1 / 18

Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi-Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking

Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi-Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking. Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant Professor, University of California Berkeley Stephen A. Mahin, Co-PI Clay J. Naito, Post-doc. Erik Kunkel, Grad. student Suzanne Robinson, Grad. student

oneida
Download Presentation

Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi-Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi-Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. MosalamAssistant Professor, University of California Berkeley Stephen A. Mahin, Co-PI Clay J. Naito, Post-doc. Erik Kunkel, Grad. student Suzanne Robinson, Grad. student Patrik Meyer, Undergrad. student Meeting at UC-San Diego

  2. Building Design • Apartment building with tuckunder parking (open front in the ground story) and flat roof • Three-story structure • Upper two stories have 2 units with doors and windows on back wall and windows on front wall • 1960’s structure designed according to UBC-64 • Model dimensions: 32’ x 16’ x 27’

  3. Rehabilitation • Reduce the risk of ground story collapse • Design according to UBC-97 • Vertical elements at open front: steel moment frames • Enhancement of ground story back wall with holdowns at openings

  4. System Testing • Quasi-static: • 1) First story with open front (initial stiffness) • 2) First story with retrofitted front • Dynamic: • 1) First story with closed front (vibration) • 2) First two stories with closed front (vibration) • 3) First two stories with open front (vibration) • 4) Three story with steel moment frame at front • 5) Three story with open front • 6) Three story with open front and finish materials • 7) Finished three story with steel moment frame at front

  5. Component Testing • Two types of connections: • 1) Vertical elements to header (SMF, OMF, shear wall) • 2) Diaphragm to header (four conditions) 2x12 6x12 a) Existing b) Minimal d) Conservative c) Moderate a) 2-10d TN (each side) b) Same as a) + A35 (every other block) c) Same as b) + 2-LS70 top d) same as b) + 8d @ 4’’

  6. Diaphragm to Header Setup

  7. Diaphragm to Header Specimens

  8. Preliminary Results

More Related