1 / 18

University of California Comprehensive Review 201

University of California Comprehensive Review 201. Today’s Presenters. Elizabeth Tisdale, Counselor, Undergraduate Admissions, UC Riverside Gary A. Clark, Jr., Director, Undergraduate Admissions, UC Los Angeles Michael McCawley, Director, Undergraduate Admissions, UC Santa Cruz.

ordell
Download Presentation

University of California Comprehensive Review 201

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. University of California Comprehensive Review 201

  2. Today’s Presenters • Elizabeth Tisdale, Counselor, Undergraduate Admissions, UC Riverside • Gary A. Clark, Jr., Director, Undergraduate Admissions, UC Los Angeles • Michael McCawley, Director, Undergraduate Admissions, UC Santa Cruz

  3. Comprehensive Review 102 • Minimum qualifications for a freshman • UC Riverside overview • UC Los Angeles overview • UC Santa Cruz overview • A case study – one of over 100,000+ that applied for admission

  4. Freshman Minimum Qualifications 1 Complete a minimum of 15 college-preparatory courses (“a-g” courses), with at least 11 finished prior to senior year. 2 Earn the required grade point average (GPA) in “a-g” courses 3.0 California resident 3.4 Non-residents GPA calculated from 10th & 11th grade course work weighted by a maximum of 8 semesters UC-approved honors grade points Meet the examination requirement by taking the ACT with Writing or the SAT Reasoning Test by December of your senior year. 3 9% x 9% UC systemwide guarantee for CA resident applicants

  5. The Required “a-g” Course Pattern UC looks for academically strong students who enrich the student experience and succeed academically to a timely graduation.

  6. Comprehensive Review Grade-Point Average Test Scores Courses Completed/Planned Honors Courses Eligibility in the Local Context (ELC) Quality of Senior-Year Program of Study Academic Opportunities in California High Schools Performance in Academic Subject Areas Achievements in Special Projects Improvement in Academic Performance Special Talents, Achievements, and Awards Participation in Educational Preparation Programs Academic Accomplishment Within Life Experiences Geographic Location 14 UC Faculty-Approved Criteria

  7. Implementing Campus Selection Each campus has a faculty committee that has plenary authority over undergraduate admissions / selection. • Determine the model of Comprehensive Review that fits the campus – all campuses use comprehensive review. • Campuses determine which of the 14 criteria they will use, and what weight each criterion will be given.

  8. UC Riverside Application Review Process

  9. Application Review Process • Fixed weighted system • Academic Index Score (AIS) • Score developed by Faculty • Selectivity varies by major • Comprehensive Review Criteria • GPA • Test Scores • AP/IB • Socio Economic Factors • Personal Statement • Provides context and additional information not found on application • Supplemental Review Process

  10. Moving Towards Holistic Review • Admit rate is nearing 50% • Holistic review process is in its early stages • Selection criteria will be reviewed by faculty • Projected to move to Holistic Review in 2016 • Pilot program will be launched in 2015

  11. The Holistic Review

  12. The Holistic Review Process • UCLA uses the holistic evaluation process to identify the best candidates for admission to The College of Letters and Sciences. The professional schools use the holistic score in conjunction with departmental reviews when making their decisions. • All our readers participate in an extensive training and certification process throughout the months of November and December prior to beginning their review of real cases. • Each application is read twice by two independent readers. The reviews are blind and neither reader knows the score of the other. If the scores of the two readers differ significantly, the application will be read a third time by a senior reader. We refer to this as a “disparate” review (we have a disparate rate under 4%). • Quality control checks include by-school reviews, high/low checks, and special populations including foster youth, twins and veterans.

  13. Holistic Review Criteria • Academic Criteria: • Grades (unweighted and weighted GPA), ELC status • College preparatory courses (strength of curriculum, rigor, senior year course load) • Test Scores (SAT or ACT plus writing, AP, IBHL) • Other evidence of intellectual achievement (extraordinary, sustained achievement in any field or intellectual endeavor) • Achievement in academic preparation/enrichment programs • Personal qualities of the applicant: • Leadership ability, character, motivation, tenacity, initiative, demonstrated concern for others and the community • Non-academic achievements: • Accomplishments in the performing arts or athletics, employment, leadership in school or community organizations or activities, community service • Likely contributions to the intellectual and cultural vitality of the campus • Diversity of personal background and experience

  14. What is our form of Comprehensive Review? • Our method is called Holistic Review • We use all 14 faculty-approved criteria • Fully trained Admissions Readers conduct our Holistic Review

  15. WHAT WE REVIEW • Entire application read, including personal statements and additional comments • We review for “context” – student in comparison to their peers • School characteristics

  16. HOW WE ASSESS/SCORE • Read a minimum of two times • No fixed weights/points • Single score for each applicant • Recognizes academic achievements, leadership, talents, projects, and personal circumstances

  17. A Case Study What our three campuses would say about this applicant

  18. Questions? Thank you for attending - can we answer any questions? www.universityofcalifornia.edu

More Related