100 likes | 200 Views
Teacher Education Advancement Network TEAN. Sponsored by the Higher Education Subject Centre for Education ESCalate at St Mary’s University College, Belfast April 5 th 2011. AIMS OF THE WORKSHOPS ▪ To identify major issues in ITE ▪ To present informed input on these
E N D
Teacher Education Advancement Network TEAN Sponsored by the Higher Education Subject Centre for Education ESCalate at St Mary’s University College, Belfast April 5th 2011
AIMS OF THE WORKSHOPS ▪ To identify major issues in ITE ▪ To present informed input on these ▪ To engage with ITE colleagues in Higher Education and other interested parties • ▪ To encourage debate on the issue(s) and identify both challenges and opportunities • ▪ To share ways forward on the issue
RESPONDING TO CHANGE: Integration and Collaboration • Nasc - connections
THEMES ▪ Practical connections in Teacher Education at St Mary’s as one case ▪ What are the characteristics of effective connections (integration and collaboration)? ▪ What does the profile of connections (otherwise referred to as Integration and Collaboration) tell us about ITE and Teacher Education in general? • ▪ What about the ‘Big Issue’ – The Review of Teacher Education? • Established: March 2003 at Limavady • Completed: ?
WHY CONNECTIONS? To enhance the quality of provision for Initial Teacher Education
OBSERVATIONS ON THE CONNECTIONS • Scale of connectivity • Local to international • Characteristics of effective connections • Clarity of purpose • Effective decision making and resource allocation • High levels of communication • Trust and Respect • WIN – WIN situation • Responsive • Developmental
THE NATURE OF COLLABORATIVE TEACHER EDUCATION inc ITE ▪ Person-centred ▪ Ambitious ▪ Dynamic • ▪ Specialist ▪ Costs • ▪ Relevant ▪ Commitment
BUT … WHAT ABOUT THE BIG ISSUE? The Review of Teacher Education (in an era of high public investment) • Teacher Competence Framework (GTCNI, 2006) • Managing connections (on a scale of 1-10) • Clarity of Purpose? • Effective decision making and resource allocation? • High levels of communications? • Trust and Respect for teacher educators?
THE OUTCOME OF THE REVIEW AFTER 8 YEARS? - A policy vacuum -Left behind -Newly qualified teachers have no connection to Higher Education -Frustration -Loss of ambition and momentum -Self preservation • What should be done? - Dig deeper - Start again (in an era of disinvestment)