140 likes | 270 Views
Contros HydroC Methane Sensor at MC118. Presented by Ken Sleeper Seabed Technology Research Center Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute University of Mississippi October 26, 2010. Why Contros. Need for a direct measure of methane on the seafloor PFA, BBLA, CSA and future arrays
E N D
Contros HydroCMethane Sensorat MC118 Presented by Ken Sleeper Seabed Technology Research Center Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute University of Mississippi October 26, 2010
Why Contros • Need for a direct measure of methane on the seafloor • PFA, BBLA, CSA and future arrays • Raman Spectrometer, METS sensor, Mid-IR and Mass Spectrometer • Evaluate new near-IR detector • Chris Martens’ METS shoot out – Survey Mode • Rich Camilli redesign of the power draw – Observatory Mode
Contros near IR CH4 sensor Key Features • Membrane Diffusion • Partial Pressures (Henry’s Law) • IR absorption bands of Methane • Concentration • Pressure • Temperature • Relative Humidity
June 2010 MC118 Cruise • 15 CTD CASTS with CDOM and Transmissometer • 5 Casts with the Contros • 3 with pump cowling • 1 with no pump cowling • 1 with pump operational • 3 with bottles & GC work • 4 separate Mass Spec casts
CTD Cast 13 With CDOM & O2
Detection Chamber Readings • Control Temperature • Gas Temperature • Pressure • Relative Humidity • Raw electrical signal
Depth Profile – Cast 13IR raw output Down Cast UP Cast
Depth ProfilesMass Spec Casts Cast 1 Cast 2 Cast 3
Future Directions • AUV Surveys • Mid-Atlantic Ridge • Geochemical Array - BBLA • Duty cycle vs reconfigure power draw • Post deployment follow up • Sensor development • Shorten response time • Lower detection levels
Funding for this project is generously provided by NOAA/OER, NIUSTDOI/BOEMRE (MMS)andDOE/NETL Special thanks to Andy Gossett, Matt Lowe, Brian Noakes, Larry Overstreet and the crew of the Pelican for handling the at-sea operations of the equipment