60 likes | 138 Views
Critical moments. School officials-late reporting Charlie Figueroa-whistleblower Slow start to investigation Sheila Byron Mari Carmen Ferraez. Legalization of Act of Violence. Why did this case go to trial if no disagreement that act was committed?
E N D
Critical moments • School officials-late reporting • Charlie Figueroa-whistleblower • Slow start to investigation • Sheila Byron • Mari Carmen Ferraez
Legalization of Act of Violence • Why did this case go to trial if no disagreement that act was committed? • Consequences of “legalizing” this act is to transform an act of violence into something else • Whether or not act was consensual • Problem of law is how it converts violence into questions of law and due process
INVESTIGATION • Legality of police investigation and arrest • Reliability of victim-could she be believed? • Could she testify? • Would her identity be protected? • Political reality of district attorney • Age of defendants-chris and bryant-family court • Role of press • Charge-aggravated sexual assault, conspiracy to commit sexual assault
PRE-TRIAL • Plea bargain offer • Grand Jury • Rape Shield Law • Tactical decisions • Should Leslie take the stand? • Should defendants take the stand? • What witnesses?
CHARGE • Was force or coercion used against her? • Was she mentally defective and did the defendants know or should they have known?
SENTENCE • Up to 40 years • What kind of jail? • Bail pending appeal