1 / 32

Can research make you a better teacher?

twitter.com/ ProfCoe. Can research make you a better teacher?. Robert Coe ResearchEd , London, 6 Sept 2014. Before we start …. I’m not saying What has worked will always work All research should be RCTs Teaching is like following a recipe Teachers must become researchers I am saying

Download Presentation

Can research make you a better teacher?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. twitter.com/ProfCoe Can research make you a better teacher? Robert Coe ResearchEd, London, 6 Sept 2014

  2. Before we start … • I’m not saying • What has worked will always work • All research should be RCTs • Teaching is like following a recipe • Teachers must become researchers • I am saying • Good teachers need high-level skills and the practical wisdom to make good decisions • Professional development that promotes research knowledge and mindset may help develop such skills and wisdom • We should evaluate this robustly

  3. I am assuming If you are not trained and accredited in a validated lesson observation protocol • Don’t grade lessons • Be very cautious about giving feedback What you think is ‘good teaching’ may not be

  4. What does ‘better’ look like?

  5. Teacher Professional Standardsshould • Be based on best evidence about pedagogy, teacher effectiveness, learning theory • Reflect diversity of teacher needs/contexts/stages (one size doesn’t fit all) • Include protocols for demonstrating when they are met that are • Clear and operationalisable • Consistent across different raters, schools, etc • Demonstrably predictive of valued pupil outcomes

  6. Evidence-based standards for effective teaching? • Evidence about relationships between teacher skills, knowledge & behaviours and ‘effectiveness’ • Evidence about what can be changed (and how) • Based on ‘best’ theories of • Pupil learning • Pedagogy & teaching effectiveness • Behaviour change (individual, institutional, systemic) • Most important: does focusing on these things lead to improvement?

  7. What kinds of skills, knowledge, behaviours, qualities and competences are required to be an excellent teacher? • Sources of evidence • Evidence and theory from cognitive science about learning: how our brains acquire, make sense of and use information (eg Willingham: Why don’t students like school; Bransford et al., 2000 ) • Evidence from educational effectiveness research about teacher behaviours associated with learning gains (egMuijs et al 2014: State of the art – teacher effectiveness and professional learning ) • Evidence from intervention studies about what can be changed, and its effect on outcomes (eg Sutton Trust-EEF Toolkit)

  8. How might we move forward? • Review the best existing evidence about what excellent teaching looks like • Review existing frameworks / protocols / evaluation instruments for identifying excellent teaching • Develop/collect some self-assessment + feedback + discussion tools to allow teachers to assess and develop their skills/knowledge/practice in a range of dimensions • Evaluate the impact (on a range of valued outcomes) of using them

  9. Dimensions of great teaching • (Pedagogical) content knowledge • Behaviour / control / classroom management • Classroom climate / relationships / expectations • Quality of instruction • Wider professional elements: collegiality, development, relationships • Research knowledge

  10. 1. (Pedagogical) content knowledge

  11. California, 1875 Divide 88 into two such parts that shall be to each other as 2/3 is to 4/5 (from Shulman, 1986) England, 2012 What is 643 divided by 0.1?

  12. 307 - 168 261 How would you respond? A pupil writes Another says, ‘Take 8 away from both’ 307 - 168 299 - 160 How would you respond? (from Ball et al, 2008)

  13. 2. Behaviour / control / classroom management

  14. Pupil survey (from Tripod) • Student behavior in this class is under control. • I hate the way that students behave in this class. • Student behavior in this class makes the teacher angry. • Student behavior in this class is a problem. • My classmates behave the way my teacher wants them to. • Students in this class treat the teacher with respect. • Our class stays busy and doesn't waste time.

  15. Time on task observation tool Next observation 1.2s Jimmy Bone-Idle On task Off task Not clear ‘On task’ = thinking hard about what they are supposed to be learning

  16. Dealing with disruption • the teacher is not using any strategy at all to deal with a classroom disorder problem, • the teacher is using a strategy but the problem is only temporarily solved (the disorder reoccurs), • the teacher is using a strategy that has a long-lasting effect (From Kyriakides et al 2009) Use video excerpts in an online training programme, with a test to identify accredited observers

  17. 3. Classroom climate / relationships / expectations

  18. Test your mindsethttp://mindsetonline.com/testyourmindset/step1.php • You have a certain amount of intelligence, and you can’t really do much to change it. • No matter who you are, you can significantly change your intelligence level. • You can learn new things, but you can’t really change your basic intelligence • You can change even your basic intelligence level considerably

  19. Other aspects of climate • Attributions to effort or ability • Students’ motivational goals (mastery vs performance) • Teacher expectations • Quality of relationships (teacher-students) • Response to failure (grit)

  20. 4. Quality of instruction

  21. The Dynamic Model (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2006) • Orientation • Providing the objectives for which a specific task/lesson/series of lessons take(s) place • Challenging students to identify the reason why an activity is taking place in the lesson. • Structuring • Beginning with overviews and/or review of objectives • Outlining the content to be covered and signalling transitions between lesson parts • Drawing attention to and reviewing main ideas • Questioning • Raising different types of questions (i.e., process and product) at appropriate difficulty level • Giving time for students to respond • Dealing with student responses • Teaching modelling • Encouraging students to use problem-solving strategies presented by the teacher or other classmates • Inviting students to develop strategies • Promoting the idea of modelling

  22. The Dynamic Model (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2006) • Application • Using seatwork or small-group tasks in order to provide needed practice and application opportunities • Using application tasks as starting points for the next step of teaching and learning • The classroom as a learning environment • Establishing on-task behaviour through the interactions they promote (i.e., teacher–student and student–student interactions) • Dealing with classroom disorder and student competition through establishing rules, persuading students to respect them and using the rules • Management of time • Organizing the classroom environment • Maximizing engagement rates • Assessment • Using appropriate techniques to collect data on student knowledge and skills • Analysing data in order to identify student needs and report the results to students and parents. • Teachers evaluating their own practices

  23. Principles of Instruction(Rosenshine, 2010) • Begin a lesson with a short review of previous learning • Present new material in small steps, with student practice after each step • Ask a large number of questions and check the responses of all students • Provide models for problem solving and worked examples • Guide student practice and rehearsal • Check for student understanding • Obtain a high success rate (80%) • Provide scaffolds for difficult tasks • Require and monitor independent practice • Engage students in weekly and monthly review

  24. Measuring quality of instruction • Requires ‘high inference’ judgements • May be no alternative to extensive training (eg CLASS, Danielson FFT) • Worth trying: • Specify skills and context (eg Y9 algebra, questioning to check understanding) • Peer review of video excerpts • Rating using ACJ (Adaptive Comparative Judgement)

  25. 6. Research knowledge

  26. How research might help • Research knowledge • Informs pedagogical practice • Informs decisions about strategy and policies • Informs attempts to implement and embed more effective practices • Research mindset • Robustly evaluates ongoing performance on a range of outcomes • Evaluates the impact of any changes made • Adopts a critical perspective: ‘show me the evidence’

  27. www.educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit Impact vs cost Most promising for raising attainment 8 May be worth it Feedback Meta-cognitive Peer tutoring Early Years Homework (Secondary) 1-1 tuition Effect Size (months gain) Collaborative Behaviour Small gp tuition Phonics Parental involvement Smaller classes ICT Social Summer schools Individualised learning Small effects / high cost After school Teaching assistants Mentoring Homework (Primary) Performance pay Aspirations 0 Setting £0 £1000 Cost per pupil

  28. True or false? • Reducing class size is one of the most effective ways to increase learning [evidence] • Differentiation and ‘personalised learning’ resources maximise learning [evidence] • Praise encourages learners and helps them persist with hard tasks [evidence] • Technology supports learning by engaging and motivating learners [evidence] • The best way to raise attainment is to enhance motivation and interest [evidence]

  29. Key elements of good evaluation EEF DIY Evaluation Guide • Clear, well defined, replicable intervention • Good assessment of appropriate outcomes • Well-matched comparison group What could you evaluate?

  30. Summary

  31. We need a wider understanding of ‘great teaching’ that is based on research evidence • Tools to help evaluate teaching quality could be made widely available • Clarify and make explicit what teachers need to learn • Monitor progress against these learning aims • Focus attention and effort on approaches that are likely to make a difference • We still need to evaluate whether using these tools leads to any improvement • Ultimately, ‘great teaching’ is evidenced by better learning, so high-quality assessment is key

More Related