1 / 13

RSA Encryption and Primality Testing

Learn about RSA encryption, primality testing, and factoring techniques such as Miller-Rabin and Quadratic Sieve. Discover how to factor large numbers and find prime numbers using these methods.

opperman
Download Presentation

RSA Encryption and Primality Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DTTF/NB479: Dszquphsbqiz Day 22 • Announcements: • Pass in worksheet on using RSA now. • DES graded soon • Short “pop” quiz on Ch 3 (Thursday at earliest) • Term project groups and topics due by Friday • Can use discussion forum to find teammates • HW6 posted, due date bumped back to next week (and a few questions added), but doing what’s there now might help your quiz prep. • Questions? • This week: • Primality testing, factoring • Discrete Logs

  2. Miller-Rabin So: k Given odd n>1, write n-1=2km, where k >=1. Choose a base a randomly (or just pick a=2) Let b0=am(mod n) If b0=+/-1, stop. n is probably prime by Fermat For i = 1..k-1 Compute bi=bi-12. If bi=1(mod n), stop. n is composite by SRCT, and gcd(bi-1-1,n) is a factor. If bi=-1(mod n), stop. n is probably prime by Fermat. If bk=1 (mod n), stop. n is composite by SRCT Else n is composite by Fermat. b0 b1 bk Big picture: Fermat on steroids By doing a little extra work (finding k to change the order of the powermod), we can call some pseudoprimes composite and find some of their factors

  3. Using within a primality testing scheme n (From Day 11) Odd? no div by other small primes? no Fermat? yes Prime by Factoring/advanced techn.? yes prime

  4. Using within a primality testing scheme n • Finding large probable primes • #primes < x = Density of primes: ~1/ln(x) For 100-digit numbers, ~1/230. So ~1/115 of odd 100-digit numbers are prime Can start with a random large odd number and iterate, applying M-R to remove composites. We’ll soon find one that is a likely prime. Maple’s nextprime() appears to do this, but also runs the Lucas test: http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath473.htm Alternatively, could repeat M-R to get high probability prime Odd? no div by other small primes? no Pass M-R? yes Prime by Factoring/advanced techn.? yes prime

  5. Factoring • If you are trying to factor n=pq and know that p~q, use Fermat factoring: • Compute n + 12, n + 22, n + 32, until you reach a perfect square, say r2 = n + k2 • Then n = r2 - k2 = (r+k)(r-k) • The moral of the story? • Choose p and q such that _____

  6. Example Factor n = 3837523 • Concepts we will learn also apply to factoring really big numbers. They are the basis of the best current methods • All you have to do to win $30,000 is factor a 212 digit number. • This is the RSA Challenge: http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2093#RSA704

  7. Quadratic Sieve (1) Factor n = 3837523 Want x,y:  gcd(x-y, n) is a factor Step 1: Pick a factor base, just a set of small factors. • In our examples, we’ll use those < 20. • There are 8: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19

  8. Quadratic Sieve (2a) Factor n = 3837523 Want x,y:  gcd(x-y, n) is a factor Step 2: We want squares that are congruent to products of factors in the factor base. Our hope: Reasonably small numbers are more likely to be products of factors in the factor base. • Then which is small as long as k isn’t too big • Loop over small e, lots of k. • A newer technique, the number field sieve, is somewhat faster

  9. Quadratic Sieve (2b) Factor n = 3837523 Want x,y:  gcd(x-y, n) is a factor Step 2: We want squares that are congruent to products of factors in the factor base. Our hope: Reasonably small numbers are more likely to be products of factors in the factor base. Examples:

  10. Quadratic Sieve (3) Factor n = 3837523 Want x,y:  gcd(x-y, n) is a factor Step 3: Want two non-congruent perfect squares Example: This is close, but all factors need to be paired Recall:

  11. Quadratic Sieve (3b) Factor n = 3837523 Want x,y:  gcd(x-y, n) is a factor Step 3: Want two non-congruent perfect squares Example: This is close, but all factors need to be paired Generate lots of # and experiment until all factors are paired. So what? gcd(1147907-17745, n)=1093 Other factor = n/1093=3511

  12. Quadratic Sieve (3b) Factor n = 3837523 Want x,y:  gcd(x-y, n) is a factor Step 4: Want to get 2 non-congruent perfect squares Example: This is close, but all factors need to be paired Generate lots of # and experiment until all factors are paired. To automate this search: Can write each example are a row in a matrix, where each column is a prime in number base Then search for dependencies among rows mod 2. May need extra rows, since sometimes we get x=+/-y.

  13. My code Factor n = 3837523 To automate this search: • Each row in the matrix is a square • Each column is a prime in the number base • Search for dependencies among rows mod 2. • For last one (green) So we can’t use the square root compositeness theorem Sum: 0 2 2 2 0 4 0 0 Sum: 8 4 6 0 2 4 0 2 Sum: 6 0 6 0 0 2 0 2

More Related