200 likes | 343 Views
LEGAL TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY ENGINEER. David Redding 704-227-1059 Jorge Cowley 704-293-4333 (The Cowley Law Firm) . WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG. DPSG was formed to address the recurring legal issues experienced by design professionals
E N D
LEGAL TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY ENGINEER David Redding 704-227-1059 Jorge Cowley 704-293-4333 (The Cowley Law Firm) WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
DPSG was formed to address the recurring legal issues experienced by design professionals Drawing on experience advising and defending design professionals in and around North Carolina, from contract negotiation through litigation Recognizing the need for a forum to provide the design professional community a place to share its experiences and aid in the development of practices aimed at avoiding litigation To facilitate discussion, idea-exchange, and alerts on emerging trends and changes in the laws affecting design professionals, as well as serving as a resource for design professionals and their counsel ABOUT DPSG WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
Design error or omission Defective Construction Cost overruns Lost profits Extra Work Delay Failure to approve payment applications TYPES OF CLAIMS WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 1: Expanded Duty of Care WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 1: Expanded Duty of Care • What is the Duty of Care? “The standard of care provides a template against which the finder of fact may measure the actual conduct of the professional.” Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & Associates, P.C. 636 S.E.2d 835, *845 (N.C.App.,2006) WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 1: Expanded Duty of Care • How does the Duty of Care Protect the Engineer? • “The purpose of introducing evidence as to the standard of care in a professional negligence lawsuit ‘is to see if this defendant's actions ‘lived up’ to that standard.” • “Generally this is established by way of expert testimony.” • Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & Associates, P.C. 636 S.E.2d 835, *845 (N.C.App.,2006) WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 1: Expanded Duty of Care • How is the Duty of Care Expanded? • By Contract • “the highest standard” • “best practices” • “best efforts” • By Practice WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 1: Expanded Duty of Care • How will an expanded Duty of Care harm the Engineer? • The minimum is no longer good enough • Anything that can be done, must be done • Lose expert protection WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 1: Expanded Duty of Care • How can an expansion be avoided? • Read the proposed contract • Consult your attorney • Read your E/O policy WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 2: Restricted Contract Administration WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 2: Restricted Contract Administration How often should an engineer visit a project during construction? WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 2: Restricted Contract Administration “. . . intervals appropriate to the stage of the Contractor’s operations: (1) to become generally familiar with and to keep the Owner informed about the progress and the quality of the portion of the Work completed, (2) to endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, and (3) to determine in general if the Work is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents.” A201, 4.2.2 (1997) WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 2: Restricted Contract Administration How is CA restricted by contract? • Limited number of visits • Specified visit interval • Upon request • Vague triggering events WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 2: Restricted Contract Administration Why are restrictions on CA a potential trap? • Cannot agree beforehand how many visits will be sufficient without violating standard of care • Specific interval will likely be violated • Owner not a professional—doesn’t know when a visit needed • Better off with no CA than restricted CA WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 3: One-sided Termination Provisions WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 4: Hidden Responsibility for Means and Methods WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 4: Hidden Responsibility for Means and Methods By the Owner • Via the Contract • “Supervise” • “Inspect” • “Verify” • “Certify” • Via performance WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 4: Hidden Responsibility for Means and Methods By the Contractor • Via CA • Shop Drawings • RFIs • Observation Reports • Certifications WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
TRAP 5: Failure to Control Expectations WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG
David Redding 704-227-1059 Jorge Cowley 704-293-4333 (The Cowley Law Firm) WWW.DESIGNPROFESSIONAL.ORG