290 likes | 503 Views
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION. Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice. USD 1.5 to 5 billion. USD 1 to 2.8 billion. USD 3 to 14 billion. USD 4.5 to 45 billion. USD 4 to 8 billion. USD 23 million to 1 billion. USD 100 million. USD 250 million or more.
E N D
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice
USD 1.5 to 5 billion USD 1 to 2.8 billion USD 3 to 14 billion USD 4.5 to 45 billion USD 4 to 8 billion USD 23 million to 1 billion USD 100 million USD 250 million or more USD 106 to 700 million
OVERVIEW • Informal versus Formal Assistance • Multilateral Treaties Generally • U.N. Convention against Corruption • Assistance from the United States
PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS Formal Requests Informal Requests • Information and Investigation • Not evidence • Non-compulsory measures • Use in Court may be prohibited • May need authentication • Evidence • Compulsory Action • Certification of Authenticity • Rule of Specialty • Covered Illicit Conduct
WHAT TO ASK FOR Formal Requests Informal Requests • Interview Witnesses • Visual Surveillance • Public Record Search • Suspicious Activity Report Information • Open investigation • Unofficial public documents • Formal Service • Sworn Testimony • Financial Records • Certified Documents • Nonconsensual Search • Restraint • Enforce Judgment • Lift restraint • Confidentiality
INFORMAL MECHANISMS • International law enforcement contacts • Law Enforcement Attaches • Embassy personnel • Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) • Investigative Lead Information • Follow informal with formal…
MYTH OR TRUTH? NO TREATY NO HELP
FORMAL MECHANISMS • Multilateral agreements • Bilateral Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties • Letters Rogatory • Extradition Treaties Often Depends on Foreign law
MULITLATERAL TREATIES • United Nations Conventions • 1988 Drugs (Vienna) • 1999 Terrorist Financing • 2000 Organized Crime (Palermo) • 2002 Corruption (Merida) • Inter-American Conventions • 1992 Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters • 1996 Corruption • Terrorism
OLD FORFEITURE LEGAL ASSISTANCE REGIME • Requested country either • open own case OR • enforce a foreign confiscation judgment • 1988 Vienna Convention • 2000 Palermo Convention
NEW FORFEITURE LEGAL ASSISTANCE REGIME • Direct recovery without forfeiture (Art. 53) • MUST have basis to provide assistance (Art. 54) • Procedures for international cooperation (Art. 55)
DIRECT RECOVERY - ARTICLE 53 • Courts must be open for civil action • Victim Country files civil suit to establish title • Restitution • Victim Country can be recognized for award of damages or compensation • Claimant in forfeiture proceedings • Victim country can be recognized as a legitimate owner before final forfeiture
FRAMEWORK FOR FORFEITURE COOPERATION - ARTICLE 54 • Provisional measures • Be able to enforce a foreign restraint order • Freeze on evidence that a forfeiture order forthcoming • Consider other options: arrest, charge • If open own case domestic restraint (Art. 31)
FRAMEWORK FOR FORFEITURE COOPERATION - ARTICLE 54 • Confiscation/Forfeiture • Must be able to enforce a foreign order • Must be able to open own case • Consider non-conviction based forfeiture
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIONIN CONFISCATION - ARTICLE 55 • On receipt of request, either: • Enforce foreign judgment OR • Open own case • Guidelines for what to include in request • Deny request or lift provisional measures if: • Sufficient evidence not provided • De minimis value • BUT provide opportunity to cure problem
DUAL CRIMINALITYARTICLE 46 (9) • Traditional exception to legal assistance • Coercive measures, dual criminality still applies • Non-coercive measure, provide assistance • Unless de minimis, conflict with national law
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATY ASSISTANCE • Identify Authority making the request • Object and Nature of Investigation or proceeding (including offenses) • SUMMARY of Pertinent Facts • Precise Description of Assistance Requested • Identity, location, nationality, of people involved • Purpose of request
FORFEITURE REQUESTS • Description of property, including location and value (where possible) • Admissible Copy of Orders on Which Request Based • Statement of Notice provided if Enforcement of Judgment sought • Statement that Forfeiture order is final and extent that enforcement is sought
FORFEITURE ASSISTANCE • May be refused or provisional measures lifted if • Evidence not provided • property of de minimis value • Opportunity to cure defect before provisional measures lifted
ASSISTANCE FROM THE U.S. • U.S. initiates its own forfeiture action • Criminal Forfeiture • In Rem Forfeiture • Enforce Foreign Forfeiture Judgments • Provisional Restraint Mechanisms
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS 28 U.S.C. § 2467 • Foreign Offense that would be Forfeitable Federal Violation if Committed in the U.S. • Treaty or Agreement • Attorney General Certification • Criminal and in rem Judgments
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS • Enforce Judgment Unless • System Incompatible with Due Process • No personal jurisdiction • No subject matter jurisdiction • Insufficient notice to Defendant • Judgment obtained by fraud • Court Bound by Factual Findings in Foreign Judgment
PROVISIONAL MEASURES • Mechanism will Depend on Circumstances • Foreign Arrest or Charge can be basis for immediate 30-day freeze • Provide copy of charging document • Must provide additional evidence • Enforce foreign restraining order • Include specifics in order • Based upon affidavit
MYTH OR TRUTH? FEW COUNTRIES HELP
BEFORE MAKING A REQUEST • Coordinate timing with criminal investigation • Leave time for other country to act • Contact foreign attaches at local embassies, Central Authority of other country • Anticipate possibility of disclosure
Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division (AFMLS) Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel. (202) 514-6340 Fax (202) 514-5522 Daniel.Claman@usdoj.gov