteer to be on a panel • Suggest reviewers for your proposal • Do mail reviews (yes, we said this twice)

  3. Improving your proposal—Part II • Plan your logistics carefully • Initial request will guide final plan • Submit an Operational Requirements Worksheet (ORW) with proposal • Be fully aware of available resources • Ask! They are extensive…

  4. Facilities

  5. USARC: United States Antarctic Resource Center Geospatial data Air photos, geologic & topo maps, related data Served digitally & hard copy Established: Decades… Constructed: USGS Operating award: $500K/Year Staff: ~Two full-time

  6. Antarctic Multibeam Synthesis Data Portal Contents Bathymetric data from most Gould and Palmer cruises Established at LDEO in 2002 Construction: NSF-OPP Operating award: $150K/Year Staff: Various

  7. Common pitfalls • Does not respond to reviewer criticisms • Unaware of difference between intellectual merit and broader impact • Not gauging proposal to requirements of work • One field season or two? • Two years of funding or three? • Failure to cite relevant literature • Some is tough to find…

  8. Resources NSF Awards Database:nsf.gov/awardsearch/ Antarctic Master Directory:gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data/portals/amd/ Byrd Polar Research Center:www-bprc.mps.ohio-state.edu Antarctic Research Series:Volumes from AGU United States Antarctic Resources Center:usarc.usgs.gov National Snow and Ice Data Center:nsidc.org International Symposium on Antarctic Earth Sciences:Proceedings Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research:scar.org

  9. Resources II Journals:Terra Antarctica Books:Antarctic Marine Geology by John Anderson (Cambridge, 1999) Antarctic Multibeam Synthesis:www.marine-geo.org Antarctic Sediment Core Repository:www.arf.fsu.edu Antarctic Rock Repository:bprc.mps.ohio-state.edu/rr/samples/ WAIS:igloo.gsfc.nasa.gov/wais/ ANDRILL:www.andrill.org SHALDRIL:shaldril.rice.edu

  10. Improving your proposal—Part V Do you know our average mail review score?

  11. 4.0/5.0—Very Good

  12. What are the ultimate implications of your work? • Would it get the cover of Nature? • Is it framed to answer a globally relevant question, not just Antarctic? • Bounce ideas off us. We breath, drink, eat, and sleep proposals and reviews.

  13. Other Opportunities • Crosscutting and NSF-wide programs • CAREER • REU • RUI • Other Programs at NSF • Biology • Geosciences

  14. International Collaboration • Diverse array of opportunities in Antarctica • Many countries have research programs that encourage partnerships • Required for IPY

More Related