1 / 10

Child Poverty and Local Area Agreements

Child Poverty and Local Area Agreements. LAAs: next steps Which indicators? What data? Will Morlidge GOEM. LAAs: next steps. “Refresh” to be completed by LAA partners and GOs by March 2009 (ministerial sign-off April) Issues to be resolved: Reward: guidance expected by Christmas

olive
Download Presentation

Child Poverty and Local Area Agreements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Child Poverty and Local Area Agreements LAAs: next steps Which indicators? What data? Will Morlidge GOEM

  2. LAAs: next steps • “Refresh” to be completed by LAA partners and GOs by March 2009 (ministerial sign-off April) • Issues to be resolved: • Reward: guidance expected by Christmas • Indicators: eg KS3, perception of ASB • Targetry: Whitehall and GOs are working on their negotiating briefs • Data: collection and/or quality assurance of many datasets underway

  3. Which indicators? (1) • NIS includes “baskets of indicators” which: • can impact on your area of work • might be affected by your work • underpin a delivery plan when taken together • Various approaches: • SETF, DCSF, GOEM – policy driven • GOL, CLG – statistically driven

  4. Which indicators? (2) From DCSF, GOEM, GOL and CLG models: 71 NIs identified, 4 were common: • 102 Achievement gap between FSM pupils and peers achieving at Key Stages 2 and 4 • 106 Young people from low income backgrounds progressing to higher education • 116 Proportion of children in poverty (workless households) • 118 Take up of formal childcare by low-income working families

  5. Which indicators? (3) In 2 or 3: • 48 Children KSI • 53 Breastfeeding • 70 Emergency hospital admissions • 72 Foundation Stage (mandatory) • 73-84 Attainment (some mandatory) • 112 Teenage conception • 117 NEET • 187 Fuel poverty

  6. In 1: 1-5 civic participation 9-11 culture 55-56 Obesity 57 Sport 58 Emotional health 61-63 CIC stability Attainment (17 NIs) 104-5 SEN attainment 107-8 BME attainment 151 Employment rate 152, 153, 181 Benefits 158 Decent Homes 161-5 Adult skills 166 Earnings 185 Street cleanliness Which indicators? (4)

  7. Which indicators? (5) • Take up of 116 (1), 118 (1 local), 102 (0) and 106 (0) • Attainment, TP and NEET are well covered • Reliant on less strongly related NIs (eg NI1 is in 8) • But broadly similar to national picture (bar London)

  8. Which indicators? (6) For consideration: • Which are impacts of CP and which does CP impact on? • Are CIC being accidentally screened out? • No link to ASB, drugs or crime • Weak linkages to indicators on adult social exclusion Child Poverty Unit to lead further work

  9. What data?

  10. Any questions? To support the afternoon sessions data packs on available datasets will be circulated for each local area Will Morlidge GOEM will.morlidge@goem.gsi.gov.uk 0115 971 2563

More Related