1 / 9

IFTA / IRP Combined Review Update by Debora K. Meise

IFTA / IRP Combined Review Update by Debora K. Meise 6 th Annual Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar. Committee Members. Gerald Jackson (WY), Chair Beth Hartley (NE) Jay Starling (AL) Renee Kyser (AL) __________________________ Joelle Ward (IRP, Inc.) Ken Carey (IRP, Inc.)

oriole
Download Presentation

IFTA / IRP Combined Review Update by Debora K. Meise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IFTA / IRP Combined Review Update by Debora K. Meise 6th Annual Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar

  2. Committee Members Gerald Jackson (WY), Chair Beth Hartley (NE) Jay Starling (AL) Renee Kyser (AL) __________________________ Joelle Ward (IRP, Inc.) Ken Carey (IRP, Inc.) Art Farley (IRP Peer Review Committee) ___________________________ Richard Beckner (IFTA, Inc.)

  3. Organization Representatives IFTA Rena Hussey (VA) Kirk Davenport (TX) Scott Greenawalt (OK) IRP John Willey (NE)

  4. Jurisdiction Survey Results 57 Jurisdictions Responded to the Survey

  5. Test Jurisdictions • Minnesota Review was held on July 12-14, 2006. • Wyoming Review was held on May 16-18, 2007

  6. Survey says……. Advantages reported by MN and WY • Staff time efficiency, combined review was 3 day on site time commitment • Minimal additional prep time for combined, prep time less than separate reviews • Stress, over in 3 days rather than two separate occasions! • Reviewed same audit files • Combined pre and post review conferences

  7. Team Survey Results/Comments • Overall positive experience • IFTA and IRP administrative reviews remain separate. • Audit review more efficient with the changes made to the worksheets following the Minnesota review. • It was recommended that the team do review cross training on the IFTA and IRP Administrative side while in Oregon

  8. Future Issues for Memberships… 4 Year Review Cycle v. 5 Year Review Cycle Regional Reviews v. Implementation Year Review Rotation Combined Review v. Separate Reviews at the same time

  9. Next steps… Oregon Review has been scheduled for September 18-20, 2007 Oregon is the last approved combined review jurisdiction. All findings and recommendations will be made to both the IFTA, Inc. and IRP, Inc. boards for their January 2008 meetings.

More Related