1 / 15

Urbana School District #116 AYP Status Report 2009

Summary of AYP data for 2009, highlighting school performance, subgroup achievements, and areas for improvement. Insights on instructional strategies and key success factors. Current status of the district's academic progress and improvement plans.

ottoh
Download Presentation

Urbana School District #116 AYP Status Report 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Urbana School District #116AYP Status Report 2009 Report to the Board of Education October 6, 2009 Donald Owen, Assistant Superintendent

  2. Definitions

  3. Elementary FRL Gaps 2009

  4. Summary of 2009 AYP Data • 3 elementary schools (King, Prairie, and Wiley) and UMS made AYP. • First time since 2006 UMS has made AYP • First time since 2007 that any elementary school has missed AYP • UHS did not make AYP in Reading or Math overall, and did not reach AYP for African American students in Math, and Economically Disadvantaged students in Reading and Math. • Of the36testing hurdles in 2009, USD students passed 33 of them. 91.7%. • The District reached all AYP targets for Math in 2009. African American, Hispanic, and Economically Disadvantaged subgroups did not make AYP in Reading at the district level. • Focusing on a variety of student data to inform instructional and curricular decisions is one key factor to success. • This includes Response to Intervention, Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports, and Professional Learning Community models. • Schools (teachers and students) continue to work harder than ever at meeting state standards in a variety of ways (not just on state tests).

  5. Current Status • ISBE published “Pathways” of State/Federal Improvement Status September, 2009 (included in packet). • UHS is Academic Watch Status Year 3 (Restructuring). • UMS is Academic Watch Status Year 2 (Restructuring Planning) – No Change from 2008. • District is in Academic Early Warning Year 1 (Status has not changed since 2004).

More Related