1 / 18

EFC Interoperability – Requirements and Status

EFC Interoperability – Requirements and Status. J.W. Tierolf RWS – AVV 12 June 2007. Overview. EC legislation General Eurovignet Directive Interoperability Directive CESARE 3 Model TC - TSP relation Interoperability – status & timetable Standardisation

opa
Download Presentation

EFC Interoperability – Requirements and Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EFC Interoperability –Requirements and Status J.W. Tierolf RWS – AVV 12 June 2007 Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  2. Overview • EC legislation • General • Eurovignet Directive • Interoperability Directive • CESARE 3 Model • TC - TSP relation • Interoperability – status & timetable • Standardisation • Enforcement - generic & autonomous systems • EC Requirements Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  3. EC Legislation - General • Types of Law/Regulation • Treaty • Directive • Decision • Non-discrimination • Foreigners may not be charged more or have more difficult conditions • No Borders • Not allowed to stop travelers/trucks/cars at internal EU borders • Privacy Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  4. Eurovignet Directive • Trucks and Coaches • On TERN, but other Roads allowed • Tariffs • Based on infra costs • Limited 15 –25 % extra for objects (e.g. tunnels) • No external costs allowed, but differentation is ok (e.g. euroclass) • (2008 start discussion on environmental costs) • (minimum level for Vehicle Use Tax) Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  5. Interoperability Directive 2004/52 • Directive adopted April 2004 • Per 2007 3 technologies allowed: • Satellite (GPS/Galileo) (location) • DSRC 5,8GHz microwave (beacons) • GSM/GPRS (communication) • EETS is parallel service • Offered by MS/TC at request of users • One User contract + One EETS OBU • Implementation after EETS definition decision: • 3 years for trucks and coaches • 5 years for cars Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  6. Cesare 3 • ASECAP (concessionnaires) and Stockholm Group analysed organisational contractual and procedural issues and developed EETS role model • Stockholm Group is authorities platform for EFC and Interoperability • Members are ministries of transport, taxoffices or national Road Authorities of: • AT, CH, DE, FI, NL, PL, SE, Slov, UK Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  7. Interoperability Manager EETS Provider Toll Charger Service User Roll Model EETS Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  8. Roll Model EETS Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  9. TC – TSP Relations • TC needs from/about TSP • Guarantees: • financial status; payment of valid toll declarations • Mechanism that 100% of passages are declared + truthful toll declarations (Is thin OBU + proxy possible?) • National TSP may be controllable and trusted • European EETS TSP maybe no trusted party • (banks consider each other non-trusted parties) • This could place extra or higher demands on arrangements • e.g. non-public keys • Interoperability Management Rules (not mandatory?) Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  10. Elements for Interoperability • Definition Decision • Standards • for DSRC Systems • Communication, Charging, Enforcement • for Autonomous Systems • Charging, Updating, Enforcement • Enforcement based on DSRC; should be ‘non-trusted’ • Application Guide for: • EETS Procedures, Interoperability Management • Certification of OBUs? Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  11. Interoperability status • EC rewriting decision • Draft Mid June ‘07 • Just 1 decision • Minimum approach • Technical details in standards • Procedures in application guide (Cesare IV?) • Leave more to the Market • Including EMB (no public law status) Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  12. Interoperability Timetable • Draft decision – June 2007 • Comité Télépéage – 26 June • For two-way information only • Member States only (plus EEA?) - (no voting) • Decision – end ’07 (EC); mid ’08 (real?) • Start for 3 & 5 years time to implementation • DSRC standards – about ready • GNSS draft standard – mid ’08? • EC grant under ‘new approach’ • Enforcement Module separate? Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  13. Standardisation • GNSS standard to include ?: • Updating protocol • Enforcement protocol • For roadside checking, including secure part for unalterable track records • Allowing both ‘thin’ or ‘fat’ operation • Further DSRC standard almost there • Standard for TPS – TC Interface needed? Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  14. International Enforcement • Enforcement is national/local responsibility in the 1st place • Therefore checks are best done and enforced, while vehicle is in toll domain and under national jurisdiction • Internationally, non-100%, statistical approaches most likely • Internationally, only follow-up of confirmed penalties may be possible • VERA 3 data exchange network • ‘Vera 3’ directive ? Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  15. Autonomous Systems’ Enforcement • TC needs way to check if vehicles send valid declarations or are paying • If vehicles are equipped • From which EETS provider they are • Ranging from full control to random checks • TC needs way to check if declarations are truthful • Unalterable secure track records • Efficient methods for Checking needed • For high volumes, video or (better) electronic ways (DSRC) with secure smart card or simcard • Unalterable, with signature, hash code Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  16. Autonomous Systems’ Enforc. -2 • Vehicles, not sending valid toll declarations may not be fraudulent • E.g. malfunctioning equipment • To provide alternative • TC may want control mechanisms to check TSP too • EETS accreditation first, then good contract • TSP to guarantee valid declarations; keep track records; etc. • E.g. audits • TC roadside checks Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  17. EC requirements • No Borders • EC allows no border checks/controls (5 kms inland ok?) • OBUs not mandatory for foreigners • Unless cheap (5€?) and easy to install (<10 min ?) • EETS OBU & Contract to be accepted by all TCs • Non-discrimination • Also for foreign TSPs • HGV, Tax, Interoper. directives + EU Market Rules • Only 3 technologies allowed • But parallel other system for national vehicles allowed? (could be cheaper) Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

  18. Conclusions • EC regulations pose additional requirements • Standards required too (CEN; DSRC, GPS incl. enforcement) • Interoperability Management also required (Cesare 4 application guide? + establishment IM) • Certification: market process? • 2008 decision, rest should be clear and most ready within a year. • Issues • TC-TSP relation (guarantees, balance for business) • Enforcement of autonomous systems • Interoperability Management Warsaw RUC Seminar - 12 June 2007 - JW Tierolf

More Related