1 / 29

Surgical Site Infection Surveillance – Advancing the Prevention Agenda

Surgical Site Infection Surveillance – Advancing the Prevention Agenda. Professor Judith Tanner Chair of Clinical Nursing Research De Montfort University. Hosted by Vanessa Whatley vanessa@webbertraining.com. www.webbertraining.com. February 7, 2012. Session plan.

ormand
Download Presentation

Surgical Site Infection Surveillance – Advancing the Prevention Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surgical Site Infection Surveillance – Advancing the Prevention Agenda Professor Judith Tanner Chair of Clinical Nursing Research De Montfort University Hosted by Vanessa Whatley vanessa@webbertraining.com www.webbertraining.com February 7, 2012

  2. Session plan • The importance of rigorous surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance • Limitations of current SSI surveillance • An ideal SSI surveillance programme • Benefits arising from rigorous SSI surveillance

  3. Why do we need rigorous surveillance ? • Identify scale of the problem - underestimate SSI rate - not important - no funding for interventions - underestimate cost of SSIs • Benchmarking not valid

  4. CommonestHCAIs • Gastrointestinal 22% • Respiratory 20% • Urinary Tract 19.7% • Surgical site 13.8% • Skin and soft tissue 10.5% • Primary blood 6.8% • Other 3% Third prevalence survey of HCAIs in Acute Hospitals 2006

  5. Why do we need rigorous surveillance ? • Identify scale of the problem - underestimate SSI rate - not important - no funding for interventions - underestimate cost of SSIs • Benchmarking not valid

  6. Limitations of current system ? .

  7. “The Department’s approach to mandatory national surveillance means there is still no grip on surgical site infections.” “Progress is being hit by a lack of decent data.” House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, November 2009

  8. Limitations of current system

  9. Limitations of current system • In-patients, re-admissions, post discharge • Various methods used • 3 month duration • Voluntary versus mandatory

  10. Limitations of current system • In-patients, re-admissions, post discharge • Various methods used • 3 month duration • Voluntary versus mandatory

  11. Limitations of current system • In-patients, re-admissions, post discharge • Various methods used • 3 month duration • Voluntary versus mandatory

  12. Limitations of current system

  13. Limitations of current system • In-patients, re-admissions, post discharge • Various methods used • 3 month duration • Voluntary versus mandatory

  14. The ideal SSI surveillance programme

  15. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  16. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  17. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  18. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  19. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  20. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  21. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  22. The ideal SSI surveillance programme • Full 30 day follow up – in patient, readmission, post discharge • Same method • Duration ? • Mandatory ? • Level I and Level II data • The deep / superficial debate • Compliance data • Feedback

  23. The benefits of rigorous surveillance • Rapid surveillance feedback • Improve practice • Trusts prepared to share data • ‘Real’ SSI rates • Benchmarking, commissioning, patient choice • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce SSIs (including multicentre studies)

  24. The benefits of rigorous surveillance • Rapid surveillance feedback • Improve practice • Trusts prepared to share data • ‘Real’ SSI rates • Benchmarking, commissioning, patient choice • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce SSIs (including multicentre studies)

  25. The benefits of rigorous surveillance • Rapid surveillance feedback • Improve practice • Trusts prepared to share data • ‘Real’ SSI rates • Benchmarking, commissioning, patient choice • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce SSIs (including multicentre studies)

  26. The benefits of rigorous surveillance • Rapid surveillance feedback • Improve practice • Trusts prepared to share data • ‘Real’ SSI rates • Benchmarking, commissioning, patient choice • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce SSIs (including multicentre studies)

  27. The benefits of rigorous surveillance • Rapid surveillance feedback • Improve practice • Trusts prepared to share data • ‘Real’ SSI rates • Benchmarking, commissioning, patient choice • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce SSIs (including multicentre studies)

  28. The benefits of rigorous surveillance • Rapid surveillance feedback • Improve practice • Trusts prepared to share data • ‘Real’ SSI rates • Benchmarking, commissioning, patient choice • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce SSIs (including multicentre studies)

  29. 8 February (FREE … WHO Teleclass)Behavioural Change in Infection Prevention and Control Speaker: Prof. Andreas Voss, Nimjen University, Netherlands 15 February (South Pacific Teleclass)Outbreak of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases – Communicating the Science and Closing the Gaps Speaker: Dr. Nikki Turner, University of Auckland, New Zealand 23 February The Biofilm Hypothesis of Chronic Infection Speaker: Dr. Phillip Stewart, Center for Biofilm Engineering, University of Montana 1 March Developing a Sustainable and Effective Approach to Hygiene and Infection Prevention in Home and Everyday Settings

More Related