200 likes | 303 Views
Cosmic ray density. Slides for the discussion. Cosmic ray density. Cosmic ray is useful for the alignment between plates. Decay search Momentum measurement not necessary for the location. Higher density Fake (cosmic ray) interaction. Bern example. Fake stop
E N D
Cosmic ray density Slides for the discussion
Cosmic ray density. • Cosmic ray is • useful for the alignment between plates. • Decay search • Momentum measurement • not necessary for the location. • Higher density • Fake (cosmic ray) interaction. • Bern example. • Fake stop • Multi candidates in CS->ECC connection. • Lower density • Momentum measurement accuracy?. • Maximum measurable momentum.
ECC with black CS(current Nagoya strategy.) • General scan the downstream plates(3~5). • search vertex candidates. • Scanback or Direct vertexing. • Strong worry about the 2nd, 3rd, vertex by cosmic ray. • --> no cosmic on the ECC with black CS. • Next talker, Takahashi. ECC downstream
Momentum measurement • Strongest interest on the muon from tau decay. • Most of them are below 5GeV. Or 10GeV. Momentum of mu from tau decay.
Momentum measurement by angular method • No need fine alignment Cell1/2
Momentum measurement by coordinate method Cell3/2 dx • Fine alignment is needed. Position resolution is sqrt(6)*(x)
dx (dx) = sqrt(3/2)*(x) Position resolution by current cosmic ray exposure. • SUTS data by 24h cosmic exposure 1cm^2 • 0.9 micron for X • 0.75 micron for Y • (momentum cut by angular method.)
dx (dx) = sqrt(3/2)*(x) 1cm x 1cm x 12plates 226 tracks in scanning area (nseg>=5 theta<0.5)
dx (dx) = sqrt(3/2)*(x) 1.4cm x 1.4cm x 11plates 369 tracks in scanning area • From the point of alignment. • Higher cosmic density doesn't give higher resolution. • 1/3~1/5 of current exposure is enough to get same alignment accuracy(1micron).
Bigger scanning area give a number of track. • It is competition between emulsion XY distortion and the scanning power.
Alignment for long range (cell length >=3,5) • The accumulation of the alignment error is of the order of Cell1/2(in worst case). For example, • cell length = 3, sqrt(6)*1micron = 2.4micron. • Cell length = 5, sqrt(10)*1micron=3.2micron. • On the other hand, the signal of the coordinate method is Cell3/2, which is enough big. Cell3/2
From the point of alignment. • Higher cosmic density doesn't give higher resolution. • 1/3~1/5 of current exposure is enough to get same alignment accuracy(1micron).
Ntrack = 281 starting from first 2plate && nseg>=3
Rms = sqrt(rms(theta1)^2 + rms(theta2)^2) rms(theta) = 1.2/sqrt(2) = 0.85mrad Angle resolution (including scattering.)
dx (dx) = sqrt(3/2)*(x) Including scattering. theta^rms cut = 5mrad for each cell.