1 / 18

Depletable, Non-recyclable Energy Resources

Depletable, Non-recyclable Energy Resources. Oil, gas, coal & uranium. Energy: one of the critical resources Also from food, meat, plants that depend on energy from sun Raw material from earth’s crust  finished product - with energy When price peaks – find substitute

orinda
Download Presentation

Depletable, Non-recyclable Energy Resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Depletable, Non-recyclable Energy Resources Oil, gas, coal & uranium

  2. Energy: one of the critical resources • Also from food, meat, plants that depend on energy from sun • Raw material from earth’s crust  finished product - with energy • When price peaks – find substitute • Hubbert’s peak: bell shaped? • No idea when oil gets over - think of substitute • Will transition to substitutes be smooth? • Is market mechanism allocating resources efficiently?

  3. Natural Gas • 1974-75 severe shortage - people ready to pay more but no supply • In efficient allocation this magnitude of shortage is should not happen. Why? • Source of the problem: govt. control • ⇧ in automobiles - ⇧ demand for gasoline - while exploring for crude oil - also large quantity of natural gas was found – replaced manufactured gas & coal - pipe lines laid - after II WW important source of energy - US:– Natural Gas Act 1938

  4. Regulated price – Effect of regulation – no conservation - consumption increased drastically • From supply side – production until its profitable – When MC is higher than the price – no production although there was demand - ∴ distorted allocation: • Time of transition was much earlier under price control - we will not use all gas at the price consumers are willing to pay – transition to substitute before technologies are developed to use it • Transition is abrupt as price rises – jump to new price - technology – burden on consumers

  5. Price controls are not permanent – can change with politics – • Ceiling lifted  price rise - if producers are expecting larger rise - stop production and wait for higher prices - consumers have severe problems • Price controls on n-gas created turmoil as it took away economy’s ability to respond to changing situation – regular incidents of control will  collapse of economy - not due to pure market behaviour • Why such behaviour of govt.? • Rent-seeking behaviour

  6. When govt. attempts to ↓ security rent through price controls → over allocation to current generation & under-allocation to future generations ∴ they are worse off – transfer from future to current generation • Price controls are politically attractive as current consumers mean current votes - but also inefficient as losses to future population & producers > than gain to current population • In the LR price-controls harm consumers than helping them as controls distort allocation towards present • President Bush: p-decontrol (1989) in stages – by 1993 no p-control - demand is increasing & production has not kept pace - price ⇧ - imports ⇧

  7. LNG is attractive from air-quality point of view - storage & transport has potential hazards - burns hotter & spreads more rapidly than oil or gasoline – cannot be put off – can injure the people & damage the property up to a distance from the fire itself • Although safety records have been good, potential for terrorism has raised security concerns – facilities: tempting target for terrorists – high security risks especially at coastal areas – (Mumbai has n-gas pipe lines now and had even in the past) to construct new LNG terminals aroused local opposition – political considerations are affecting & will affect the importing nations and supplying economies.

  8. Oil: the cartel problem • Seller power over resources - due to lack of effective competition leads to inefficient allocation • Oil: produced mainly by OPEC countries – monopoly: more scarcity rent than in comp. - force higher price by slower production - monopolistic transition to a substitute later than in competitive transition - ∴ less net present value to the society from these resources • Cartelisation effective - Is its profitability unique to oil? Will oil cartels lead a new wave for natural resource cartelisation?

  9. Must isolate the factors that that make cartelisation possible. Many, but 4 stand out: • Price elasticity of demand for OPEC oil in SR & LR – depends on opportunities for conservation & availability of substitutes • Y-elasticity of demand for oil – Y    DD • Supply responsiveness of oil producers who are not OPEC members – want to max their profits • Compatibility of interests amongst OPEC member countries – members may have a strong incentive to cheat – steal the market

  10. Transition Fuels • Some day will happen • India – Reva (10 years ago), solar cooker.. • Future: transition to renewable source of energy - what happens in intermediate period? • Some believe that no transition fuel required -transition rapid - no transition fuel required • Most believe that transition fuel will play important role • Transition fuel for future: coal & uranium • Their environment impact is different.

  11. Coal: main drawback – air pollution – sulphur dioxide emissions – culprit in acid rain problem – major source of particulate emissions & carbon dioxide – coal users fail to consider env costs • Uranium: used in nuclear electrical generation stations – safety limitation – concerns are for nuclear accidents & storage of radioactive waste • Will market make right decisions? - taking into account current decision making environment: ‘No’ • Many issues involved

  12. Electricity by nuclear reactors requires radioactive elements - if elements escape into atmosphere & come in contact with humans - birth defects, cancer, deaths…. • Nuclear accidents – Chernobyl - Hiroshima, Nagasaki – not accidents - very harmful effects • Losers can/must be compensated by gainers • N-power is efficient - gain to gainers > loss to losers • Japan, France: using n-power – Sweden: closed • Disposable sites: nobody wants – ↓ in land value

  13. Those consume will be taxed to pay compensation to pay those who stay near disposal sites - if people accept - nuclear power is viable option - costs of disposal borne by consumers - e. g. Naurita, Colorado • If taxes get too high to obtain disposal sites, n-power may become non-competitive. Then it is not an efficient source • Are future generations adequately represented in this transaction? - quick answer ‘no’, although it is not right – ↓ in value of land reflecting risk – if land not cheap will not stay there – accept risk in return for cheaper land values

  14. Electricity • Transition fuels – environmental problems • Alternate fuels & solar energy: play increasing role – penetrate market slowly as get more familiar & accessible • How is these transitions are managed by electrical utilities sector? • High prices of oil & n-gas + ↑ cost of generating stations ↓ electrical demand • More conservation is needed – differ capacity expansion • Pricing system of electricity is ill-designed to lead to conservation – MC is > rate - investing in conservation is saving less if the rate is low • Wind or solar? – solar water heating

  15. Energy demand is spread over the year • Should be able to satisfy peak period DD & in other periods underutilised • Peak periods – special costs on utilities: • peaking units: higher MC – fired in peak period • need for capacity expansion: base-load plants need expansion due to p-period demand - slowing growth in this DD can delay the need for new & more efficient generating plants can be made • Peak-load pricing – economic load management technique – charge full MC • Costs don’t include all costs of env damage ∴ low priced  highly polluting - TFCs

  16. In LR use of renewable energy sources • More pollution if poor countries were using fossil fuel - • Can we manage transition effectively? • Renewable energy in different forms: • Hydropower • Biomass • Energy: Solar, wind, geothermal, wave • How much & which - depends on their relative cost & consumer acceptance • Hydrogen – can ↓ rising water dangers

  17. Summary • Relationshipbetween govt & market is not always harmonious & efficient • Price controls  no conservation – discourage exploration & supply – to cause biases in substitution & penalize future consumers – create potential for abrupt, discontinuous transition to renewable resources • Not too much regulation • But govt’s role important

More Related