230 likes | 315 Views
Apes in Lab Coats: Urging Precaution in the Church of Science. Dr. Bill Vitek Humanities and Social Sciences June 14, 2006. Overview. What’s going on in the Science Center? Knowledge and the academic-university tradition What science says about us and the world Science undoes itself!
E N D
Apes in Lab Coats:Urging Precaution in the Church of Science Dr. Bill Vitek Humanities and Social Sciences June 14, 2006
Overview • What’s going on in the Science Center? • Knowledge and the academic-university tradition • What science says about us and the world • Science undoes itself! • What went wrong, and keeps going wrong • Slowing down • Urging ignorance and precaution
The Church of Science • Dogma: Unquestioned Assumptions • Saints and Holy Books/Journals • Hierarchies • Disciplines/Disciples • Secret Languages and Rituals • Little Tolerance for Dissent, Heresies or Non-Scientists • Societal Power
Origins of the Modern University • 13th Century medieval charters • Christian origins • A union of all scholars • The pursuit of knowledge for the betterment of human life • The pursuit of knowledge as an expression of the human mind as rational, capable, and “god-like” (Greeks/Genesis)
Origins of the Modern University • Assumed the existence of God (First Cause), and a rational order to the universe • Developed methodologies for discovering this order with a mind that was similarly rationally ordered • Francis Bacon • Rene Descartes
Science Unleashed • Slow decoupling from religion • Increasing discrepancies with religious dogma: Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin • Increased power of scientific/mathematical tools • Merger of science and technology • The birth of modern engineering • Enormous power: technological, political, and personal
Science’s Assumptions • Mind-Reality Interface: Both are rational and designed/ordered • Knowledge is possible • Knowledge is power over the forces of nature • Divide and conquer: The dot of knowledge • Nature is passive • The whole is equal to the sum of its parts
Assumptions Continued • Scientific knowledge is value free • “Can implies ought” • All mistakes are fixable • “Cross that bridge when we come to it” • Knowledge accumulates and drives out ignorance • Science allows us to transgress limits • Science has no need or use for divinities
Assumptions Challenged • Nature is not passive • Whole not equal to the sum of the parts • Knowledge is not value free • Ignorance increases with increased knowledge • Some mistakes are less fixable than others • Greater Knowledge=Greater Responsibility
Science Undoes Itself • Heliocentrism • Evolutionary Biology • Ecosystem complexity • The power of the unconscious • The 2nd law of thermodynamics • Werner Heisenberg and Kurt Gödel
Science Undoes Itself • No necessary connection between human brain and the universe • No implied order without a creator • Apes in lab coats are still apes • There are limits that even humans cannot transgress • The Church of Science has a shaky foundation after all
And What a Mess it’s Making! • Overpopulation • Species Extinction • Global Warming • GMO’s • Nuclear Radiation • Chemical exposures: Cancer, Endocrine Disrupters • Your example here: ____________________
What to Do • Don’t Abandon Science • Don’t try to bring back its religious foundations • Admit the hard truths: • Evolution: Ignorance is our strong suit • 2nd Law: We can’t have it all • Ecosystem Complexity: We are not alone on the planet. Learn to share • Operate within an Ignorance-Based Worldview
The Precautionary Principle • History • Hippocrates (5th Century BCE): “Do No Harm” • Public Health • Germany in 1970’s: “Vorsorgenprinzip” or “Foresight Principle”
The Precautionary Principle Definition from 1992 Rio Conference "In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation." Ref: http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/rio-dec.html
The Precautionary Principle Principles • People have a duty to take anticipatory action to prevent harm. "If you have a reasonable suspicion that something bad might be going to happen, you have an obligation to try to stop it.” • The burden of proof of harmlessness of a new technology, process, activity, or chemical lies with the proponents, not with the general public. Source: http://www.sdearthtimes.com/et0398/et0398s4.html
The Precautionary Principle Principles • Before using a new technology, process, or chemical, or starting a new activity, people have an obligation to examine "a full range of alternatives" including the alternative of doing nothing. • Decisions applying the precautionary principle must be "open, informed, and democratic" and "must include affected parties." Source: http://www.sdearthtimes.com/et0398/et0398s4.html
The Precautionary Principle • In action • EPA and OSHA in 1970’s • Canada: Federal Policy (2003) • Quebec Pesticide Laws (2002) • American Public Health Association endorsement (2000)
The Precautionary Principle • In action • Massachusetts Toxic Use Reduction legislation • Swedish ban of PBDEs (polybrominated diphenylethers), a fire retardant • The EU REACH Program (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization for Chemicals)
Ignorance-Based World View in Action • Citizen Science • Curriculum on Medical Ignorance • EU ban on GM foods
An Ignorance Based Worldview • Ignorance is our long suit • Go slow • Study the exits • Listen to all the voices • Work collaboratively • Be held accountable for your mistakes • Give non-scientists a say in their lives
“Nature is an infinite sphere of which the center is everywhere and the circumference nowhere.” Blaise Pascal “I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there.” Richard Feynman “The difference between what the most and the least learned people know is inexpressibly trivial in relation to that which is unknown.” Albert Einstein
“Since humans are billions of times more ignorant than they are knowledgeable, why not go with our long suit and develop an ignorance based world view?” Wes Jasckon, Ph.D and Director The Land Institute Salina, Kansas