1 / 12

INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE

Brief to OEMA Spring Directors’ Seminar. INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE. 12 April 2012. 1. Contents. Integrated Risk Management “Silo-ed” Approach & Integrated Approach Homeland Security Enterprise IRM Strategy Comparison: IRM & NPS In Review.

papina
Download Presentation

INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Brief to OEMA Spring Directors’ Seminar INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE 12 April 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012 1

  2. Contents • Integrated Risk Management • “Silo-ed” Approach & Integrated Approach • Homeland Security Enterprise • IRM Strategy • Comparison: IRM & NPS • In Review 12 April 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012 2

  3. Integrating Risk Management into the Homeland Security Enterprise Background • Franklin County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (FCEM&HS) takes a risk-based approach to the Homeland Security Enterprise business model. • Intent is to more effectively engage elected officials and decision makers in EMHS policy making. • Problems to address: • Same response for every hazard but terrorism. • Risks were not incorporated into training, exercise, and funding strategies. • Efforts duplicated due to partners working in silos. 12 April 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012 3

  4. Integrated Risk Management (IRM) • Very complex system; coordinated by FCEM&HS to help ensure decision makers are educated about risks impacting Franklin County and fully integrated into the strategic planning process for managing those risks. • FCEM&HS is building an IRM process to support the Homeland Security Enterprise. • Participation by Decision Makers in the Homeland Security Enterprise (public and private sector CEOs) is key to fully realizing integrated risk management. • This is a cultural and paradigm shift in Homeland Security thinking in Franklin County. 12 April 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012 4

  5. Decision-makers are crucial to Integrated Risk Management • “Planning builds upon existing processes, focusing on the incorporation of risk information to inform decision makers.” Mitigation Framework, 2012 • “The Framework provides individuals; communities; and government, private sector, and nongovernmental organization decision makers with an understanding of the full spectrum of protection mission activities and what they can do to ensure our Nation is optimally protected from man-made and natural disasters.” Protection Framework, 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012

  6. “Silo-ed” Approach • EMA • Non- • Profits • NGOs • Fire • LE • Citizens • Federal • State • Decision • Makers • Private • Sector • CEOs • Health SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012

  7. Integrated Approach • EMA • Emergency • Partners • Fire • LE • Citizens • State and • Federal Partners • Local • Jurisdictions • Federal • State • Health • Decision • Makers • Non- • Profits • Private • Sector • CEOs • NGOs SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012

  8. Homeland Security Enterprise Local Emergency Partners State and Federal Partners Jurisdictional CEO’s FCEM&HS Communication & Coordination Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) is a “whole community” approach. Utilizes partnerships among emergency management, law enforcement, public health, local/state/federal government, private sector, nongovernmental organizations, faith-based & community-based organizations, and the public. Federal guidance focus is on all-hazards preparedness; local HSE partners must share info regardless of threat or hazard, man-made or natural. Foundation of IRM is understanding the Risk  Capabilities  Gaps  Decision-Making process . SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012

  9. Integrated Risk Management Strategy Decision Maker Education and Engagement Risk Risk Capabilities Capabilities Gaps Gaps Planning Training Exercises Funding Priorities Planning Training Exercises Funding Priorities Franklin County Threat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Franklin County Core Capability Assessment Franklin County Gap Analysis Homeland Security Enterprise Decision Maker Review & Updates SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012

  10. Comparison: IRM & National Preparedness System SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012

  11. In Review • We are all part of the Homeland Security Enterprise. • Risks  Capabilities  Gaps  HSE Decision Making = IRM. • Successful implementation of both IRM and NPS in Franklin County rests on participation of Franklin County decision makers. • End-state: an informed body of leaders in Franklin County who understand our risks, capabilities and gaps and use that knowledge as part of the HSE to shape policy and funding. • Franklin County will also produce a Guide that can be disseminated by OEMA and FEMA to help local governments implement Integrated Risk Management at the local level. 12 April 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012 11

  12. QUESTIONS / DISCUSSION Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security 12 April 2012 SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR 2012 12

More Related