1 / 21

Evidence-Based Management of Migraine

Evidence-Based Management of Migraine. Robert L. Ringler, Jr., MD FAAFP. Evidence. New info? Maybe not….. What interventions have level A or level B evidence? A = Data supporting this statement derived from level 1 studies -> meet all of the evidence criteria for that study type

Download Presentation

Evidence-Based Management of Migraine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence-Based Management of Migraine Robert L. Ringler, Jr., MD FAAFP

  2. Evidence • New info? Maybe not….. • What interventions have level A or level B evidence? • A = Data supporting this statement derived from level 1 studies -> meet all of the evidence criteria for that study type • B = Data supporting this statement derived from level 2 studies -> meet at least one of the evidence criteria for that study type • ACP PIER (Physician’s Information and Education Resource), DynaMed

  3. Clinical prediction guides Causation Diagnosis Differential diagnosis Prevention or Treatment Prognosis Quality improvement or Continuing education Economics of health care programs or interventions Systematic review articles Study Types

  4. Screening • 3 questions have validity for self-administered screening for migraine in primary care • “Has a headache limited your activities for a day or more in the last three months?” • “Are you nauseated or sick to your stomach when you have a headache?” • “Does light bother you when you have a headache?”

  5. Screening • 3-item subset of disability, nausea & photophobia had: • 81% sensitivity • 75% specificity • 93% positive predictive value • 68% test-retest reliability for migraine based on semi-structured diagnostic interview • (Neurology 2003 Aug 12;61(3):375), commentary in Evidence-Based Medicine 2004 Mar-Apr;9(2):56

  6. Diagnosis • Evaluate symptoms to distinguish migraine from tension-type or other types of headache in patients with normal neurologic exam [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • P ulsatile quality – described as pounding or throbbing • O ne-day duration – episode lasts 4-72h if untreated • U nilateral location • N ausea or vomiting • D isabling intensity – usual daily activities altered during episode • Post-test probability • 4 / 5 criteria – positive likelihood ratio 24 for definite / possible migraine • 3 / 5 criteria – positive likelihood ratio 3.5 for definite / possible migraine • 0-2 criteria has negative likelihood ratio 0.41

  7. Laboratory tests • Recognize that neuroimaging is not usually warranted for migraine patients with a normal neurologic exam [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Apply lower threshold only for patients with atypical headache features or those who don’t meet strict definition of migraine • Meta-analysis of studies of migraine pts with normal neuro exam found a rate of significant intracranial lesions of 0.18%

  8. Hospitalization • Consider hospitalization for pts with intractable migraine and “medication overuse” / “rebound” headache [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Parenteral dihydroergotamine (DHE) • Phenothiazines • Corticosteroids • Parenteral analgesics

  9. Non-Drug Therapy: Diet • Encourage patients to identify and avoid diet-related factors that may contribute to headaches [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Caffeine withdrawal • Nitrates and nitrites in preserved meats • Phenylethylamines in aged cheeses, red wines, beer, champagne, chocolate, & MSG in Asian & other prepared foods • Dairy products • Fatty foods

  10. Non-Drug Therapy: Behavioral • Consider specific behavioral therapies for migraine patients, including relaxation training, biofeedback, or cognitive-behavioral therapy [AB - mix of level 1 (high-quality) and level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Preference for non-drug interventions • Poor tolerance for specific Rx • Medical contraindications for specific Rx • Insufficient or no response to Rx • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or nursing • Hx of long-term, frequent, or excessive use of analgesic or acute Rx that can aggravate HA problems • Significant stress or deficient stress-coping skills

  11. Drug Therapy: Nonspecific • Use nonspecific therapy with acetaminophen or NSAIDs for pts with mild-moderate attacks w/o severe N/V [A - level 1 (high-quality) evidence] • Effective • Less costly • Less likely to cause adverse effects • Naproxen 750mg initially, 500mg 1h later (or 660/440 if you use OTC) • Aspirin 1,000 mg effective for acute migraine [A - level 1 (high-quality) evidence];

  12. Drug Therapy: Specific • Use Rx designed specifically for treating migraines in pts with severe attacks [A - level 1 (high-quality) evidence] • Triptans – use first: more effective and cause less nausea • Your oral triptan of choice • Other delivery systems (sublingual, nasal, SQ) • 3 HA without effect – switch dose or drug • If not effective with first dose, don’t use second • 70% rule • Dihydroergotamine (DHE) • Ergotamine • All contraindicated in pts with CAD • More effective than “stepped care”

  13. Drug Therapy: Nausea • Recognize that many migraine pts require specific Rx for N&V that is associated with their migraine attacks [AB - mix of level 1 (high-quality) and level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Metoclopramide (and some other antiemetics) + NSAIDs effective • IV metoclopramide effective as monotherapy for HA and N/V • Oral or rectal antiemetic with mild nausea – allows use of oral analgesics • Non-oral route for antiemetics and migraine-specific drugs in pts with severe N or V

  14. Drug Therapy: Rescue • Provide a pt-administered rescue Rx and a plan for its use to migraine pts who have attacks that cause disability [AB - mix of level 1 (high-quality) and level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Opiate analgesics • To be used if no relief within 1 hour • Written plan: • Not more than 2 doses per week or more than 50% of attacks

  15. Drug Therapy: Prevention • Consider preventive Rx in pts with frequent disabling HAs or poor relief from appropriately used acute treatments [A - level 1 (high-quality) evidence] • Recurrent HAs that interfere with daily routine • Contraindication to acute (abortive) therapy • Failure or overuse of acute therapy • Adverse effects from acute therapy • A preference for preventive therapy • Uncommon migraine (e.g. basilar migraine or hemiplegic migraine)

  16. Drug Therapy: Prevention • Choose among the following effective classes of agents, listed in order of strength of evidence for efficacy: • Non-ISA β-antagonists • Propranolol (80-320 mg/day) • Timolol (10-60 mg/day) • Anticonvulsants • Valproic acid (250 mg twice daily, maximum 800-1500 mg/day) • Topiramate (100 mg/day) • Antidepressants, calcium antagonists • Amitriptyline (10-150 mg/day) • Verapamil (80-240 mg/day)

  17. Drug Therapy: Prevention • Consider perimenstrual preventive treatment with a triptan for menstrual migraines • Frovatriptan 2.5mg BID starting 2d before onset, continuing for 6d • Valproate is the only antiepileptic drug approved by the FDA for migraine prevention • Topiramate is also used • Try a preventive Rx for at least twomonths before changing the agent • Expected 33-50% reduction in migraine frequency; effectiveness is “bottom up”

  18. Drug Therapy: Prevention • SSRIs appear ineffective for migraine prophylaxis [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Riboflavin has very limited evidence of efficacy [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • Riboflavin 400 mg/day for 3 months may reduce frequency of migraine attacks • Recent evidence indicates ACE inhibitors may also be effective for prophylaxis

  19. Patient Education • Develop a plan for the self-management of acute attacks, including limits on dosing, rescue medication, and a plan for how and when to contact a healthcare provider [A - level 1 (high-quality) evidence] • Identifies all treatment modalities used, including those used for coexisting conditions • Includes a coordinated treatment plan that all parties acknowledge and accept (e.g. patient, primary care physicians, ED, neurologist, psychologist) • Can be effectively communicated to the patient

  20. Follow-up • Consider prospectively monitoring symptoms with a HA diary to estimate effectiveness more objectively if the subjective assessment of initial Rx effectiveness is not clear [B - level 2 (mid-level) evidence] • User-friendly • Measure: attack frequency, severity, duration, disability, type of treatment, treatment response, and adverse effects of Rx • http://www.achenet.org/resources/diary.php

  21. Questions? ringlerl@evms.edu

More Related