1 / 26

PBA: A Statistics-Based Method to Allocate Academic Library Materials Budgets

PBA: A Statistics-Based Method to Allocate Academic Library Materials Budgets. Wanda V. Dole Washburn University LISU August 2002. Outline. Allocation systems and formulae Percentage Based Allocation (PBA) PBA at Stony Brook, 1993-1998 PBA at Washburn, 2002 Conclusions.

oriel
Download Presentation

PBA: A Statistics-Based Method to Allocate Academic Library Materials Budgets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PBA: A Statistics-Based Method to Allocate Academic Library Materials Budgets Wanda V. Dole Washburn University LISU August 2002

  2. Outline • Allocation systems and formulae • Percentage Based Allocation (PBA) • PBA at Stony Brook, 1993-1998 • PBA at Washburn, 2002 • Conclusions

  3. Allocation Systems & Formulae • Vast literature • Three basic methods • Allocation formulae • Historical method • PBA

  4. Literature of Allocation: Review • German & Schmidt (2001) • Rein (1993) • Budd (1991) • Packer (1988) • Werking (1988) • Sellen (1987) • Sanders (1983) • Yunker and Covey (1980) • Schad (1979)

  5. Literature of Allocation Formulae • More theory than practice • Allocation Formulae • NOT scientific formulae (Shirk, 1984) • Often akin to Rube Goldberg contraptions: “fascinating to watch, but overly elaborate means to ends.” (Lowry, 1992)

  6. Allocation Formulae • Decline in use • 73.3% of colleges in 1940’s (Muller, 1941) • 67.5% of SE academic libraries (Greaves, 1974) • 41% of academic libraries in 1989 (Budd and Adams, 1989) • 40% in 1995 (Tuten & Jones, 1995)

  7. PBA • Proposed by Genaway (1986) • Based on assumption that “any method used to allocate university-wide resources will ultimately be reflected at one point – the budget line given to each college or department”

  8. Based on Instructional & Departmental (I&DR) Budget • Departmental I&DR/Total University I&DR = PBA • PBA x Library Materials Budget = Allocation per Department

  9. PBA • Literature contains no mention of implementation • Young (1992) rejects it as a proposed, but not reported at implemented, “formula” • Rein (1993) cites it as example of “allocation without formula”; calls it “seductive.” Reports it is “untested”.

  10. PBA at Two University Libraries Large academic research (Stony Brook) Small comprehensive university (Washburn)

  11. SUNY Stony Brook • Carnegie Research I • 20,855 students; 1849 faculty • Melville Library + 6 branches • 2 million vols. • 6117 print serials • 1960s & 1970s: rapid growth, generous funding • 1980s & 1990s: reduced funding, slow growth

  12. Stony Brook Identifies Need for Rational Allocation System • Strategic Planning, 1991-92 • ARL/OMS Collection Analysis Project • Develop rational allocation system • CAP ,1992-93, identifies • Problems in allocation system • Objectives • Method for solution

  13. CAP Allocations Task Force • Described how allocation decisions are made • Identified influences on allocation decisions and conflicts that will arise from changes • Analyzed strengths and weaknesses of current practices • Examined serials to monographs ratio

  14. Findings: Problems in the Allocation System • Did not reflect priorities of the University • Could not adapt to fluctuations in funding • Was not based on objective criteria

  15. Task Force Recommendations • Find an allocation SYSTEM that solves the problems • Recommended system: PBA • Implement the system

  16. Recommendation: Adapt PBA to the University • Review University budget and calculate percentage received by each unit • Apply these percentages to acquisitions budget • Make location adjustments

  17. PBA at Stony Brook • Institutional data • Historical acquisitions data: serials & monograph expenditures by fund code • University’s Operating Budget (annual publication): Instructional & Department Research (I &D R) • Calculations • I & DR percentages are calculated (=PBA) • PBA percentages applied to budget • Last year’s expenditures percentages

  18. PBA at Stony Brook • Modifications • Acquisitions budget: • 10-15% set aside for access • 5% set aside for contingencies • Arbitrary PBA established for library depts. • PBA cannot vary from from previous year’s expenditure by more than 10%

  19. PBA at Washburn • Carnegie Master’s University I • 6200 students; 250 faculty • Mabee Library + one branch (CRC) • 345,000 vols. • 385 print serials

  20. PBA at Washburn • Strategic Planning, 2000-02 • ARL/OMS Collection Analysis Project • Develop rational allocation system • CAP ,2001-02, identifies • Problems in allocation system • Objectives • Method for solution

  21. CAP Allocations Task Force • Described how allocation decisions are made • Identified influences on allocation decisions and conflicts that will arise from changes • Analyzed strengths and weaknesses of current practices • Examined serials & monographs

  22. Washburn: Problems in the Allocation System • Complex and old (1980) formula for monographic allocations • No system or formula used for serials allocations • No system for e-resources • No system for ILL/DD

  23. PBA at Washburn • Institutional data • Historical acquisitions data: serials & monograph expenditures by fund code • University’s Operating Budget (annual publication): Instructional & Department Research (I &D R) • Calculations • I&DR percentages calculated (=PBA) • PBA percentages x materials budget • Comparison with previous year’s actual expenditures

  24. Washburn: PBA Results • Unexpected discrepancies between University I&DR % and University “Priorities” • Discrepancies do not follow a pattern • Discrepancies • Specific to Washburn? • Related to size and mission of institution?

  25. Conclusions • PBA at Stony Brook: partial success • Allocations closer to campus priorities • PBA at Washburn: uncertain • Allocations NOT closer to priorities

  26. Conclusions • PBA works at one research library • PBA appears not to work at one master’s I university • Results may be • Specific to these two libraries • Related to size and mission of the library • Needs more research: replication of PBA at other libraries

More Related