1 / 36

Presented by:

The Planning Process 9th grade Regional Planning Course from the Delaware Recommended Curriculum for Social Studies January 29, 2013. Presented by:

ora
Download Presentation

Presented by:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Planning Process9th grade Regional Planning Course from the Delaware Recommended Curriculum for Social StudiesJanuary 29, 2013 Presented by: Nicole Minni, GISPUniversity of Delaware, Sustainable Coastal Communities Initiativeand Bryan Hall, AICPSussex County Circuit Rider Planner, Office of State Planning Coordination, OMB

  2. Regional Growth Planning : Levels

  3. Regional Approach : The Master Plan Master Plans are proactive and address issues that transcend the local level growth and development transportation property rights affordable housing air and water quality agricultural district planning Master Plans cross jurisdictions at a sub-regional level

  4. Regional Approach: Public Involvement Stakeholders* Assessment Public Deliberation/Feedback Attend Growth Scenarios Visualization Workshop (s) Identify Community Values Perform land use exercise Deliberate Benefits, Costs, Consequences of Growth Scenarios Select Preferred Scenario Provide Feedback to Jurisdictions • Determine a Regional Study Area Boundary • Review Existing Land Use • Compare Existing Land Use to Jurisdictions’ Comprehensive Plan • DevelopAlternate Growth Scenarios and Compare • Present Scenarios to Public • Make Modifications if Necessary * State Agencies, Local Officials, Business & Civic Leaders, Developers, NGO’s, Citizens

  5. Regional Approach : Master Plan Implementation • State Agency PLUS* Action • OSPC Facilitation • DNREC Infrastructure • DelDOT – TAZ Model • Other: AG, DoE, etc. • Technology transfer to State and local agencies • Master Plan to Comp Plan • Preferred scenario overlay: spatial join to parcel layer for action: TDR and rezoning • Local Councils • Review/Revise/Adopt Scenario 3D example from Placeways, LLC website * Preliminary Land Use Service, Office of State Planning Coordination (OSPC)

  6. Public Engagement Tools for Growth Planning

  7. The Square Mile Source for images: Board Game Geek website chttp://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/2334/square-mile

  8. A Conversation on Values Simply, it is these values which: • Define Community • Build relationships • Resolve conflicts • Promote growth and development • Enhance civic pride • Just to name a few!

  9. A Conversation on Values For Group Exercise One we have three questions: • What makes the Community Special? • What are we as a Community at risk of losing? • What might you change within the Community?

  10. Purpose and Goals Purpose • To have a Conversation on our community’s future. Goals • To capture your thoughts, ideas and concerns so they may be incorporated into a Master Plan, • Provide predictability to all communities whether it is the development and business community or your community, • Build consensus, • Provide shovel ready opportunities to promote economic development, etc.

  11. A Conversation on Values Well, what did you say?

  12. Wordle: Community Values Identification

  13. The UD-SCC Community Land Use Model What is it? It is simply a tool for public involvement in land use decisions 

  14. UD-SCC Land Use Model for Master Planning • Visualization tool used for public involvement in land use decisions • “Paints” a picture of the community’svalues and interests • Land use capacity model representing; • community character • a set of land use designations that do not represent zoning, political boundaries, or ownership • form-based transect approach • Build-out and demographic impacts analysis with 3D geospatial visualization

  15. UD-SCC Model Land Use Transects Source: SmartCode Version 9.2 – The Town Paper Publisher Sources: UD-SCC Community Land Use Model 2003 by DuanyPlater-Zyberk & Company

  16. Source: UD-SCC Land Use Model; Adopted from the Center for Applied Transect Studies

  17. Density Parameters & Assumptions

  18. Community Viz ® “Paints” Base (Existing) Land Use; Validate Build-Out Demographics State land cover / Structures / Building Footprints / 2009 Aerials / Census 2010 / Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ’s)

  19. UD-SCC Model Variables & Assumptions • Density • Nonresidential Square Footage • Mixed Use Percentage • Build Efficiency Percentage • Constraints • “Out-of-Play” from Strategies for State Policies and Spending • Excellent recharge areas • Wetlands / Buffers along streams • Sending and receiving Transfer of Development Rights • Other unbuildable areas

  20. Stakeholder Visioning – Your Turn!

  21. Table Time

  22. Land Use Model Assumptions • Focus: • Residential Dwelling Units • Nonresidential square footage and Employees • Impacts: • Population Demographics • Commercial Employee Statistics • Water and Wastewater Usage • Vehicle Trips per Day • Land Use Constraint: • “Out-of-Play” GIS layer from Strategies for State Policies and Spending (2009) database • Examples: rights of way, agricultural easements, and publically-owned lands, water… 21

  23. Land Use Designations for the Model(per 100 acre tile) • Rural Areas • T100A-Rural (1 DU/100A; e.g. Ag District areas; Preserves ) • T20A-Rural (1 DU/20A; Rural areas, AG, Recreation) • T5A-Rural (1 DU/5A; Rural areas, AG, Recreation & Camping) • T1-Rural Village (1DU/A; Sussex rural villages ) T100A-Rural 22

  24. Land Use Designations for Model(per 100 acre tile) • Urban Areas • T2-SubUrban (2DU/A; All Residential; e.g. Cluster subdivisions) • T4-SubUrban (4DU/A; All Residential; e.g. higher density beach communities) • T4-Mixed SubUrban (4DU/A; Mixed Use; e.g. Developing Areas and ESDA) • T6-Urban Mixed (6DU/A; e.g. Town Centers ) • T8-Town Center (8DU/A; e.g. Municipalities) 4 units per acre 23

  25. Land Use Designations for Model(per 100 acre tile) • Nonresidential Areas • TM-Business(Highway Commercial Zoning) • T30K-Employment Center (Planned Industrial Zoning) • T200K – Retail (Large regional shopping centers) Employment Center 24

  26. Values Transfer to Land Use: the Charrette

  27. Values Transfer to Land Use: the weTable • A Tool for UD-SCC Community Land Use Planning • A Tool for Participatory GIS – Texas Coastal Watershed Program

  28. Visualizing Community Density in 3D

  29. Benefits of the UD-SCC Model • Stakeholder interests visualized and analyzed • Public Engagement deliberates and makes land use choices • Community Character & Values  identified and represented • “On-the-fly” impact analysis identifies consequences • “What-if” process provides implementation options • Iterative tradeoff & visualization process leads to consensus • Scalable Model at State, Local, and Regional Planning

  30. Bridgeville-Greenwood Master Plan & ImplementationMeeting the Chesapeake Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP)

  31. Chesapeake Watershed Implementation Plan

  32. Existing Land Use and Comprehensive Plan

  33. Comparing the Numbers

  34. Master Plan Scenario Implemented

  35. UD-SCC Growth Planning Community Interactive Website www.capehenlopenregionalplan.org/

  36. Special Thank you • Bryan Hall, AICP – Sussex County Circuit Rider Planner, Office of State Planning Coordination, OMB • Carol Bason– Sustainable Coastal Communities Initiative, University of Delaware • Ed Lewandowski – Coastal Community Development Specialist, MASSustainable Coastal Communities Initiative, University of Delaware • Texas Sea Grant at Texas A&M University

More Related