230 likes | 369 Views
Citation Analysis of Theses/Dissertations. A basic analysis of sources, dates, authors for a Marine Biological Laboratory SAIL meeting - Wilmington, N.C. - May 14, 2009 Kathleen Heil, UMCES, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD . Introduction: .
E N D
Citation Analysis of Theses/Dissertations A basic analysis of sources, dates, authors for a Marine Biological Laboratory SAIL meeting - Wilmington, N.C. - May 14, 2009 Kathleen Heil, UMCES, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD
Introduction: In these tough financial times when science is becoming more interdisciplinary and subfields are expanding as are number of titles in the sciences I wanted a way to evaluate material usage. Since most of our journals are now accessible on-line I had lost my major source of input on usage, which was re-shelving and observation.
Citation analysis has merits and limitations, but has many applications beyond collection development. • Although I haven’t gotten further than the collection development access at this point. • My future goal is to show institutional relatedness. (How broad or limited are our institutional connections)
Background: • CBL has always had very strong ties to the University of Maryland • 1925 Founded under Dr. Truitt from Univ. of Md. • 1930’s Start of summer programs • 1941 Sponsored by the Md. Conservation Dept andbecame the chief component of the State Dept. of Research and Education • 1961 Md. Legislature created the Natural Resources Institute as part of the University of Maryland • Summer Classes began as Credit courses toward degrees • 1973 Became partof a new Campus of the University of Maryland System - TheCenter for Environmental & Estuarine Studies (UMCEES) • 1997 Became UMCES (University of MarylandCenter for Environmental Science.
Background/History (continued) • 1976 Graduate students formally began work during the school year as part of their graduate school experience • The first degrees were issued in : • 1976 MS under the Dept of Botany University of Maryland College Park • 1981 PhD Under the Dept of Microbiology University of Maryland College Park
Objective: • Compare and contrast literature citations from MS & PhD theses/dissertations • Identify citation patterns • Formats of materials used • Most frequently cited material • Differences between subject areas
Methodology: • Use DRUM, the University of Maryland Dspace Open Access archive to pull UMCES-CBL theses/dissertations from the last 5 years. • http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum • Copy and paste references into Word and then move them into Excel. • Put each thesis/dissertation into a new tab • Sort data into uniform format: author, year, title, source.
Find usage by year • Sort by year • Graph • Hope to get to soon - • Use find replace function to switch years to age
Identify Materials Cited A / V Audio tape / Video B Monograph C Conference Paper D/TH Dissertation / Thesis Go Government document/web site Gr Grey Literature J Journal M Magazine N Newspaper P Personal Communication S Software T Technical report W Web site/ web page
Journal usage trends: Title dispersion Proportion of journals cited Most cited Journals
Most Heavily Cited Journals • I reviewed a merged listing of publications • After doing sort on material type • There were 40 journal titles that had over 10 citations • Range from 10 to 119 • The highest used title was Environmental Science and technology
References: • Ashman, Allen B. “An examination of the research objectives of recent citation analysis studies” Collection Management 34 : 112-128, 2009. • Bakkalbasi, Nisa, Kathleen Bauer, Janis Glover and Lei Wang “Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science” eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006080 • Burrell, Quentin L. “Are “Sleeping Beauties” to be expected? (Short communication) Scientometrics v. 65 (3): 381-389, 2005. • Cordes, Ruth, “Is grey literature ever used? Using citation analysis to measure the impact of GESAMP, an international marine scientific advisory body” Can. J. Infor & Lib. Sci v.28 (1): 49-69, 2004 • Cox, Janice E. “Citation analysis of graduate dental theses references: implications for collection development”. Collection management 33 (3): 219-234, 2008. • Kuruppu, Pali U. & Debra C. Moore “Information use by PhD students I agriculture and biology: a dissertation citation analysis” Portal: Libraries and the academy v. 8 (4): 2008, pp. 387-405. • Moed, Henk F. “new developments in citation analysis and research evaluation” Information Services & Use (2006) 135-137 • Ortega, Linda “Age of reference in chemistry articles: Science & Technology Libraries, 28 (3):209-46, 2008. • Radicchi, Filippo, Santo Fortunate & Claudio Castellano “Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objetive measure of scientific impact” PNAS Nov. 11, 2008. Vol. 105 (45) 17268-17278. • Ralston, Rick, Carole Gall, Frances A. Brahmi “Do local citation patterns support use of the impact factor for collection development” J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 96 (4): Oct. 2008 pp. 374-378. • Su, Yu-Min, Shu-Ching Yang, Ping-Yu Hsu, Wen-Lung Shiau “Extending co-citation analysis to discover authors with multiple expertise” Expert Systems with Applications 36: 4287-4295, 2009 • Tunon, Johanna, Bruce Brydges. “Expanded assessment study examining the citation patterns from traditional and nontraditional institutions and their effect upon the quality of doctoral dissertation reference lists. • Vallmitjana, Nuria and L.G. Sabate. “Citation analysis of PhD Dissertation references as a tool for collection management in an academic chemistry library. College & Research libraries v. 69 (1) : 72-81, Jan 2008.