1 / 6

Shabbir Syed Abdula ,∗ , Luai A. Ahmedb , Rachapalle Reddi Sudhirc ,

Comparison of documentation time between an electronic and a paper-based record system by optometrists at an eye hospital in south India: A time–motion study. Shabbir Syed Abdula ,∗ , Luai A. Ahmedb , Rachapalle Reddi Sudhirc ,

orli
Download Presentation

Shabbir Syed Abdula ,∗ , Luai A. Ahmedb , Rachapalle Reddi Sudhirc ,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of documentation time between an electronic and a paper-based record system by optometrists at an eye hospital in south India: A time–motion study Shabbir Syed Abdula,∗, Luai A. Ahmedb, RachapalleReddiSudhirc, Jeremiah Scholl d, Yu-Chuan Li a,e, Der-Ming Lioua

  2. Background • 印度的失明人口全球最多。在全國逾10億人當中，失明人多達1,500萬，還有5,200萬人視力受損。這些病人中，32萬人未滿16歲，佔全球失明兒童人口五分之一。如果有足夠醫療設備和專業人員，當中一半兒童是可以痊癒的。

  3. Method • The time spent was documented for a total of 200 records (100 EMR and 100 paper records). • The independent-samples t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare the means of the consultation time and calculated documentation time spent between the electronic and paper records.

  4. Conclusion • The results of the study showed no significant difference in the time spent between paper and electronic records. • The mean consultation time spent with electronic records was only 1.52 min longer(0.39 min shorter) than with paper records. • The calculated documentation time spend with electronic records was only 0.92 min longer than with paper records. Neither of these differences was statistically significant.

More Related