E N D
1. Managing theACGME Core Competencies
3. The ACGME Outcome Project
4. Underlying Principles
9. CREOGCompetency Task Force
10. CREOGCompetency Task Force
11. Best Guide to Determine Expectations
12. What do the RRCs Want?
13. Model Assessment Summary
14. Model Assessment Summary
15. Global Assessment Ratings
18. Patient Care General
Remember:
We are good educators and have been doing a good job.
We need to develop a “tool box” that is program friendly, resident friendly, and teacher friendly.
We need to help programs know where their starting point is located.
19. Patient Care Competency Residents must be able to provide patient care that is compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health problems and the promotion of health.
20. Patient Care Residents are expected to:
communicate effectively and demonstrate caring and respectful behaviors …
gather essential and accurate information …
make informed decisions about diagnostic and therapeutic interventions…
develop and carry out patient management plans
counsel and educate patients and their families
use information technology in patient care and patient education
perform competently all medical and invasive procedures considered essential for the area of practice
provide health care services aimed at preventing health problems or maintaining health
work with health care professionals, including those from other disciplines, to provide patient-focused care
21. Tracking Scope of Clinical /Educational Experience
General:
“Global Assessment” Tools (Overall summaries)
Semi-annual Summaries
Annual Assessment
Exit Interviews
Specific:
Focused Assessment
On-site Evaluations
Rotation Evaluations
Semi-annual Summaries
Annual Assessment
Exit Interviews
23. How do we teach surgical skills? Imagery
Observation
video
assisting in the operating room
Mental Practice
Anatomy review
Pelvic models, dog labs
Student dependent !!!!
24. How do we teach surgical skills? Systematic Review of Performance
Teacher dependent!!!!!
25. Systematic Review of Performance FEEDBACK, FEEDBACK, FEEDBACK
In the OR
Real time
Constructive
Competency based evaluation
26. Technical Skills AssessmentCompetency Based Evaluation Feasibility
Reliability
Validity
Predictive of future performance
Content domain
Concurrent
Construct
Face – resembles real life
27. Teaching and Testing Technical SkillsReznick RK, AJS 1993;165:358
28. Teaching Surgical SkillsOSATS (objective structured assessment of technical skills) Reznick RK – Univ. of Toronto
1993- present
Validated global and procedure specific tools
Used models with reliable results
Exported evaluation to other programs with reliable success
Transferred evaluation system to o.r. and found positive correlation between time and quality of surgery between resident levels
29. Teaching Surgical SkillsOSATS Barbara Goff – University of WA
2000 - present
Validated global and procedure specific tools
Used models with reliable results
Instructors can evaluate their own residents reliably
Exported evaluation to other programs with reliable success
31. Making your own competency evaluation tools Decide on skill/procedure
Surgery, Amniocentisis, Biophysical profile
Look at textbooks, operative reports
Department/Expert Consensus
Use animal models, dry lab, or actual procedures for evaluation
Evaluate validity and reliability
32. Medical Knowledge Residents must demonstrate knowledge about established and evolving biomedical, clinical, and cognate (e.g. epidemiological and social-behavioral) sciences and the application of this knowledge to patient care. Residents are expected to:
demonstrate an investigatory and analytic thinking approach to clinical situations
know and apply the basic and clinically supportive sciences which are appropriate to their discipline
33. What we already do well CITROG Examination
Annual assessment
Large number of items (315)
Broad base of information tested
High reliability (r=0.91)
34. What we can (easily) do better Chart Stimulated Recall Examination
Format familiar from ABOG oral exam
Based on examinee’s case list
PGY4’s currently collecting information
Breadth of knowledge ensured using list of Core Knowledge Areas
Use Focused Resident Competency Assessment Form
35. Global Ratings New form
Combines both ordinal categories & free form comments
Good data supporting reliability of global rating forms for evaluating Medical Knowledge
36. More Challenging Assessments Oral examinations
Format familiar from standardized oral exam portion of ABOG exam
Hypothetical patient case scenario presented
Time intensive
Development
Training to ensure inter-rater reliability
Administration
Useful for familiarizing residents with ABOG exam format
Based on CREOG learning objectives or list of Core Knowledge Areas
37. Other Assessment Tools OSCE
Time intensive
Costly
360o Evaluation
Validity of assessment
Peers
Subordinates
Other members of the health care team
38. Good News! We are already assessing Medical Knowledge well
39. ACGME Competency Defined
40. Current Assessment Methods
41. ACGME/RRC Think Tank
42. Focused Assessment of Communication Skills
44. C-FAC Implementation
45. Patient and/or Professional Associate Assessment
47. ACGME Definition Residents must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities, adherence to ethical principles and sensitivity to a diverse patient population. They are expected to:
Demonstrate respect, compassion, and integrity: a responsiveness to the needs of patients and society that supercedes self interest: accountability to patients, society and the profession: and a commitment to excellence and ongoing professional development.
Demonstrate a commitment to ethical principles pertaining to provision or withholding of clinical care, confidentiality of patient information, informed consent and business practices
Demonstrate sensitivity and responsiveness to patient’s culture, age gender and disabilities.
48. Defining Professionalism Perhaps the biggest challenge to meeting this competency
Developing a definition or “Code of Conduct”
Defining behaviors that match
Resources- ACGME, ABIM, CREOG, ACOG
49. Match Behavior to Definition Respect
Treats others with respect does not demean, insult or make others feel inferior
Uses respectful language when discussing patients
Excellence
Conscientious effort to exceed ordinary expectations, commitment to life long learning
50. Education *Role-modeling
*Environment
Discussion of Expectations
Critical incident
* Case discussion
Didactics
Readings
Role play
51. Evaluation 360 degree evaluation
Separate from summative evaluation
remove halo effect
Discussion of professionalism at formal teaching committee meetings
more likely to elucidate professionalism issues
Critical incident form/process
52. 360 degree evaluation Evaluate from many different perspectives more effective and instructive
Peers
Students
Patients
Nursing/allied health personnel
Self
Attending
54. Initiating Program Define professionalism/Code of Conduct for your residency
Define desired behaviors
Develop evaluation form-360ş
Assess environment
Faculty development
Component of intern orientation
Develop curricula
Repeating theme in didactic sessions
55. Culture CREOG objectives
significance of conception, birth, marriage, death
provide competent care for diverse cultural background
Allied health, nursing excellent curricular resources
Education: Reading, didactics, portfolio, sessions with interpreters and patients
Evaluation- 360ş, simulated patients , case discussion
56. Ethics History of education in this area
Curricular guidelines in CREOG and ACOG-Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Lecture/case studies/component of case presentations
Many sessions necessary to impact care
Evaluation-?360, portfolio, simulated cases
57. Conclusion Exemplary professional behavior is and has been an expectation of all physicians
We have and have had the responsibility to foster, enhance and evaluate these behaviors
Currently it is done informally
We need to formalize and document the process
58. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Practitioners Needs are Changing due to the Information Age
Patients have access to unfiltered medical information
Up-to-date medical knowledge deteriorates over time if left alone
This competency aims to teach skills that residents will need to practice life-long learning
59.
Residents are expected to:
Analyze their own practice
Efficiently locate and evaluate applicable literature
Use information technology to assist in locating information
Apply knowledge of study design and statistical methods to critically appraise literature
Facilitate learning of students and health care staff Clinicians want to provide high quality care
Based on high-quality evidence
Up-to-dateClinicians want to provide high quality care
Based on high-quality evidence
Up-to-date
60. Evaluation Tools
1. Global Assessment Form
2. Resident Portfolio:
Journal Club Evaluation Forms
Resident Research Evaluation Form
Clinical Topic Review Log
M&M
Interesting Clinical Topic
61. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
62. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Journal Club Evaluation Everyone uses some elements of this competency in searching and reading the literature
Making this activity a natural venue for evaluation
63. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
64. Journal Club Evaluation Forms
65. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Journal Club Evaluation Forms The general format for all forms leads the resident through these questions:
Are the results of the study valid?
What are the results?
Are the results likely to apply to my patient or practice?
67. Journal Club Evaluation Forms
68. Research Evaluation Form
69. Clinical Topic Review Log
70. System-Based Practice Residents must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care and the ability to effectively call on system resources to provide care that is of optimal value. Residents are expected to:
understand how their patient care and other professional practices affect other health care professionals, the health care organization, and the larger society and how these elements of the system affect their own practice
know how types of medical practice and delivery systems differ from one another, including methods of controlling health care costs and allocating resources
practice cost-effective health care and resource allocation that does not compromise quality of care
advocate for quality patient care and assist patients in dealing with system complexities
know how to partner with health care managers and health care providers to assess, coordinate, and improve health care and know how these activities can affect system performance
71.
“Residents live in the fault lines of health care systems and give voice to what life is like there.”
Paul Batalden. MD
72. “The prominence of physicians in highly interdependent medical systems confers tremendous power on them, individually and as a profession. With this power comes an ethical responsibility to be deeply concerned about medical systems.”
Nolan, Annals Intern Medicine, 1998
73. SUGGESTED CURRICULUM CONTENT FOR SBP Quality assurance /Quality improvement
Managed care systems
Analysis of medical error utilizing a systems based approach
Population based medicine
74. RESIDENT SKILLS FOR SBP Effectively access and utilize resources
Understand different types of health care systems and how they interact with physicians, patients, and society
Utilize evidence based, cost effective strategies to optimize care for individual patients and for populations of patients
Utilize a systems oriented approach to identifying and reducing medical error
Function effectively in the health care team
Advocate for patients to optimize outcomes
75. MEASUREABLE OUTCOMES FOR SBP SKILLS Attending global assessment
Interdisciplinary teamwork
Patient satisfaction / Patient advocacy
Discharge plans / discharge summaries
Benchmark of practice, especially preventive measures
Addressing systems failures
76. ATTENDING GLOBAL ASSESSMENT FOR SBP Unsatisfactory:
Unable to access/mobilize outside resources; actively resists efforts to improve systems of care; does not use systematic approaches to reduce error and improve patient care
Superior:
Effectively accesses/utilizes outside resources; effectively uses systematic approaches to reduce errors and improve patient care; enthusiastically assists in developing systems’ improvement
77. INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK 360 Degree Assessments
Professional Associate Surveys
Peer Evaluations
78. PATIENT SATISFACTION / PATIENT ADVOCACY 360 Evaluations
Professional associate survey
Patient survey
Portfolio assessments
Write a letter to an HMO requesting a non-formulary medication for a patient
Draw a flow chart mapping a patient’s outpt visit and identify all systems involved
Perform a cost analysis of a patient’s inpt bill
79. DISCHARGE PLANS/SUMMARIES Record performance review
Screen inpatient charts for completeness of plans (medications prescribed, followup appointments confirmed, home health visits scheduled,etc)
Monitor number of incomplete medical records to reflect responsibility to the system for complete and accurate records
80. BENCHMARKS OF PRACTICE Record performance review
Screen outpatient clinic charts for documentation of preventive care
Mammograms, Pap smears, Immunizations, Colorectal cancer screening, etc.
Profile resident clinic practices for utilization of ancillary services, cost effective use of medications
Review samples of resident outpt billing & coding
81. BENCHMARKS OF PRACTICE Portfolio assessment
Assign resident to identify incidence of a specific health problem in their clinic population, assess cost effectiveness of current screening methods, identify impediments to implementation of screening and suggest ways to improve
82. CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM “FISHBONE” DIAGRAM
83. ADDRESSING SYSTEMS FAILURES
Quality Assessment / Quality Improvement
Analysis and reduction of medical error
84. QUALITY ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENT
Portfolio assessment
Assign resident to identify a systems problem in a patient care setting, analyze the systems involved, develop at least two interventions to improve the problem and develop a plan to assess outcome of intervention
85. QA/QI PROJECT **********************************************************************
86. ANALYSIS AND REDUCTION OF MEDICAL ERROR
Portfolio assessment
Analyze an adverse patient outcome or near miss using a root cause analysis approach
Discussion based performance assessment
Participate in Near Miss Conference discussion
87. EVALUATION OF QA/QI PROJECT
The resident chose a project that could significantly improve patient care / the medical environment.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident identified multiple systems impacting this issue.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident identified a team of people to address the issue.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident worked with the QA team and developed a well constructed plan to implement the necessary changes to achieve the goal.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident identified multiple resources within the healthcare system that would be necessary to achieve the goals of the project.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident identified how the results of the planned changes would be monitored to measure the success of the project.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Overall assessment of project.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
88. ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL ERROR
89. EVALUATION OF ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL ERROR
The resident identified a significant adverse outcome or near miss event for analysis.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident evaluated the event from a systems based approach.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident identified multiple “latent” sources of systems errors that contributed to the adverse event.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The resident identified several possible changes that could be made to prevent a recurrence of this type of adverse event.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Overall assessment of analysis
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9