1 / 22

Case 1-2 NASDAQ Japan

Case 1-2 NASDAQ Japan. The Players. NASDAQ Softbank Corporation Osaka Stock Exchange (OSE) Three limited partners 10 strategic investors Indigo Markets. The Business Goal.

olwen
Download Presentation

Case 1-2 NASDAQ Japan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case 1-2NASDAQ Japan Nasdaq Japan

  2. The Players • NASDAQ • Softbank Corporation • Osaka Stock Exchange (OSE) • Three limited partners • 10 strategic investors • Indigo Markets Nasdaq Japan

  3. The Business Goal • Japanese stock market planned to become the link to allow 24-hour trading in combination with NASDAQs around the world • Global standards to be applied • Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Nasdaq Japan

  4. The Plan • To shift the financial assets of Japanese investors from safe low growth categories (80% is in cash, savings, insurance) to more high risk and high growth equity markets (currently only 5%). • An efficient, transparent global market would enable Japanese investors to move more of their personal wealth outside the country– much riskier Nasdaq Japan

  5. The Environment • Existing Japanese stock exchanges use an Auction securities model that does not perform efficiently enough to network with other country’s stock exchange systems. • A hybrid market model is proposed to ease the change Nasdaq Japan

  6. The Issues • What kind of market is this? • What role does culture play? • How should the business be structured? • Technology: build or buy? • Support systems: own, rent, outsource? • Can the US model work in Japan? Nasdaq Japan

  7. Basic Market Model Intermediation services arise as needed; fees arise from services Buyer Seller Buyer Seller Market Nasdaq Japan

  8. Auction Market Model Fees arise from auction services Can be completely automated Buyer Seller Market conducts auction Nasdaq Japan

  9. NASDAQ US Model Entrepre- neurship Listing Market- Making Clearing/ Settling Fin’l Mgmt Market Makers Issuers Investors NASDAQ Issuer Support Service Providers Investor Support Service Providers Settlement Agents Regu- lators Nasdaq Japan

  10. Hybrid Market Model Profit is made on difference between buy and sell prices; fees may also be earned for services Buyer Seller Market maker buys and sells as principal Nasdaq Japan

  11. A Bit of Chronology • June 1999-JV signed between NASDAQ and Softbank Corp • October 1999- NASDAQ Japan Club • April 2000-Agreement signed with OSE • June 19, 2000-Initial launch of NJI • June 19, 2001-Beta version of hybrid model running on NJ servers Nasdaq Japan

  12. A New Market Model • Improvements in Phase 2 over Phase 1 • Change of Market Model • Indigo market • Network • Implementation of ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) in addition to TCP/IP (Real time) Nasdaq Japan

  13. Technology Architecture Regulatory System Network Member Firm Trading Engine J-Net Disclosure Clearance Settlement Market Data Data Center Website Corporate Nasdaq Japan

  14. Technology Changes • Changes in Phase 2 from Phase 1 • Data center • Moved from Osaka to Tokyo • Managed by NJI (was managed by OSE) • Trading Engine & Regulatory Systems • Operated by NJI (was operated by OSE) • Networks • Managed by NJI (was managed by OSE) Nasdaq Japan

  15. Analysis-1 • NASDAQ and NJI tried create a market that would totally transform the Japanese way of thinking. • Because they wanted to do this quickly they worked with established Japanese Corporations • For example Softbank and OSE. • Most other corporations acted as limited partners or strategic investors. Nasdaq Japan

  16. Analysis-2 • The end result was an extremely complicated entity and this complexity could have contributed to their demise. • Another issue was the decline in the economy in both Japan and the U.S. that started in early 2001 • The company is running out of cash Nasdaq Japan

  17. Question 1 How did market structure and relationships change with the introduction of the NASDAQ Japan Market in June 2000? Nasdaq Japan

  18. Question 2 What impact will the launch of the NJM hybrid market model have on market structure and relationships in Japan? Nasdaq Japan

  19. Question 3 What are the strengths and weaknesses of the approach that has been taken to building a global securities market? Would you have done anything differently? Nasdaq Japan

  20. Question 4 What challenges do NASDAQ Japan executives face in the summer of 2001? What advice would you give? Nasdaq Japan

  21. Prescription • The goals of NJI were too aggressive for the conservative Japanese market; technology might not be so portable after all. • Plan to introduce the Phase II model gradually over a period of time instead of having to compromise with two tiered system • Raise awareness of technology. Nasdaq Japan

  22. Outcome • Announced end of joint venture August 16, 2002. • Alliance ended on October 15, 2002. • NASDAQ wrote off 20 million dollars. Lost money for two years and U.S. exchange did not predict that would change. • Softbank had to add 1.7 billion dollars to its growing list of failed investments Nasdaq Japan

More Related