1 / 64

Beams and Frames

Beams and Frames. beam theory can be used to solve simple beams complex beams with many cross section changes are solvable but lengthy many 2-d and 3-d frame structures are better modeled by beam theory. One Dimensional Problems.

omer
Download Presentation

Beams and Frames

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beams and Frames

  2. beam theory can be used to solve simple beams • complex beams with many cross section changes are solvable but lengthy • many 2-d and 3-d frame structures are better modeled by beam theory

  3. One Dimensional Problems The geometry of the problem is three dimensional, but the variation of variable is one dimensional Variable can be scalar field like temperature, or vector field like displacement. For dynamic loading, the variable can be time dependent

  4. Element Formulation • assume the displacement w is a cubic polynomial in a1, a2, a3, a4 are the undetermined coefficients • L = Length • I = Moment of Inertia of the cross sectional area • E = Modulus of Elsaticity • v = v(x) deflection of the neutral axis • = dv/dx slope of the elastic curve (rotation of the section F = F(x) = shear force M= M(x) = Bending moment about Z-axis

  5. `

  6. Applying these boundary conditions, we get • Substituting coefficients ai back into the original equation for v(x) and rearranging terms gives

  7. The interpolation function or shape function is given by

  8. strain for a beam in bending is defined by the curvature, so • Hence

  9. the stiffness matrix [k] is defined To compute equivalent nodal force vector for the loading shown

  10. Equivalent nodal force due to Uniformly distributed load w

  11. v2 v1 v3 q1 q3 q2 v3 v4

  12. Member end forces 70 70 70 139.6 46.53 46.53 0 139.6

  13. v1 q1 v2 q2 v2 q2 v3 q3 v1 v2 v3 q1 q3 q2

  14. 1285.92 1285.92 428.64 857.28 5143.2 6856.8 856.96 0

  15. Find slope at joint 2 and deflection at joint 3. Also find member end forces Global coordinates Fixed end reactions (FERs) Action/loads at global coordinates

  16. Grid Elements qxj’ fj qxi’ fi

  17. Beam element for 3D analysis

  18. if axial load is tensile, results from beam elements are higher than actual Þ results are conservative • if axial load is compressive, results are less than actual • size of error is small until load is about 25% of Euler buckling load

  19. for 2-d, can use rotation matrices to get stiffness matrix for beams in any orientation • to develop 3-d beam elements, must also add capability for torsional loads about the axis of the element, and flexural loading in x-z plane

  20. to derive the 3-d beam element, set up the beam with the x axis along its length, and y and z axes as lateral directions • torsion behavior is added by superposition of simple strength of materials solution

  21. J = torsional moment about x axis • G = shear modulus • L = length • fxi, fxjare nodal degrees of freedom of angle of twist at each end • Ti, Tj are torques about the x axis at each end

  22. flexure in x-z plane adds another stiffness matrix like the first one derived • superposition of all these matrices gives a 12 ´ 12 stiffness matrix • to orient a beam element in 3-d, use 3-d rotation matrices

  23. for beams long compared to their cross section, displacement is almost all due to flexure of beam • for short beams there is an additional lateral displacement due to transverse shear • some FE programs take this into account, but you then need to input a shear deformation constant (value associated with geometry of cross section)

  24. limitations: • same assumptions as in conventional beam and torsion theories • no better than beam analysis • axial load capability allows frame analysis, but formulation does not couple axial and lateral loading which are coupled nonlinearly

  25. analysis does not account for • stress concentration at cross section changes • where point loads are applied • where the beam frame components are connected

  26. Finite Element Model • Element formulation exact for beam spans with no intermediate loads • need only 1 element to model any such member that has constant cross section • for distributed load, subdivide into several elements • need a node everywhere a point load is applied

  27. need nodes where frame members connect, where they change direction, or where the cross section properties change • for each member at a common node, all have the same linear and rotational displacement • boundary conditions can be restraints on linear displacements or rotation

  28. simple supports restrain only linear displacements • built in supports restrain rotation also

More Related