60 likes | 184 Views
the independent office of evaluation’s work programme for 2014. 20 September 2013. Key evaluation activities in 2014. ARRI: 12 th edition A consolidated picture of results and impact achievement of IFAD operations
E N D
the independent office of evaluation’s work programme for 2014 20 September 2013
Key evaluation activities in 2014 • ARRI: 12th edition • A consolidated picture of results and impact achievement of IFAD operations • Summary of cross-cutting issues and learning insights and recommendations on the basis of evaluations • 2nd edition of the IFAD Evaluation Manual
Key evaluation activities in 2014 (cont.) • CLEs: Assess the results of IFAD-wide corporate policies, strategies, business processes and organizational aspects • Revised IFAD Policy on Grant Financing (Jan 2013 - Jun 2014) • IFAD’s engagement in fragile states (Jan 2014 – Jun 2015) • CPEs: Include assessment of project portfolio, non-lending activities and COSOP performance, provide inputs into new COSOPs • Ongoing CPEs – national roundtable workshops in 2014: Bolivia, China, Senegal, Zambia • New CPEs: Bangladesh, Sierra Leone, Tanzania
Key evaluation activities in 2014 (cont.) • Project evaluations: • PCRVs: Based on desk review, 100% coverage – around 30 PCRVs in 2014 • PPAs: Include a brief field visit, 25% coverage - around 8 PPAs in 2014 • Impact evaluation: 1 (project to be determined) • Evaluation synthesis: • IFAD’s engagement in middle income countries • Pastoral development
Key evaluation activities in 2014 (cont.) • Other activities: • Evaluation capacity building • IOE Comments on RIDE • IOE Comments on PRISMA • Notes on COSOPs where CPEs are available • 5-6 sessions of the Evaluation Committee and several presentations to the Board • Engagement in IFAD10
Lessons learned • Relevance of evaluations to IFAD corporate and programmatic priorities • Enhanced knowledge sharing, outreach and communication to further strengthen the evaluation learning and feedback loop • The need to gain deeper insights into current operation, assessing their relevance as well as the extent to which past lessons are adequately internalized in new policies, strategies and operations. • The importance for IFAD Management and staff to allocate the necessary time and resources in their work plans for evaluations • Due attention to the approach paper (including methodology, process and timeline) and to the preparation of the self-assessment • Regular interaction between IOE and concerned IFAD staff throughout the evaluation process