130 likes | 197 Views
Reviewing data management, time & effort tracking, monitoring priority areas, and IEP implementation in the ESD 113 region. Includes suggestions for correcting inconsistencies, monitoring LRE, transitioning between programs, and improving secondary transition assessments. The document outlines areas for improvement and strategies to address challenges in special education programs.
E N D
WISM Program Review in ESD 113 RegionOctober 2012 Where are the challenges?
I Data Management – 7/10 • Question C – LRE Reporting • Correct inconsistencies between LRE Calculator, minutes per week on IEPs, bell schedules • Correct LRE codes • Study historical identification patterns that reveal identification above 12.7%
II B Time & Effort Tracking 6/10 • Submit T & E reports for particular staff members • Confirm corrected coding and reporting • Review staffing charged to special education
IV A Monitoring Priority Areas – Child Find, 4/10 • Expand Child Find notice to include Birth-21 • If using WSSDA document, customize it to the district
IV B Monitoring Priority Areas – LRE, 8/10 • Include explanation of extent educated with nondisabled • Review resources on LRE and strategies for increasing access to the general curriculum • Review LRE strategies for preschool
IV D Monitoring Priority Areas – Transition from Part C to B, 5/10 • Develop and implement proportional cost allocation model for preschool • Ensure timely completion of transition from C to B • Clarify roles and responsibilities
IV E Monitoring Priority Areas – Secondary Transition, 6/10 • Complete age-appropriate transition assessments • Make post-secondary goals measurable in education, training and employment • Make sure post-secondary goals are to be completed after secondary • Include course of study • Include notification of transfer of rights at 18 • Invite student to the meeting, keep documentation • Invite agency providing services to the meeting
IV F, G Monitoring Priority Areas – Disproportionality 5/10 • Review resources related to culturally responsive referral procedures
V IEP (A) Implementation – Sufficient Evaluations, 10/10 • Include sufficient evidence to establish or reconfirm disability • Include adverse impact of the disability • Demonstrate need for specially designed instruction • Refer to Evaluation Review Form
V IEP (A) Implementation – Consistency between Evaluation, IEP, Services • Ensure students are receiving services in all areas identified
V IEP (B) Procedural – Measurable Annual Goals, Present Levels Academic and Functional Performance, 9/10 • Include sufficient evidence of performance level for each area of service • Include current data • Include appropriate goals • problems with “study skills”, homework • Write measurable goals • Include quantifiable baseline and target • Writing, behavior, social skills areas of problems • Include explanations of appropriate state assessment, accommodations, appropriate grade level for state assessment
V IEP (B) C Procedural – Frequency, Location, Duration of Services 6/10 • Include all areas of service, delete areas that are eliminated • Be sure there is consistency between student schedule and areas, amount of service • If ESY is TBD, complete it • Include details of ESY service • Be specific about location/context of service • “General/special ed classroom” not OK
Implications for Other 33 Districts • Use this information in internal control activities • Establish a schedule to check IEPs and give feedback to teachers • Use this information and information from IEP checks for targeted professional development for teachers and ESAs