1 / 25

SVMI Leading the Way for CCSS

SVMI Leading the Way for CCSS. September 7 th , 2011 Hayward School District. Assessment for Learning. In the Era of the Common Core Standards. David Foster Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative www.svmimac.org. 45* States, DC, and US Virgin Islands Islands.

orien
Download Presentation

SVMI Leading the Way for CCSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SVMILeading the Way for CCSS September 7th, 2011 Hayward School District

  2. Assessment for Learning In the Era of the Common Core Standards David Foster Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative www.svmimac.org

  3. 45* States, DC, and US Virgin Islands Islands *Washington and Idaho have adopted the CCSS conditionally/provisionally ** Minnesota has adopted the CCSS in ELA only

  4. Race to the Top Assessment Program In September 2010, the U.S. Department of Education awarded $350 million of Race to the Top Funds as grants to the two consortia: • Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) • Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Task: To design and develop common K-12 Mathematics and English language assessment systems aligned to common, college-and career-readiness standards.

  5. SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium • Alabama • *California • *Connecticut • *Idaho • *Kansas • *Maine • *Missouri • *Nevada • North Carolina • Ohio • *Oregon • South Carolina • *Utah • *Washington • *Wisconsin • Wyoming • Colorado • Delaware • *Hawaii • Iowa • Kentucky • *Michigan • *Montana • *New Hampshire • North Dakota • Pennsylvania • South Dakota • *Vermont • *West Virginia * Governing States

  6. Caveats • These assessment consortia are state-led initiatives with many players -Many decisions have not been made yet -Some decisions are in flux • The federal role is to provide support to the states for the development of innovative assessments • There will be new assessments in 2014-15 -How innovative will the new assessments be?

  7. Intention of SBAC Design To strategically “balance” summative, interim, and formative assessment through an integrated system of standards, curriculum, assessment, instruction, and teacher development, while providing accurate year-to year indicators of students’ progress toward college and career readiness. Center for K-12 Assessment and Performance Management at ETS

  8. Current vs. CCSS Current STAR Assessments Proposed CCSS Assessments Grades 3-8 and 11, Grades 9 and 10 available for states that choose to use them Delivered via computer (Paper and pencil option available for 3 years) and are computer adaptive Taken during the final 12 weeks of school Performance tasks and comprehensive end-of -year computer adaptive assessment which will some selected response items Accountability system has not been established yet • Grades 2-11, writing at 4th and 7th • Only paper & pencil option • Taken around 85% of the instructional days • Only multiple choice • Part of the state and federal accountability system

  9. Proposed Elements to the Common Assessment • Online testing • College and career-readiness assessment aimed at 11th grade • Rapid reporting system to inform instruction • Teachers involved in developing and scoring tests • Item types • Short constructed response • Extended constructed response • Technology enhanced • Performance tasks • Selected response

  10. Proposed Assessment System Components • Summative assessment (computer adaptive) -supports accountability and measures growth • Interim assessment (computer adaptive) -Optional comprehensive and content cluster assessment -Learning progressions -Available for administration throughout the year • Formative process and tools -Optional resources for improving instructional learning -Assessment literacy

  11. The System(Possible Scenario)

  12. Proposed Timeline • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 Development of formative tools, processes, and practices underway; Specifications for summative and interim assessments developed Summative and interim item development completed ; Interim item pool become available for use Field testing of items for adaptive summative assessment completed Preliminary achievement standards proposed and other policy definitions adopted Operational summative assessment administered; Final achievement standards verified and adopted Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS

  13. Types of Tasks in Mathematics Novice – short items focused on skills and routinesApprentice – medium performance tasks with scaffoldingExpert – long tasks with high cognitive load and/or complexity.

  14. SBAC’s Specifications for Math • Written by Hugh Burkhardt and Alan Shoenfeld as commissioned by Linda Darling Hammond for SBAC. • 60% of the SBAC will be assessed using performance assessment and scored using an analytic point scoring rubric (fashion after MARS rubrics) • 40% will be machined scored.

  15. Exemplars in Appendix

  16. Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative53 Members School Districts and Charter School Networks Antioch Unified Aspire Charter Schools Atlanta PS Bayshore Belmont Berryessa Bolinas - Lagunitas Brisbane Cambrian Cristo Rey School Network Cupertino Discovery Charter School East Side UHSD Emery Franklin - McKinley Hamilton County, Tn Hayward Jefferson Las Lomitas Los Altos Los Gatos Menlo Park Moreland Pittsburgh USD Portola Valley Ravenswood Salinas City Schools San Carlos San Carlos Charter School San Francisco USD (Mission Dist) San Ramon Valley Santa Clara Santa Cruz City Saratoga Scotts Valley SCCOE County Court Schools SMCOE County Court Schools South Cook Service District South San Francisco Walnut Creek Morgan Hill Charter School Mountain Mt Pleasant National Council of La Raza New York City Oakland Military Institute Oakland Unified Pacifica Pajaro Valley Palo Alto Supporting Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Since 1996

  17. September 27 or 29 • October 18 or 20 • November 15 or 17 • December 6 or 8 • January 24 or 26 Locations: Tilden Center, Oakland (Tuesdays), Moreland DO (Tuesday), Nesbit School Thursday, Pajaro Valley DO (Thursday)

  18. Principal As Instructional Leader • Patrick Callahan – Assistant Director of the California Math Project • TBA Dates: • Wednesday November 30 • Thursday February 2

  19. General MAC Meetings • MAC Final Report and Tools for Teachers (October 5th at Santa Clara DRC) • Distribute MAC 2012 Tests and Test Guidelines (February 8 at Santa Clara DRC) • MAC 2012 Preliminary Results, ISR (May 16 at Fremont DO)

  20. Other SVMI Events • Lesson Study Project • Math Network Meetings • MAC Assessments – First Grade • CCSS Transition Units • Shell Centre Formative Assessment Lessons • Number Talk Resources • Problems of the Month

  21. CCSS aligned Unit Outline

  22. Welcome to the Inside Mathematics Website Welcome to Inside Mathematics, a professional resource for educators passionate about improving students' mathematics learning and performance. This site features classroom examples of innovative teaching methods and insights into student learning, tools for mathematics instruction that teachers can use immediately, and video tours of the ideas and materials on the site. Several allied initiatives dedicated to improving math teaching have contributed to this resource. http://www.insidemathematics.org

  23. Field Testing of MAC Tasks Field Test in the Next Grade Level • 4th Grade (Entire Test) • 5th Grade (Entire Test) • 6th Grade (Entire Test) • 7th Grade (one task) • 8th Grade (two tasks) • Course 1 (one task)

More Related