1 / 24

IEEE 802.20 Technology Selection Process

IEEE 802.20 Technology Selection Process. Presentation of Contribution C802.20-04-72 Dan Gal Berlin, September 14, 2004. Introduction. This is the presentation version of contribution C802.20-04-xx, a proposal for IEEE 802.20 technology selection process (TSP)

oscar-walsh
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.20 Technology Selection Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.20Technology Selection Process Presentation of Contribution C802.20-04-72 Dan Gal Berlin, September 14, 2004

  2. Introduction • This is the presentation version of contribution C802.20-04-xx, a proposal for IEEE 802.20 technology selection process (TSP) • Purpose: Start a working group discussion and trigger follow-up contributions for an agreed-upon technology selection procedure • Goal: Adopt a TSP in the November 2004 plenary meeting. IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  3. Outline • This TSP proposal includes: • Suggested processground rules • Selection process stages • Form templates • A list of open issues that require additional contributions and working group resolutions. IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  4. TSP Elements • Define Technology Proposal submission rules • Define a scoring system • Define selection rules • Identify decision criteria issues that require working group resolution IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  5. Section 1 - Introduction • This proposal is not a complete procedure • It is recommended that an agreed upon TSP be adopted before the call for 802.20 proposals IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  6. Section 2.1 – Document Precedence • In case of a conflict with the rules, the applicable IEEE SA rules, as well as the 802.20 rules, shall have higher precedence [than the TSP] IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  7. Section 2.3.1 – Proposal Submission Rules • Technology proposals shall include five parts: • Part I: Technical Specifications Summary (section 2.3.2). • Part II: Technology Description (section 2.3.3). • Part III: PHY/MAC specifications (section 2.3.4). • Part IV: Evaluation Criteria simulations results (section 2.3.5). • Part V: Compliance statement (section 2.3.6). IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  8. Section 2.3.1 – Proposal Submission Rules • Proposals need not be fully compliant with the 802.20 SRD in order to be considered for the technology selection process • Proposals shall comply with the IEEE 802 SA patent policies IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  9. Section 2.3.2 – Tech Proposal Part ITechnical Specifications Summary • Use SRD as a reference, specify values and indicate ranking IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  10. Section 2.3.3 – Tech Proposal Part IITechnology Description • Detailed technical description of the technology • Use engineering white paper style • Show how the proposal meets or exceeds the SRD requirements IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  11. Section 2.3.4 – Tech Proposal Part IIIPHY, MAC Specifications • Style and level of detail -- similar to IEEE 802 standards IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  12. Section 2.3.5 – Tech Proposal Part IVPerformance Evaluation Results • Evaluation Criteria test results • Use a uniform tech report template (TBD) IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  13. Section 2.3.6 – Tech Proposal Part VSRD Compliance Statement • A fully compliant proposal has no entries in the “P” column IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  14. Section 2.3.7 – Tech ProposalsSubmission • Comply with the call for proposalsrequirements • Post on the 802.20 website, at least 30 calendar days before a working group interim or plenary meeting. IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  15. Section 2.3.7 – Tech ProposalsPresentation • Presentation material shall be fully consistent with the text of the formal proposal. • In case of inconsistencies, the formal proposal shall prevail and a corrected presentation shall be submitted ASAP • Presentations shall be treated like WG contribution and shall be allowed adequate time slots on the meeting agenda • Generate meeting minutes of all presentations and associated Q&A IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  16. Section 2.3.8 – Tech ProposalsAmendment & Consolidation • Amended proposals shall not include significant changes (that affect performance) • Submit and post amended proposals at least 14 days prior to the next WG session • Consolidated proposals shall be considered new proposal IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  17. Section 2.3.9 – Tech ProposalsScoring System (slide 1) • The scoring system shall consist of a list of the most essential (quantitative and qualitative) performance attributes required of a winning proposal • A weighted average scoring system shall be • Collect individual member scores and calculate the group average scores (tables 3 and 4) IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  18. Section 2.3.9 – Tech ProposalsScoring System (slide 2) IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  19. Section 2.3.9 – Tech ProposalsScoring System (slide 3) IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  20. Section 2.3.9 – Tech ProposalsScoring System (slide 4) • Issues the WG needs to resolve: • Establish the most essential requirements – try to keep the list short (< 20 items) • Assign averaging weights IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  21. Section 2.3.9 – Tech ProposalsScoring System (slide 5) • The scoring process shall be conducted in a plenary session • Final scores shall be posted on the WG website prior to the next step – the voting rounds IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  22. Section 2.3.10 – Tech ProposalsSelection Rounds • The selection of the winning proposal shall assure that the most meritorious proposal is chosen. • The scoring process shall be conducted in a plenary session • Elimination rounds; followed by selection among the two finalists • Voting of the winning proposal must be consistent with the scoring results, evaluation results and compliance tables. IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  23. Section 2.4 – Tech ProposalsSelection Stages Phase 1: • Stage 1: Proposal submissions. • Stage 2: Working-group Presentations • Stage 3: Review proposal compliance tables and evaluation results • Stage 4: Poll and document the member-scores • Stage 5: Proposal elimination (round 1) – select the top-two proposals • Stage 6: If proposal consolidation is requested, skip to “Phase 2” below, otherwise, move to round 2 and select the winning proposal. • Stage 7: Finalize the technology selection process. Phase 2: (optional, follow from stage 6 of “Phase 1” above) • Stage 1: Consolidated proposals submission • Stage 2: Working-group Presentations • Stage 3: Review proposal compliance tables and evaluation results • Stage 4: Poll and document new member-scores • Stage 5: Present the proposal-scores and vote the top-two proposals. • Stage 6: Select the winning-proposal. • Stage 7: Finalize the technology selection process. At any TSP stage, the working group may decide (by simple majority) to abort it and cycle back to the previous stage. IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

  24. Summary • This TSP proposal is designed to assure a balanced and fair selection process • Additional work is needed to bring this proposal to an agreed upon, complete TSP state (see TBD indications and the five annexes of contribution C802.20-04-72) IEEE 802.20 Contribution C802.20-04-72

More Related