260 likes | 673 Views
Bureaucracy and Preventing Terrorism. Currently, a variety of Senate and House committees are responsible for different aspects of security in the U.S.Two views concerning expanded homeland security bureaucracyConsolidating power is efficientLarge bureaucracy with a clear mission will empower the security forces to perform their missionDecentralizing power personalizes services and helps develop links to communitiesInformal offices are more adept at recognizing and handling problems.
E N D
1. Law Enforcement Bureaucracy and Homeland Security Chapter 16
Prepared by: Babette Protz
3. Bureaucracy and Preventing Terrorism Large organizations are difficult to manage
Weber argues that bureaucracy should be designed to accomplish specific purposes
Labor should be divided into specific functions
All functions of the organization are to assemble logically to produce the whole
4. Intelligence and Bureaucracy Homeland security calls for new alliances among federal agencies and cooperative relations among local, state, and federal levels of government
Administrator at DHS, DOJ, the FBI, and the office of the Director of National Intelligence have recognized the importance of state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies
5. State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Bureaucracies Consensus needed among different police agencies
Needs of homeland security and individuals communities must be addressed to provide overall security
One method that will accomplish this goal is task orientation
Task orientation focuses the actions of individuals departments
6. State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Bureaucracies Facing the many different organizations that compose state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies is the problem of transforming bureaucracy
Cooperative efforts of community policing and the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP) show how local law enforcement agencies can participate with the multitude of federal agencies
Carter – homeland security extends what state, local, and tribal agencies are already doing
7. Border Patrol Borders of the U.S. are vulnerable in several areas
Long stretches of unprotected areas along the northern and southern borders are wide open for infiltration
Over 300 seaports must be secured
Air travel and entry points require security
Accounting for noncitizens within U.S. borders
8. Border Patrol A survey of 500 border patrol agents and 500 immigration inspectors from the Border Protection and U.S. customs divisions revealed that only 16% were satisfied with the efforts of DHS
Majority of respondents complained of low morale
Line level personnel
9. Policy Disputes The 9-11 Commission Report addressed border security recommending reforms
More than 500M people cross U.S. borders every year, 330M are foreigners
Reform is essential
The system is unable to provide security or monitor foreigners in the U.S.
Some policies of DHS have not been popular with other countries
Fingerprinting and photographing
10. Immigration Debate Buchanan – unregulated flow of immigrants from the southern border opens the door to terrorist infiltration
Allowing unregulated influx of Hispanics from the south, U.S. risks not only terrorism, but destruction of American culture
Critics dismissed Buchanan as right wing
Same argument presented by scholars such as Samuel Huntington
11. Immigration Debate Diminyatz – failure to protect the southern border represents four major national security threats
Terrorism and weapons of mass destruction
Drug trafficking
Human smuggling
Infectious disease
Most significant threat comes from terrorism and organized crime
To correct the situation U.S. military forces should be deployed along the border until civilian law enforcement can be consolidated and effective barriers can be established
12. Immigration Debate Others are of the opinion that immigration does not affect homeland security
Sebastian Mallaby
Some law enforcement officials may not welcome the idea of joining a federal partnership to secure borders
Securing information from legal and illegal immigrants
Maintaining relationships with the illegal community
13. Immigration Debate Debate on immigration is problematic
The very nature of the problem is under dispute
Some claim it is not a problem, others claim it is a big problem
There is confusion about the relationship between local law enforcement and federal agencies
Further complicated by the number of federal agencies with a role in security and immigration
Current laws meant to monitor immigrants are not followed
14. Infrastructure Protection Clarke – there are a number of threats facing the nation’s infrastructure
Most computer systems are vulnerable to viruses
Nation’s power system and technological organizations that support it are vulnerable to disruptions
Internet and computer networks that support these systems are also vulnerable to attack
Shut down electrical grids and computers – shut down transportation and communication
15. Infrastructure Protection Clarke – FBI should not have been lead agency for infrastructure protection
Can also be argued that state and local law enforcement should not play the leading role in infrastructure protection
Role more appropriately suited to technological specialists
Private industries (i.e., General Motors, Wal-Mart) have excellent information gathering and security systems
Private industries often share information with the government for the public good
One-way flow of information
16. Infrastructure Protection All levels of law enforcement are faced with the problems of technical specialists and access to privately owned portions of the infrastructure
Links with the public and private organizations are necessary
Linkages should be developed in two crucial areas
Police should be linked to the security forces already associated with infrastructure functions
State and local law enforcement agencies must establish formal and informal networks with the organizations in their jurisdictions
17. Infrastructure Protection Police agencies should be involved in protecting their own information infrastructures
Most police agencies integrate electronic management systems into their routines
If these systems are disrupted, law enforcement agencies would be unable to defend the community or their support systems
18. Thinking Internationally Terrorism is an abstract concept fluctuating according to political circumstances
Security forces require people with critical thinking skills
Abstract reasoning skills
Knowledge of international politics and history
Specialized expertise in particular regions
Law enforcement agencies in the U.S. generally do not have skilled specialists
Presents problems as DHS tries to create information networks
19. Rivalries Federal agencies, at times, act more like rivals than partners
9-11 Commission noted this in its report
Federal agencies failure to cooperate with each other can influence local police relationships
Many police executives in the U.S. are not convinced that the FBI is in partnership with efforts to stop terrorism
If law enforcement in the U.S. is to become part of homeland defense, the relationship between FBI and local law enforcement must improve
20. Local Control and Revenue Sources Civil libertarians believe consolidated police power will erode civil rights
Local government officials worry their agendas will be lost in the federal maze
Costs of homeland security responsibilities adds a level of frustration to local governments
Some jurisdictions want homeland security money distributed evenly
Larger jurisdictions argue that money should be distributed according to likelihood of attack
Others are concerned that homeland security grants are given to local governments for bizarre reasons
$36,000 to the state of Kentucky to keep terrorists from infiltrating bingo halls
21. Border Security: Critique and Reform Bureaucracies in the U.S. are squandering the opportunity to defend the itself
Flynn – U.S. has made two crucial mistakes
Homeland security separated from national security
Infrastructure is vulnerable to attack
U.S. has not organized its resources for defense
Prepared to fight overseas while neglecting to protect the home front
22. Border Security: Critique and Reform Flynn – According to the CIA, weapons of mass destruction would most likely be smuggled into the U.S. by sea
Difficult to inspect all of the cargo containers in seaports
Oceans represent an opportunity for terrorists
Bush administration has done very little to protect the nation’s seaports
U.S., in 2004, spent more money every three days to fight the war in Iraq than it has in three years of protecting seaports
23. Border Security: Critique and Reform Nation’s critical infrastructure remains open to attack
Department of Defense, in 2005, was allotted $7.6 billion to enhance the fortifications of its bases
In the same budget the infrastructure for the entire nation received $2.6 billion
Dirty bombs and chemical threats can be developed from hazardous material
Over the past three years funds to secure the disposal of such material have been drastically reduced
24. Border Security: Critique and Reform While enhanced border security is necessary, this alone will not protect the U.S. against a terrorist attack
Jihadists are fully aware of vulnerabilities in the infrastructure
Safest and most effect way to hit the U.S. is to hit the infrastructure
Jihadists understand the economic effect of their actions
25. Border Security: Critique and Reform Flynn – Development of an integrated system against terrorism would reduce the drug trade, contraband smuggling, and theft
Law enforcement agencies should look for weaknesses in the system, probe them, and make changes based on the results
Not every attack can be prevented; however, most terrorism can be deterred through cooperative partnership
26. JTTF System The JTTF system may serve as an example for the first step in law enforcement cooperation
Creation of a system that separates criminal and national security intelligence
Regional units designed to combat terrorism combine
Local police officers
State police officers
Various federal police officers
Prosecutors
Correctional officers
Local and state officers are given federal authority; these officers’ presence give federal agents the ability to act in local jurisdictions
Local police are in a perfect position to engage in intelligence gathering activities
France
Germany
Canadians and British