90 likes | 234 Views
Utilizing the ESA for WFD implementation: opportunities and challenges. Eduard Interwies. Background. Environmental policy consulting: Focus on water management (WFD, international), but also marine, agriculture, energy policy Economics: methods/policy support and instruments But also:
E N D
Utilizing the ESA for WFD implementation: opportunities and challenges Eduard Interwies
Background Environmental policy consulting: • Focus on water management (WFD, international), but also marine, agriculture, energy policy • Economics: methods/policy support and instruments But also: • Science-policy interfacing in research projects (e.g. ESAWADI – see working group hydromorphology)
ESA-WFD: opportunities • Support answering open issues from 1st RBMP (Economics? Exemptions?) • Better understanding of ecosystem functions, roles and interactions (land-sea etc.) • Good „linking element“ for policy integration: „bridge“ (nature protection, water management, energy et al.) • Communication: illustrative and understandable (more than WFD!)
ESA-WFD: challenges • Anthropocentric approach: focus on “what nature provides humans“: sufficient for sustainability in the long run? Existence values considered sufficiently? • Ecosystem services: even if activities putting pressure on the ecosystem (e.g. oil extraction, hydropower)? Do not confuse ESA valuation with “recognition of the value to protect ecosystems” in the policy process! But: „nice wrong numbers“ for benefits…
ESA-WFD: challenges • Links between the WFD objectives and ecosystems? Maybe “good status”-WFD but not well-functioning ecosystem & vice-versa? • Scale issues: broad-scale (WFD) assessment of ES difficult-expensive, even not useful? • Measurement: usual issue of „illusion of precision“ when trying to monetize: just the known benefit valuation problems – or beyond?
Way ahead for 2. RBMP & beyond • Scale: ESA supporting: • strategic assessments (at RB scale?) for balancing policies / selecting policy options and • local (group of WBs?)/specific situations in „hot spots“ with societal conflicts / high ecological threats • ESA as focal point in understanding policy links and interactions (e.g. MSFD-WFD) • Good basis for international understanding and coordination: common language (even beyond EU?) • Clear link of ESA to understanding the „well-functioning“ of ES: don´t just hunt for numbers…
Way ahead for 2. RBMP & beyond CENTRAL: communicate! ESA can help discussing effects of measures/their feasibility (“disproportionality”, Art.4)/acceptance with the stakeholders/the public! • Overall: on content, the ESA does not fundamentally bring new „content“ to modern WFD-implementation – but helps focusing on what is important – and provides a good (necessary!) communication and exchange tool! • ESA is not the “egg-laying wool-milk-pig”…
Thank you for listening! Eduard Interwies Kontakt: Interwies@intersus.eu