310 likes | 516 Views
The Northwest Forest Plan. An Overview. What is the Northwest Forest Plan? What have been the Plan’s major accomplishments to date? What steps are the agencies taking to improve upon the present course of Plan implementation?
E N D
The Northwest Forest Plan An Overview
What is the Northwest Forest Plan? What have been the Plan’s major accomplishments to date? What steps are the agencies taking to improve upon the present course of Plan implementation? What critical issues and challenges are still in need of resolution to more effectively satisfy both the Plan’s conservation and commodity goals?
History Commercial logging in Pacific Northwest begins in late 1800s, increases significantly after WWII Northern Spotted Owl listed as threatened species under ESA in 1990 By 1992, court injunctions had shut down virtually all Federal old-growth timber sales
Adoption of the Strategy • Forest Plan Conference held in Portland in 1993 • Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture directed to jointly develop array of options for managing Federal old-growth forests in Pacific Northwest • In 1994, Northwest Forest Plan adopted • Was first time Federal agencies developed a common management strategy for entire ecological region
Geographic Scope The Northwest Forest Plan area encompasses 24.4 million acres of Federal lands in the western portions of Oregon, Washington, and Northern California
Five Key Principles • Never forget human and economic dimensions of issues • Protect long-term health of forests, wildlife, and waterways • Focus on scientifically sound, ecologically credible, and legally responsible strategies and implementation • Produce a predictable and sustainable level of timber sales and non-timber resources • Ensure that Federal agencies work together
Land Allocations • Previously Reserved Areas >Congressionally Reserved Areas (30%) >Administratively Withdrawn Areas (6%) • NFP Reserve System >Late-Successional Reserves (31%) >Riparian Reserves (11%) • Areas available for programmed timber harvest >Matrix (16%) >Adaptive Management Areas (6%)
Standards &Guidelines • A series of Standards & Guidelines provide various forms of management direction that applies either: >within a particular land allocation >across the entire NFP area • All Standards & Guidelines have underlying objectives that describe their purpose and application – e.g., >Objectives of LSRs include protection and enhancement of late-successional and old-growth forest conditions >Objectives of Matrix include programmed timber harvest
AquaticConservationStrategy • Primary objectives are to restore and maintain watersheds and aquatic functions and systems • Strategy consists of four primary components: >Riparian Reserves >Key Watersheds >Watershed Analysis >Watershed Restoration
Three Kinds of Monitoring Implementation Effectiveness Validation
Adaptive Management: “Learning to manage and managing to learn” • Adjusting management over time to better achieve NFP objectives in light of new information • Integral principle woven into the fabric of the plan that applies throughout NFP area • Adaptive Management Areas: Network of 10 areas specifically designed for testing alternative approaches to more effectively achieve desired ecological, socio-economic, or other objectives
Survey & Manage • Suite of mitigation measures for rare and little-known species within NFP area • Surveys -- Site-specific Pre-Disturbance Surveys -- Strategic Surveys • Management recommendations designed to maintain high-priority species sites
Interagency & Intergovernmental Framework • Regional Interagency Executive Committee (RIEC) and staff office provide forum for representatives of 12 Federal environmental and natural-resource agencies • Advisory committees at both regional and provincial levels provide input from State, County, and Tribal governments, as well as from local stakeholders • Intergovernmental Information Management group coordinate on data standards and information sharing
NFP upheld by courts against nearly 100 legal claims, ending years of court injunctions against all Federal old-growth harvest • Greatly improved interagency coordination and collaboration in management of NW Federal forests • NFP has strong scientific foundation and research agencies continue to provide valuable input in support of implementation
Marked increase in protection of old-growth forests while providing timber outputs at or near projected amounts for first 5 years • Watershed Restoration Activities > Watershed analyses completed on 85% of Federal lands > Over $186 million invested in Watershed Restoration > Net reduction of over 900 miles of roads in Key Watersheds Monitoring results > Implementation Monitoring shows 95+% compliance rate > Northern Spotted Owl monitoring has shown apparent improvement in owl demographic trends
Benefits to Other Initiatives & Resources • FY $ Millions Projects Jobs (FTE) • 31.9 425 245 • 33.5 600 290 • 31.5 500 235 • 30.4 425 245 • 25.9 430 425 • 18.7 375 310 • 2000 17.0 340 280 • Totals $189 3,095 2,030 • Habitat Conservation Plans on non-Federal lands • Salmon habitat restoration • Enhanced source water protection • Related economic initiatives (see table)
Adaptive Managementin Action • Survey & Manage measures recently revised to enhance flexibility and efficiency of implementation • Increased emphasis on thinning dense, young stands in LSRs to enhance and protect late-successional habitat in response to growing body of research • Adaptive Management guidelines under development to provide for more systematic consideration of management adaptations in light of research and other new information
Increased Focus on Local Discretion & Decision-making • Issuing guidance on site-specific modifications consistent with NFP objectives to harness field-unit expertise and improve plan’s effectiveness • Crafting criteria to exempt narrowly framed NFP modifications from regional review where projects have buy-in from province-level groups
Enhanced Collaboration with State, Tribal, and County Governments • Proactive solicitation of non-Federal advice on significant policy-related implementation issues • More effective public communication, information, and outreach tools in use • Coordinating on related non-Federal initiatives to achieve greater integration and efficiencies
Timber Sales • Adoption of NFP resulted in significant reduction in timber harvest from pre-injunction level in 1980s • After NFP adopted, gradual ramp-up of timber sale volume offered to levels near annual projected amount • In recent years, expected sales have fallen well below projected annual amount primarily as a result of: • >Adverse court rulings • >Certain elements of NFP haveaffected timber harvest more than was anticipated
Implementation Processes • In aggregate, requisite implementation processes hamper achievement of full suite of Plan’s principal objectives • NFP pioneered efforts to streamline ESA consultation, but some efficiencies have been undermined by recent court rulings • NFP itself contains variety of analytical and procedural requirements (e.g., Survey & Manage involves difficult and time-consuming procedures)
Implementation Costs • Overall costs of implementing the NFP are high • Certain NFP elements (e.g., Survey & Manage) have proven particularly costly to implement • Reliance on agencies’ multiple funding sources and processes also presents challenges
Coordinated Response to Critical Issues & Concerns • Agencies working to modify ESA salmon consultation process to address adverse court rulings and injunction • RIEC has endorsed in principle a suite of proposed changes to improve the ability of NFP to meet all of its objectives