1 / 12

Load and Resistance Factor Design “LRFD” for Shafts

Load and Resistance Factor Design “LRFD” for Shafts. Geotechnical Perspective Jim Cuthbertson. LRFD Shaft Design. First we have to review the basic principals upon which LRFD is based You Geotechs may recall the following:.  2 x 2 = 5. LRFD Shaft Design. First Step Field Exploration

oma
Download Presentation

Load and Resistance Factor Design “LRFD” for Shafts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Load and Resistance Factor Design“LRFD” for Shafts Geotechnical PerspectiveJim Cuthbertson

  2. LRFD Shaft Design • First we have to review the basic principals upon which LRFD is based • You Geotechs may recall the following:

  3.  2 x 2 = 5

  4. LRFD Shaft Design • First Step Field Exploration • WSDOT Policy • BR Curb to Curb width < 100 ft wide • one geotechnical boring per pier minimum • BR Curb to Curb width > 100 ft wide • Two geotechnical borings per pier minimum • Depth of investigation should extend below the anticipated shaft tip elevation a minimum of 20 feet, or a minimum of two times the maximum group dimension, whichever is deeper.

  5. LRFD Shaft Design Cohesive Soil • No Change from LFD to LRFD

  6. LRFD Shaft Design Non-Cohesive Soil • No Change from LFD to LRFD

  7. LRFD Shaft Design • So What Changed??  OLD LFD

  8. LRFD Shaft Design • So What Changed??  New LRFD

  9. LRFD Shaft Design

  10. LRFD Shaft Design

  11. LRFD Shaft Design • If resistance factors were safety factors where would we stand • 0.45  2.22 • 0.50  2.00 • 0.55  1.82 • This seems like we are designing our shafts with less “safety” than we were before with SF of 2.5 to 3. Remember there is a load side of the equation too, and those loads have been increased by Load Factors! Overall, right now we are just as safe as past practice

  12. QUESTIONS

More Related