1 / 1

Cross Affiliated People : Joan B. Kelly Elizabeth Hickey Jim Cook David Dinn Phil Stahl

Key players in control of the HHS grant process who use this influence to gain favorable case results for CRC members and gov’t paid fees for AFCC professionals. Center for Policy Research (“CPR”) Jessica Pearson, Director Evaluates AND designs key program. AFCC

opal
Download Presentation

Cross Affiliated People : Joan B. Kelly Elizabeth Hickey Jim Cook David Dinn Phil Stahl

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Key players in control of the HHS grant process who use this influence to gain favorable case results for CRC members and gov’t paid fees for AFCC professionals. Center for Policy Research (“CPR”) Jessica Pearson, Director Evaluates AND designs key program AFCC judges who hear the cases & the court professionals appearing before them Jessica Pearson-Incorporating Officer Affiliated Policy Studies Inc. PSI (CPPS) David Williams David Price Final Evaluations 2,4 Cross Affiliated People: Joan B. Kelly Elizabeth Hickey Jim Cook David Dinn Phil Stahl Federal HHS-OCSE FatherhoodPrograms: use to pay court professionals in cases 1) Access/Visitation Enforcement (Mandated) 2) Responsible Fatherhood (Discretionary) Funded with OCSE discretionary program funds; and OCSE “Incentive” funds; and from surplus state TANF funds Key Problems 1 - people 2 - program 3 - money 4- conflicts Co-Founder: Meyer Elkin $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 $ $ $ 2,3,4 1, 3, 4 $ $ $ Model Custody Program when D.V. is a factor $ $ $ 2,3,4 2,3,4 2, 3, 4 Children Rights Council (CRC) Owner Operated privatized child support sites 1, 3, 4 2 , 4 Early Implementation Reviews & Exec Summaries Paid from program funds: Pro-Pedophile Custody Experts Psychologist, Evaluators Judicial Trainers, Mediators, Supervisors 1, 3, 4 2, 3, 4 Pedophiles Gardner & Underwager & Farrell 1, 4 Program Design & Implementation designed to intervene in court cases Principle Violations: 1) Judges obtaining the grants & hearing cases are in some instances affiliated with the male litigants (programs serve as a vehicle for favorable case results for enrolled dads - many are CRC members). 2) Federal evaluators concealed: (a) their role in program design; (b) their “ownership” role in model program site; (c) cross-affiliation with program case managers; (d) affiliated with court professionals being paid from program as court evaluators; (e) designed program so child support agencies recruit the adversary of their Congressional mandated public client for sole purpose of litigating against that custodial client; (f) gave case managers ‘judicial’ like authority to change support orders; (g) use of Gardner/PAS tactics which they have discredited themselves. 2 , 4 Colorado POP Program • Designed by CPR& PSI • Implemented thru “Maximus” - PSI Owner Operated Site • Fathers Rights (CRC) made program case managers and given ‘judicial‘ authority to change court orders • DeadBeat dads given “free” program -paid attys. to litigant on custody & visitation against the mother Child Access Project A/V Demo Project Dick Woods, IA CRC • Managed IA project- Gardner tactis used in cases to switch custody fathers accused of child abuse

More Related