Tallahassee Childhood Obesity Prevention (COPE) Coalition Logic Model

1. Tallahassee Childhood Obesity Prevention (COPE) Coalition Logic Model • Assumptions • The community will be motivated to become agents of change. • Obesity is a community wide issue. • Community/ • External Agency partnerships will create sustainable environments for healthy children. • There is a genuine partnership among all key stakeholders. • Inputs • COPE Leadership Team ( FAMU, Fla. Family Network, FSU- Center on Better Health and Life for Underserved Populations, & Greater Frenchtown Revitalization Council) • COPE Coalition Administrative staff • Cope Consultants • Florida Blue Foundation • EMBRACE Leadership team • COPE Mighty 22 Mini- Grantees • COPE Youth Health Leadership Work Group • Parents • COPE Research Work Group • COPE Policy Work Group • COPE Youth Leadership Advisory Committee • Outputs/Participation • # of partners identified to represent six “Call to Action” priority areas • Strategy developed to address priority needs/gaps • # of engaged Parents ,Youth, Community Partners • # of programs identified for best practices • # of workshops, trainings, seminars by/for/with youth & families • # Youth Presentations • # of existing polices reviewed for obesity/ chronic disease, youth leadership & engagement, • # of stories from the field • # of publications COORDINATION COLLABORATION SUCCESS FACTORS • Increase in activities contributing to access to healthy foods (e.g., community gardening • Increased access to enhanced physical activity • Increased parent, youth, school & community engagement • Increased organizational practice changes • Increased stories from the field as a awareness, advocacy tool • Increased involvement of coalitions in policy change • Increased policy implementation (e.g., 95210, Health in Every Policy) • Increased programs and policies developed to address needs/gaps • Increase in repository of existing activities to reduce childhood obesity • Increased engagement of youth and families • Increased leadership opportunities for youth voice and participation • Increased changes in existing policies and practices • Increased sustainability of programs and policies to address needs/gaps • Increase in # of community mini-grants aligned with 7 success strategies and COPE C2A items • Increased marketing and advertising practices • Use of new knowledge generated from project • Increased effective communication engaging partners on knowledge, awareness & action • Increased hits on COPE Website • Increased local research forming/framing the work • Increased opportunities for family and youth engagement , education, & empowerment • Increased opportunities & partnerships for community, local, county and /or state policy • Increased sustainable resources • Increased multi-sector policy, environmental and behavior changes • Increased development of coalitions • Functions/Activities • Partnership development and sustainability • Development of Stories from the Field • Policy development and education • Research development and innovation • Data and evaluation • Outputs/Participation • # of partnerships aligned working with 7 success strategies & Call to Action priority areas • # of existing activities to reduce childhood obesity • # of youth community leaders • # of policies developed • # of grantees using best practices models • Development of a best practice model (June 2012)