80 likes | 402 Views
Sex Differences In Approaching Friends With Benefits Relationships. Joey Demeter, Frank Higuera & Markella Thompson. Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research , 48:2-3, 275-284.
E N D
Sex Differences In Approaching Friends With Benefits Relationships Joey Demeter, Frank Higuera & Markella Thompson Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.
Friends With Benefits (FWB) Relationships • Friends sexually but not romantically involved • Relationship determined romantic or not by partners involved • Study measured: • Number of FWB relationships • Motives for initiating FWB relationships • Commitment to different aspects of FWB relationship (sexual and friendship) • Future Hopes for FWB relationship • Sex differences of the above Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.
Hypotheses • Men will have more concurrent and lifetime FWB partners than women. • Men will cite sexual desire more than women as a FWB motive whereas women will cite emotional connection more than men. • Men will be more committed to maintaining the sexual aspect of FWB relationship while women will be more committed to the friendship aspect. • Women will be more likely to desire a future change in their FWB relationships than men. Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.
Method • Conducted an internet survey about FWB relationships. • 411 particiapants (307 women and 104 men) • Age- Mean = 26.95 (range 18-65) Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.
Results • 1 FWB = 76% • 2 FWB = 16% • 3 or more FWB = 8% • Men had more multiple concurrent FWB and more lifetime FWB than women. • Men cited sex as motive for FWB initiation more than women. Women cited emotional connection more often than men. • No significant sex difference in terms of degree of commitment to either sexual or friendship aspect of FWB relationship. • Women more likely hoped FWB relationship would change than men. Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.
Critical Review • No sex difference found for commitment to friendship or sexual aspect of relationship. • Social explanation for results (double standard pertaining to sex). Did not mention possible evolutionary reasons. • Romantic relationship not standardized in study. Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.
Discussion • What is the difference between a romantic relationship and a FWB relationship? • Which aspect comes first (sexual or friendship) more often? What would be the differences between the two scenarios? • How does society view these relationships? Will, and if so how, will this view change in the future? Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E. & Kelly, J. R. (2010). Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48:2-3, 275-284.