140 likes | 338 Views
Judge Ehab Maher Elsonbaty Judge of South Sinai Court in Egypt and Visiting Scholar in the Institution for computer and communication law, CCLS, Queen Mary, University of London. E – Commerce and the Applicable Law Rules. E-commerce, growth and effects. Definition of e-commerce (e / mobile)
E N D
Judge Ehab Maher Elsonbaty Judge of South Sinai Court in Egypt and Visiting Scholar in the Institution for computer and communication law, CCLS, Queen Mary, University of London E – Commerce and the Applicable Law Rules
E-commerce, growth and effects • Definition of e-commerce (e / mobile) • Players of e-commerce. * Consumers are for the first time a part of international commercial transactions. * Government procurements / international organizations. • The distance between the “beginning” and the current situation. • Impact on developing countries (small enterprises – transparency in governmental transactions – jobs..) • Numbers and statistics. * Online population 2004, 700 – 900 millions.(%80 are EU + US + Canada – in English). * 36,267, 755 domain names.(850,000 weekly)
A new suite or a different cut? • Are the existing legal systems capable of governing e-commerce transactions? • The Internet is over regulated or not regulated at all? • The need to allow the online transactions the same protection and certainty as the “PAPER WORLD” • Trust, Facilitate and enable more than restrict and ban! • Filling the gaps? • But how and who?
Choice of law rules • Definition of choice of law rules. • Different methods of choice of law rules: • Classical method or theories. (categorization – connecting factors ) • New methods or theories. * Harmonized conflict of law rules. * harmonized substantive rules. (regional – International) * convergence. * Model laws.
Civil and common law, the gap between the legend and the reality! • Many scholars love to claim that the difference between civil law systems and common law systems is wide. • This is not true, it is a tendency to escape from comparative visions and deeper studies. • Both of the legal system have many similarities and they can collaborate together. (European Union for example – more than % 60 of English law is statutes)
Challenges for choice of law rules • Is the classical method the only / best / available solution? • Does the classical method of applicable law capable of interacting with the new developments and changes in all the international and national levels? Globalization for example?
How does e-commerce challenges classical choice of law rules • Identity /person • Location • Material / property • Nationality • Time • Contract (capacity, formation, conclusion, warranties, payment…etc.) • Technology v. law • Cost • Judges, lawyers and other legal professions (old tools for moderns issues)
European / UK approach • E-commerce directive 2000/31/EC. • The Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002. • Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations, Rome 1980. • Proposal for a regulation of the European on the law applicable to non – contractual obligations (ROME II) * Business to business. * Business to consumers. • New commission proposal for services? Nothing new!
Egyptian approach • Draft of e – commerce legislation. * Adopting the UNCITRAL model law on electronic commerce. * The applicable law on e-commerce transactions is still governed by the existing choice of law rules + International conventions (CISG)
The possible solutions for applicable law on e - commerce transactions • The classic choice of law rules? • Uniform choice of law rules? • International substantive rules? • International arbitration? • Cyber space law? • Model laws and contracts?
The solution 1 • Party autonomy v. public policies and mandatory rules. • A greater role for party autonomy. • Open minded vision of public policies. • Consumer contracts and mandatory rules?
The solution 2 • Convergence rules to launch a global legal system to govern e-commerce. (gradual steps) • Wide legal frame work. • On line dispute resolution system: (international organization or any other neutral body such as universities) • Certain. • Reliable. • Fair. • Transparent. • Affordable cost. • Speed. • Legitimate. • Enforcable. • A continuous working process which can accommodate the fast developments of e-commerce with less specifying technological terms and standard.
E – Commerce and the Applicable Law Rules • Thank you for your attention. Judge Ehab M. Elsonbaty, ICCL, CCLS, Queen Mary, University of London e.elsonbaty@qmul.ac.uk ehabelsonbaty@hotmail.com