E N D
1. Community Broadband Networks Why Local Governments Matter
W2I Digital Cities Convention
Washington, D.C.
December 11, 2007
Kenneth S. Fellman
Kissinger & Fellman, P.C.
2. www.kandf.com Why Local Governments Matter Sorry State of Broadband in the US
Many communities dont have it
Where we do have it.
Its slow
Its expensive
Its not very competitive
3. www.kandf.com Barriers to Entry Industry: We dont like them
(Some) States: We dont like them
Unless..
..theyre imposed on those pesky local governments!
4. www.kandf.com Whats the Policy Goal Here, Anyway?! Federal, State and Local Governments should work together (what a concept!)
With the telecom industry
With the business community
With the educational community
With the health care community
With non-profits and other public groups
5. www.kandf.com Regionalism and Wireless Networks an example
6. www.kandf.com Colorado Wireless Communities What is it? Regional Wireless Broadband Community Initiative
600K+ Population
240,000 HHs
137 Square miles of coverage area Arvada
Boulder
Broomfield
Golden
Lakewood
Louisville
Northglenn
Superior
Thornton
Wheat Ridge
7. www.kandf.com Colorado Wireless Communities What is it? History, Process, Structure
Began as informal exploration
Summer 2006 5 cities completed community Feasibility studies
Fall 2006 Other communities joined, all signed a Memorandum of Understanding
Developed RFP released in Jan. 2007
IGA signed creating formal, intergovernmental agency
8. www.kandf.com Why Cities are Exploring Broadband Networks Recognition of the connection between broadband infrastructure and community well-being
Economic Development
Small, medium-sized businesses
Mobile workers
Efficient and Effective Government
Field workers, public safety, remote data, phone/radio service
Social Issues: Digital Inclusion
Changing lifestyle and work style expectations
9. www.kandf.com Why Cities are Exploring Broadband Networks Cities have ownership and/or access to vertical assets
Some have fiber availability to offer
Attraction of increased competition, more consumer choices, and changing use patterns
10. www.kandf.com Benefits of a Regional Approach (City Perspective) Critical mass for best proposals from best providers (600,000 pop., 137 sq. miles)
Improves business case
Increases likelihood for long-term relationship
Increases likelihood for financially strong and stable provider
Strengthens overall position of communities and users of network
Developing trend around the Country (Long Island, Silicon Valley, others)
11. www.kandf.com Benefits of a Regional Approach (Provider Perspective) One clear, consistent process for entering a regional market
Single Right-of-way permitting process for all ten jurisdictions
Facilitation of access to light poles
Facilitation of access to identified City assets
Potential for expansion of the CWC
Creates structure and framework moving forward
12. www.kandf.com Timing is Everything Market adjustment just about at time of RFP responses
Impacted number and type of responses
Still found private sector partner with unique elements in business plan
Status: contract negotiations underway
13. www.kandf.com Bottom Line Local Governments are part of the market
Local Governments are advocates for the best interests of their citizens
Local Governments should be seen as partners in broadband deployment efforts
We are more effective when we work together
14. www.kandf.com Thank You!
For more information:
Ken Fellman
3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, Suite 900
Denver, Colorado 80209
303-320-6100
kfellman@kandf.com